Tuesday, July 15, 2014

CreationScience, does this YouTube name seem ironic?


 Debunking TheThinkingAtheist.com on Bible Contradictions ...
www.  youtube.    com   /watch?          v=MX3dNBfsxFM
 By CreationScience ·
5 min ·
Added May 22, 2013
 TheThinkingAtheist.com posted an article on 'Bible contradictions'. I've never seen such a hopeless article. How the website managed to get the About.com ...
.
 Thethinkingatheist - World News









I find it interesting that YouTube member CreationScience views Seth Andrews' article on Bible contradictions to be a "hopeless" article and wonders how the About . com website has given the "Thinking Atheist" website any awards.  There actually are contradictory views in the Bible if you read the text without trying to resort to confirmation bias to support the beliefs that you already hold to, but I'm sure that CreationScience wouldn't care anyways. This person clearly is convinced that their religious views are "right" and nothing can change their mind. Sincerely believing something without any evidence that is testable, conclusive and peer-viewed does not make the claim's that person is making to be "true". If a woman claimed that she is actually Princess Ariel of Atlantica from Disney's 1989 classic animated film " The Little Mermaid", if she sincerely believes this, does that mean that this woman's claims are true without any credible evidence ?






I also doubt that CreationScience considers the fact that there are some Muslims, Jews, Hindus, Buddhists and Scientologists etc., who believe that their religion is the "only true and correct" religion and that views of Christians are wrong and false and that there are doomed to burn in a lake of fire and brimstone for eternity or face eternal annihilation etc., . There are non-Christian religious persons who sincerely believe in the claims that their religion espouses.  If non-Christian religious persons cannot prove that the claims of their religions are "true", than couldn't Christianity be just as wrong as these other religions?  I am quite certain that CreationScience holds to the view that Christianity is the "only true and correct " religion because that is either what that person was raised to believe or it is what they chose to believe. I  am also quite sure that CreationScience bases this view on numerous familiar passages in the Christian Bible such as Jesus' claim that he is the "way, the truth and the life" and that "no one gets to Yahweh, except through Jesus" who serves as Yahweh's mediator.


Yet, Jesus was religiously Jewish and followed to Torah " to the letter", does CreationScience follow the Torah " to the letter" like Jesus, or does this persons use the same old excuse that Jesus came to do away with the "laws of the prophets"? If this CreationScience believes that, then what about the fact that the Biblical Jesus claims that he did not come to do away with the Jewish "laws" and that not one "word" of the Jewish "laws" would "pass away" until Yahweh's kingdom has been established?  I also think that this person's YouTube name sounds like a contradiction in itself. Creationism is not a "science". Creationists are largely against scientific findings, particular evolution.   What do you think?












Sincerely,


B.W.

No comments:

Post a Comment