Bart D. Ehrman discussions Part 2

Home
About Bart
Testimonials
Register
Login
Member Content
Support
Great Courses
Contact Bart
Main Website
Mobile Users

RSS

Twitter

Facebook

YouTube

Google+
  

Christianity in Antiquity (CIA): The Bart Ehrman Blog

Membership
why & how to join







Philanthropy
assist the needy

Latest Posts
member & public

Member Forum
discussions

Bart´s Books
reviews & publishers













   


Bart’s Blog
HomeBart’s BlogProblems with the Hebrew Bible Manuscripts (For Members) 
  
0 votes, average: 0.00 out of 50 votes, average: 0.00 out of 50 votes, average: 0.00 out of 50 votes, average: 0.00 out of 50 votes, average: 0.00 out of 5 (0 votes, average: 0.00 out of 5)
You need to be a registered member to rate this post.
Loading...



Problems with the Hebrew Bible Manuscripts (For Members)



You need to be logged in to see this part of the content. Please Login to access.
image_pdfimage_print









in
Share
.







Problems with the Hebrew Bible Manuscripts«
Jesus’ Inflammatory Words (For Members)»


7

JUN

2013

41
  
Comments
41  Comments
0  Trackbacks




Yentyl  June 7, 2013
Sigh. Why can’t life be easy?
Anyway, article from Wikipedia:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dead_Sea_scrolls#Biblical_books_found
Log in to Reply  



RonaldTaska  June 7, 2013
Another excellent question and excellent response. It’s odd that we have so many New Testament copies and so few Old Testament copies. I wonder why that occurred. Obviously, the two Testaments were not combined into one book for centuries. The history of the hows and whys of that combination would be interesting as well.
Log in to Reply  
Bart Ehrman

Bart Ehrman  June 8, 2013
It happened because Jewish scribes who copied a text (very accurately!) then destroyed it. No need for it, once it was reproduced….
Log in to Reply  


RonaldTaska  June 8, 2013
Aha! That is so helpful. I had no clue why there would be so few ancient Old Testament manuscripts. That explains it. Thanks, Ron
Log in to Reply  
 
 



toddfrederick  June 8, 2013
This is a question that I have to ask myself constantly regarding “problems” in the manuscripts:
It seems to me that the foundation of three great religions is based on the accuracy of sacred literature: the Hebrew and Christian Bibles, and the Qur’an. If this foundation is shaken, the religions fall.
Your job as a scholar is to examine the New Testament documents historically and textually using the tools of critical analysis. if the results of your work shows that the New Testament is unreliable then your are out of a job and the Christian religion (and other religions) is based on a lie.
Many have come to that conclusion and have renounced their faith.
My son asks me why I read your writings. Why don’t I read the works of people who believe that the bible is the source of life changing divine truth in the person of Jesus? I tell him that I read your writings because you tell us what is historically and textually correct without personal interpretation….that what you do is historical and linguistic and is not theology.
Would that be a good, yet simple, way to express what you do?
The real danger in scholarship of this sort is that we we may lose the baby in the bathwater.
If scripture is discredited then the message is also discredited.
I don’t think that such is true: we can study scripture honestly and still retain the truth of the message.
Log in to Reply  
Bart Ehrman

Bart Ehrman  June 8, 2013
I would say that Christianity historically has *not* been about the Bible; that’s only a modern development.
And I wouldn’t say that my views are presented without interpretation. I would say that my interpretations are guided by historical principles rather than religious or theological principles.
Log in to Reply  


toddfrederick  June 8, 2013
Thank you for your reply…it is a clarification I needed to confirm…that is: Christianity is based on more than a text.
Log in to Reply  
 
 



raskel  June 8, 2013
Bart:
 Unrelated question/ feel free to ignore/ but what was the meaning and status conferred on a person by virtue of being an apostle and what was the criterion for attributing it to a person in the early Church? Any good early primary sources available in translation addressing this issue?
Log in to Reply  
Bart Ehrman

Bart Ehrman  June 8, 2013
Apparently the title simply meant one who was “sent” by Christ on a mission; it came to be understood as one who was especially commissioned by Christ for the mission; and from there it came to mean one of the original leaders of the early Christian church and its mission. The only primary sources we have are those of the New Testament.
Log in to Reply  


raskel  June 8, 2013
Thank you. I was thinking more in terms of Greek Fathers and the meaning of Apostolic Succession-what exactly was being passed down.
Log in to Reply  
Bart Ehrman

Bart Ehrman  June 9, 2013
My sense is that the church fathers thought that an “apostle” was one of the original followers of Jesus who had a vision of him after his resurrection (so the eleven and Paul, basically).
Log in to Reply  
 
 
 



James Dowden  June 8, 2013
The thing I find amusing about Jeremiah is how the Alexandrian accretions (Baruch and the Epistle) got parcelled off into the Apocrypha, whilst the Palestinian accretions got left in the main text. If only someone would publish an English Bible with both sets of accretions removed. I suppose part of the problem there is that Baruch and the Epistle are really very readable when removed, whereas the Palestinian expansions would look more like the Additions to Esther in being totally disjointed.
Log in to Reply  

Brad Billips

Brad Billips  June 8, 2013
I’ve always been amused about how 1 Samuel 13:1 reads so differently in numerous Bible translations. Saul was how old and reigned how many years? Some Bibles just place “…” “…” for the years. Dr. Ehrman, do you have any other facts on that passage? Thanks.
Log in to Reply  
Bart Ehrman

Bart Ehrman  June 8, 2013
I’m afraid there are no facts to be had! The surviving witnesses don’t give us a number!
Log in to Reply  
 



Jerry  June 8, 2013
Bart,
 When will your introductory book about both the OT and NT of the Bible be out?
Jerry
Log in to Reply  
Bart Ehrman

Bart Ehrman  June 8, 2013
It is due out in November, I believe.
Log in to Reply  
 



seeker_of_truth  June 8, 2013
very interesting!
Log in to Reply  



mister.friendly  June 8, 2013
I am (as you know) very interested in all this. I am interested here in your comment that you, “slog through [Hebrew] with a dictionary…”
When dealing with an ancient language like this with – I presume – little in the way of extant examples of the language how easy is it to compile a reliable dictionnary? What is the meaning of the hebrew word ‘yom’? Does it mean day as we understand it or something else? What about ‘raqia’ often translated as firmament? And ‘tsela’ – does it mean or correspond to the English word ‘rib’?
It is not so much these particular examples which interest me (though they do) but more the general question which I might put to you thusly:
Having studied the NewTestament in Greek and being familiar with that language and now struggling with Biblical Hebrew what personal reflections might you share as to where the linguistic difficulties lie for the would be scholar of the Old Testament?
Hope that makes sense. Very keen to follow the thread you have already started here. Many thanks for all this.
Log in to Reply  
Bart Ehrman

Bart Ehrman  June 8, 2013
Yes, the linguistic difficulties of ancient Hebrew are much more pronounced than for ancient Greek (or ancient Latin, e.g.). That’s because we have so many, many more texts in Greek (and Latin) than in Hebrew, making it possible to establish the meanings of words with fair reliability. With Hebrew it is much more difficult. Linguists who specialize in ancient Semitic languages, as a result, need to rely heavily on cognate languages to help them establish the meaning of Hebrew roots. And so a real expert will also know Ugaritic, Akkadian, Sumerian, and possibly even other languages! It’s not for the faint of heart. And it is not guess work. It is unbelievably difficult and disciplined hard-core scholarship. I’ve known some of the top scholars of ancient Semitic languages. They are quite stunning in their knowledge and abilities.
Log in to Reply  


richard  October 10, 2014
Hello Doc Ehrman
“Linguists who specialize in ancient Semitic languages, as a result, need to rely heavily on cognate languages to help them establish the meaning of Hebrew roots”
any books you can recommend on this problem?
Log in to Reply  
Bart

Bart  October 10, 2014
Hmmm. Great question. I”m afraid I don’t know. If they do exist, they would presuppose knowledge of Akkadian, Ugaritic, and so on….
Log in to Reply  
 
 
 



John  June 9, 2013
Bart , do you think that there was coordination at some point between those responsible for the Christian and Hebrew Bible? If not they surely had a copy of the Hebrew when they presented the Christian Bible. Is it probable that the Hebrew was written in Babylon? Coincidentally the Old Testament references Egypt often , where they imported their worldview from through Canaan, so they are in essence condemning what they are entrenched in as if it were someone else but not them personally. Tragically the New Testament inherently possesses these same paradoxical attributes of blame, murder, and false worship, the same paradoxical attributes that Genesis describes as consequences of the freewill fruit of the tree of the knowledge of good and evil that manifested from Adam to Cain. Clearly there is no coincidence here, just fruit. Furthermore instead of interpreting the discovery of of the dead sea scrolls as proof validating the bible, couldn’t it instead be seen as the forgery factory is is?
Log in to Reply  
Bart Ehrman

Bart Ehrman  June 9, 2013
The Christian Bible was put together by church leaders who already had the “Old Testament” in its Greek translation. The Hebrew Bible was principally, but not exclusively, written in Israel itself. The Dead Sea Scrolls do not “validate” the Bible in the sense of showing that what it says is true; they simply show (a) that there were copies of the Bible very much like what one could find later, a thousand years earlier and (b) how some Jews were interpreting the Bible.
Log in to Reply  
 



SHameed01  July 9, 2013
Were the Deutrocanonical books originally part of the Hebrew Bible?
Log in to Reply  
Bart Ehrman

Bart Ehrman  July 9, 2013
No.
Log in to Reply  


SHameed01  July 9, 2013
Weren’t there Hebrew/Aramaic of the Deutrocanonical books found in the Dead Sea Scrolls?
Log in to Reply  
Bart Ehrman

Bart Ehrman  July 10, 2013
Nope.
Log in to Reply  


SHameed01  July 10, 2013
If so, how would you explain the following words from the following link: http://www.oswaldsobrino.com/2003/05/dead-sea-scrolls-and-deuterocanonical.html? ( see below)
Of the deuterocanonical books found among the Dead Sea Scrolls, Sirach is found in Hebrew, the Epistle of Jeremiah (Baruch 6) is found in Greek (although the editors state that it was “likely composed in Hebrew”), and Tobit is found in the Semitic languages of Aramaic and Hebrew (see DSC, pp. 599, 628, & 636). Some of those who raised doubts about the original language of some of the deuterocanonicals were fathers of the Church, who now stand corrected. As Joseph Fitzmeyer, S.J., who was part of the early editorial team working on the Dead Sea Scrolls, has written concerning the book of Tobit: “The fact that we now have both Aramaic and Hebrew forms of the book of Tobit reveals something about the book which neither Origen nor Jerome knew” (Joseph Fitzmeyer, S.J., The Dead Sea Scrolls and Christian Origins, p. 135 [Grand Rapids: Eerdmans 2000])
 

Bart Ehrman

Bart Ehrman  July 11, 2013
Veyr interesting. Thanks.
 
 
 
 
 



CalifiorniaPuma  December 17, 2013
As a scholar, how do you ascertain whether an ancient manuscript is the *original*, even if it dates to the appropriate period? We may have only copies of the Old & New Testament books, but if much older manuscripts came to light, could you or your colleagues ever determine that a manuscript was an original? It sounds problematic in any ancient setting. Sorry if you covered this before and I missed it.
Log in to Reply  
Bart Ehrman

Bart Ehrman  December 18, 2013
Yes, I’ve covered it a bit. My view is that it would be next to impossible to know if a copy from the right period is the original
Log in to Reply  
 



richard gills  September 16, 2014
does the torah say that parts of it were burnt?
Log in to Reply  
Bart Ehrman

Bart Ehrman  September 16, 2014
No.
Log in to Reply  
 



richard  October 22, 2014
Dr Ehrman
Genesis 28:20-21:
20Then Jacob made a vow, saying, “If God will be with me, and will keep me in this way that I go, and will give me bread to eat and clothing to wear, 21so that I come again to my father’s house in peace, then Yahweh shall be my God.
is yhwh understood here as a proper name for god or understood as an epithet?
 if as a proper name then was EL the dominant god who presided over yhwh?
Log in to Reply  
Bart

Bart  October 22, 2014
YHWH is almost always the personal name of God in the Hebrew Bible. El or Elohim sometimes seems to function as a name, but it typically is a noun meaning “God” — as here.
Log in to Reply  


richard  October 23, 2014
Dr Ehrman
how do you understand , ” YHWH shall be my God ” ?
is it something Jacob chooses to be his god or is it no choosing at all but simply the name for god in ” if god will be with me…”
in other words yhwh and elohim is the same name for the same god ?
i think there are some scholars who say yhwh was a junior diety and El fathered yhwh
Log in to Reply  
Bart

Bart  October 24, 2014
He is choosing which God (Elohim) to make his own, and chooses YHWH from among them.
Log in to Reply  
 
 
 



Blackie  October 25, 2014
Perhaps this question is out of left field. Was there a time when the ancient Hebrews polytheistical. Was Moses the founder of monotheism? In the epoch of henotheism and the birth of national gods was the storm god Yahweh promoted to Elohim and YHWH. Well God was surrounded by the heavenly host(angels of all ranks and service). There was deference for other spiritual beings but eventually only one multitasking god with auxiliaries.
Log in to Reply  
Bart

Bart  October 26, 2014
Yes, certainly many ancient Israelites believed there were many gods, and the prophets are good evidence that many Israelites worshiped multiple gods.
Log in to Reply  
 



Adam Beaven  March 1, 2015
Doctor Ehrman
is the suffering servant guilty of his own sins in is 53:10?
who is giving the soul as an offering?
 the sufferer ?
“If his soul doth make an offering for guilt, ”
who’s guilt? his guilt?
many jews are arguing that the suffering servant is a sinner
Log in to Reply  
Bart

Bart  March 3, 2015
His sins or the sins of the people (probably the latter)
Log in to Reply  
 

Subscribe to Comments

You must be logged in to post a comment.




Search by Keyword or User Name


  

Bart’s Recent Posts

My Memory Book, Chapter 6 on “Collective Memory”
April 22, 2015

My Memory Book: False Memories and the Life of Jesus
April 20, 2015

BBC Clip on “The Lost Gospels”
April 19, 2015

On Being Controversial
April 18, 2015

“The Same” Traditions in Oral Cultures
April 17, 2015

Differences Between Oral and Written Cultures
April 16, 2015

My Memory Book, Chapter 4 Again: The Death of Jesus
April 15, 2015

What Is A Memory?
April 13, 2015

Ramblings on Charity and Religion
April 11, 2015

Can A Made-Up Story Be A False Memory?
April 10, 2015

My Memory Book, Ch. 4a
April 10, 2015

My Memory Book, ch. 3
April 8, 2015

My Memory Book, chs. 1-2
April 7, 2015

How I’m Writing This Book
April 6, 2015

Sketch of My Memory Book
April 4, 2015

Archives
Select Month April 2015  (17) March 2015  (27) February 2015  (21) January 2015  (22) December 2014  (26) November 2014  (23) October 2014  (23) September 2014  (26) August 2014  (26) July 2014  (25) June 2014  (25) May 2014  (42) April 2014  (42) March 2014  (39) February 2014  (37) January 2014  (45) December 2013  (45) November 2013  (40) October 2013  (45) September 2013  (42) August 2013  (44) July 2013  (48) June 2013  (45) May 2013  (40) April 2013  (43) March 2013  (44) February 2013  (43) January 2013  (52) December 2012  (46) November 2012  (44) October 2012  (55) September 2012  (51) August 2012  (46) July 2012  (54) June 2012  (51) May 2012  (38) April 2012  (18) 

Bart’s Latest Books
How Jesus Became God
Ehrman sketches Jesus’s transformation from a human prophet to the Son of God exalted to divine status at his resurrection…
Learn More
The Bible: A Historical and Literary Introduction
Bart presents his long-awaited survey of the Bible. Comprehensive yet succinct, current in scholarship, rich in pedagogical tools, and easily accessible to students of all backgrounds…
Learn More
 

 



Latest Additions


My Memory Book, Chapter 6 on “Collective Memory”
The sixth chapter of my book Jesus Before the Gospels is tentatively entitled “Collective Memory and Early Recollections of...


My Memory Book: False Memories and the Life of Jesus
As I indicated in my previous two posts, the fifth chapter of the book I’m now writing, Jesus Before The Gospels, deals wit...

One Time Donation to Foundation

Since Jan. 1, 2013, CIA has collected $104,500 for charity. You can help too! Any one-time donation to the Bart Ehrman Foundation helps Bart’s select charities fight hunger and homelessness. The optional form on the right allows reoccurring donations of your preferred limit and choice!



This is not a membership registration. If you wish to become a full member, please click REGISTER from top navigation bar.

Monthy Reoccuring Donations



When Do Donations Recur?
DailyMonthlyYearly 
How Many Times to Recur?
Never End23456789101112 
Enter Your Donation Amount



Login

Username:

Password:


 Remember Me


Register | Lost your Password?
 

 
© 2012-2015 Christianity in Antiquity (CIA): The Bart Ehrman Blog by Innovative Design

Return to Top
                          


http://ehrmanblog.org/problems-with-the-hebrew-bible-manuscripts/













Home
About Bart
Testimonials
Register
Login
Member Content
Support
Great Courses
Contact Bart
Main Website
Mobile Users

RSS

Twitter

Facebook

YouTube

Google+
  

Christianity in Antiquity (CIA): The Bart Ehrman Blog

Membership
why & how to join







Philanthropy
assist the needy

Latest Posts
member & public

Member Forum
discussions

Bart´s Books
reviews & publishers













   


Bart’s Blog
HomeBart’s BlogProblems with the Hebrew Bible Manuscripts (For Members) 
  
0 votes, average: 0.00 out of 50 votes, average: 0.00 out of 50 votes, average: 0.00 out of 50 votes, average: 0.00 out of 50 votes, average: 0.00 out of 5 (0 votes, average: 0.00 out of 5)
You need to be a registered member to rate this post.
Loading...



Problems with the Hebrew Bible Manuscripts (For Members)



You need to be logged in to see this part of the content. Please Login to access.
image_pdfimage_print









in
Share
.







Problems with the Hebrew Bible Manuscripts«
Jesus’ Inflammatory Words (For Members)»


7

JUN

2013

41
  
Comments
41  Comments
0  Trackbacks




Yentyl  June 7, 2013
Sigh. Why can’t life be easy?
Anyway, article from Wikipedia:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dead_Sea_scrolls#Biblical_books_found
Log in to Reply  



RonaldTaska  June 7, 2013
Another excellent question and excellent response. It’s odd that we have so many New Testament copies and so few Old Testament copies. I wonder why that occurred. Obviously, the two Testaments were not combined into one book for centuries. The history of the hows and whys of that combination would be interesting as well.
Log in to Reply  
Bart Ehrman

Bart Ehrman  June 8, 2013
It happened because Jewish scribes who copied a text (very accurately!) then destroyed it. No need for it, once it was reproduced….
Log in to Reply  


RonaldTaska  June 8, 2013
Aha! That is so helpful. I had no clue why there would be so few ancient Old Testament manuscripts. That explains it. Thanks, Ron
Log in to Reply  
 
 



toddfrederick  June 8, 2013
This is a question that I have to ask myself constantly regarding “problems” in the manuscripts:
It seems to me that the foundation of three great religions is based on the accuracy of sacred literature: the Hebrew and Christian Bibles, and the Qur’an. If this foundation is shaken, the religions fall.
Your job as a scholar is to examine the New Testament documents historically and textually using the tools of critical analysis. if the results of your work shows that the New Testament is unreliable then your are out of a job and the Christian religion (and other religions) is based on a lie.
Many have come to that conclusion and have renounced their faith.
My son asks me why I read your writings. Why don’t I read the works of people who believe that the bible is the source of life changing divine truth in the person of Jesus? I tell him that I read your writings because you tell us what is historically and textually correct without personal interpretation….that what you do is historical and linguistic and is not theology.
Would that be a good, yet simple, way to express what you do?
The real danger in scholarship of this sort is that we we may lose the baby in the bathwater.
If scripture is discredited then the message is also discredited.
I don’t think that such is true: we can study scripture honestly and still retain the truth of the message.
Log in to Reply  
Bart Ehrman

Bart Ehrman  June 8, 2013
I would say that Christianity historically has *not* been about the Bible; that’s only a modern development.
And I wouldn’t say that my views are presented without interpretation. I would say that my interpretations are guided by historical principles rather than religious or theological principles.
Log in to Reply  


toddfrederick  June 8, 2013
Thank you for your reply…it is a clarification I needed to confirm…that is: Christianity is based on more than a text.
Log in to Reply  
 
 



raskel  June 8, 2013
Bart:
 Unrelated question/ feel free to ignore/ but what was the meaning and status conferred on a person by virtue of being an apostle and what was the criterion for attributing it to a person in the early Church? Any good early primary sources available in translation addressing this issue?
Log in to Reply  
Bart Ehrman

Bart Ehrman  June 8, 2013
Apparently the title simply meant one who was “sent” by Christ on a mission; it came to be understood as one who was especially commissioned by Christ for the mission; and from there it came to mean one of the original leaders of the early Christian church and its mission. The only primary sources we have are those of the New Testament.
Log in to Reply  


raskel  June 8, 2013
Thank you. I was thinking more in terms of Greek Fathers and the meaning of Apostolic Succession-what exactly was being passed down.
Log in to Reply  
Bart Ehrman

Bart Ehrman  June 9, 2013
My sense is that the church fathers thought that an “apostle” was one of the original followers of Jesus who had a vision of him after his resurrection (so the eleven and Paul, basically).
Log in to Reply  
 
 
 



James Dowden  June 8, 2013
The thing I find amusing about Jeremiah is how the Alexandrian accretions (Baruch and the Epistle) got parcelled off into the Apocrypha, whilst the Palestinian accretions got left in the main text. If only someone would publish an English Bible with both sets of accretions removed. I suppose part of the problem there is that Baruch and the Epistle are really very readable when removed, whereas the Palestinian expansions would look more like the Additions to Esther in being totally disjointed.
Log in to Reply  

Brad Billips

Brad Billips  June 8, 2013
I’ve always been amused about how 1 Samuel 13:1 reads so differently in numerous Bible translations. Saul was how old and reigned how many years? Some Bibles just place “…” “…” for the years. Dr. Ehrman, do you have any other facts on that passage? Thanks.
Log in to Reply  
Bart Ehrman

Bart Ehrman  June 8, 2013
I’m afraid there are no facts to be had! The surviving witnesses don’t give us a number!
Log in to Reply  
 



Jerry  June 8, 2013
Bart,
 When will your introductory book about both the OT and NT of the Bible be out?
Jerry
Log in to Reply  
Bart Ehrman

Bart Ehrman  June 8, 2013
It is due out in November, I believe.
Log in to Reply  
 



seeker_of_truth  June 8, 2013
very interesting!
Log in to Reply  



mister.friendly  June 8, 2013
I am (as you know) very interested in all this. I am interested here in your comment that you, “slog through [Hebrew] with a dictionary…”
When dealing with an ancient language like this with – I presume – little in the way of extant examples of the language how easy is it to compile a reliable dictionnary? What is the meaning of the hebrew word ‘yom’? Does it mean day as we understand it or something else? What about ‘raqia’ often translated as firmament? And ‘tsela’ – does it mean or correspond to the English word ‘rib’?
It is not so much these particular examples which interest me (though they do) but more the general question which I might put to you thusly:
Having studied the NewTestament in Greek and being familiar with that language and now struggling with Biblical Hebrew what personal reflections might you share as to where the linguistic difficulties lie for the would be scholar of the Old Testament?
Hope that makes sense. Very keen to follow the thread you have already started here. Many thanks for all this.
Log in to Reply  
Bart Ehrman

Bart Ehrman  June 8, 2013
Yes, the linguistic difficulties of ancient Hebrew are much more pronounced than for ancient Greek (or ancient Latin, e.g.). That’s because we have so many, many more texts in Greek (and Latin) than in Hebrew, making it possible to establish the meanings of words with fair reliability. With Hebrew it is much more difficult. Linguists who specialize in ancient Semitic languages, as a result, need to rely heavily on cognate languages to help them establish the meaning of Hebrew roots. And so a real expert will also know Ugaritic, Akkadian, Sumerian, and possibly even other languages! It’s not for the faint of heart. And it is not guess work. It is unbelievably difficult and disciplined hard-core scholarship. I’ve known some of the top scholars of ancient Semitic languages. They are quite stunning in their knowledge and abilities.
Log in to Reply  


richard  October 10, 2014
Hello Doc Ehrman
“Linguists who specialize in ancient Semitic languages, as a result, need to rely heavily on cognate languages to help them establish the meaning of Hebrew roots”
any books you can recommend on this problem?
Log in to Reply  
Bart

Bart  October 10, 2014
Hmmm. Great question. I”m afraid I don’t know. If they do exist, they would presuppose knowledge of Akkadian, Ugaritic, and so on….
Log in to Reply  
 
 
 



John  June 9, 2013
Bart , do you think that there was coordination at some point between those responsible for the Christian and Hebrew Bible? If not they surely had a copy of the Hebrew when they presented the Christian Bible. Is it probable that the Hebrew was written in Babylon? Coincidentally the Old Testament references Egypt often , where they imported their worldview from through Canaan, so they are in essence condemning what they are entrenched in as if it were someone else but not them personally. Tragically the New Testament inherently possesses these same paradoxical attributes of blame, murder, and false worship, the same paradoxical attributes that Genesis describes as consequences of the freewill fruit of the tree of the knowledge of good and evil that manifested from Adam to Cain. Clearly there is no coincidence here, just fruit. Furthermore instead of interpreting the discovery of of the dead sea scrolls as proof validating the bible, couldn’t it instead be seen as the forgery factory is is?
Log in to Reply  
Bart Ehrman

Bart Ehrman  June 9, 2013
The Christian Bible was put together by church leaders who already had the “Old Testament” in its Greek translation. The Hebrew Bible was principally, but not exclusively, written in Israel itself. The Dead Sea Scrolls do not “validate” the Bible in the sense of showing that what it says is true; they simply show (a) that there were copies of the Bible very much like what one could find later, a thousand years earlier and (b) how some Jews were interpreting the Bible.
Log in to Reply  
 



SHameed01  July 9, 2013
Were the Deutrocanonical books originally part of the Hebrew Bible?
Log in to Reply  
Bart Ehrman

Bart Ehrman  July 9, 2013
No.
Log in to Reply  


SHameed01  July 9, 2013
Weren’t there Hebrew/Aramaic of the Deutrocanonical books found in the Dead Sea Scrolls?
Log in to Reply  
Bart Ehrman

Bart Ehrman  July 10, 2013
Nope.
Log in to Reply  


SHameed01  July 10, 2013
If so, how would you explain the following words from the following link: http://www.oswaldsobrino.com/2003/05/dead-sea-scrolls-and-deuterocanonical.html? ( see below)
Of the deuterocanonical books found among the Dead Sea Scrolls, Sirach is found in Hebrew, the Epistle of Jeremiah (Baruch 6) is found in Greek (although the editors state that it was “likely composed in Hebrew”), and Tobit is found in the Semitic languages of Aramaic and Hebrew (see DSC, pp. 599, 628, & 636). Some of those who raised doubts about the original language of some of the deuterocanonicals were fathers of the Church, who now stand corrected. As Joseph Fitzmeyer, S.J., who was part of the early editorial team working on the Dead Sea Scrolls, has written concerning the book of Tobit: “The fact that we now have both Aramaic and Hebrew forms of the book of Tobit reveals something about the book which neither Origen nor Jerome knew” (Joseph Fitzmeyer, S.J., The Dead Sea Scrolls and Christian Origins, p. 135 [Grand Rapids: Eerdmans 2000])
 

Bart Ehrman

Bart Ehrman  July 11, 2013
Veyr interesting. Thanks.
 
 
 
 
 



CalifiorniaPuma  December 17, 2013
As a scholar, how do you ascertain whether an ancient manuscript is the *original*, even if it dates to the appropriate period? We may have only copies of the Old & New Testament books, but if much older manuscripts came to light, could you or your colleagues ever determine that a manuscript was an original? It sounds problematic in any ancient setting. Sorry if you covered this before and I missed it.
Log in to Reply  
Bart Ehrman

Bart Ehrman  December 18, 2013
Yes, I’ve covered it a bit. My view is that it would be next to impossible to know if a copy from the right period is the original
Log in to Reply  
 



richard gills  September 16, 2014
does the torah say that parts of it were burnt?
Log in to Reply  
Bart Ehrman

Bart Ehrman  September 16, 2014
No.
Log in to Reply  
 



richard  October 22, 2014
Dr Ehrman
Genesis 28:20-21:
20Then Jacob made a vow, saying, “If God will be with me, and will keep me in this way that I go, and will give me bread to eat and clothing to wear, 21so that I come again to my father’s house in peace, then Yahweh shall be my God.
is yhwh understood here as a proper name for god or understood as an epithet?
 if as a proper name then was EL the dominant god who presided over yhwh?
Log in to Reply  
Bart

Bart  October 22, 2014
YHWH is almost always the personal name of God in the Hebrew Bible. El or Elohim sometimes seems to function as a name, but it typically is a noun meaning “God” — as here.
Log in to Reply  


richard  October 23, 2014
Dr Ehrman
how do you understand , ” YHWH shall be my God ” ?
is it something Jacob chooses to be his god or is it no choosing at all but simply the name for god in ” if god will be with me…”
in other words yhwh and elohim is the same name for the same god ?
i think there are some scholars who say yhwh was a junior diety and El fathered yhwh
Log in to Reply  
Bart

Bart  October 24, 2014
He is choosing which God (Elohim) to make his own, and chooses YHWH from among them.
Log in to Reply  
 
 
 



Blackie  October 25, 2014
Perhaps this question is out of left field. Was there a time when the ancient Hebrews polytheistical. Was Moses the founder of monotheism? In the epoch of henotheism and the birth of national gods was the storm god Yahweh promoted to Elohim and YHWH. Well God was surrounded by the heavenly host(angels of all ranks and service). There was deference for other spiritual beings but eventually only one multitasking god with auxiliaries.
Log in to Reply  
Bart

Bart  October 26, 2014
Yes, certainly many ancient Israelites believed there were many gods, and the prophets are good evidence that many Israelites worshiped multiple gods.
Log in to Reply  
 



Adam Beaven  March 1, 2015
Doctor Ehrman
is the suffering servant guilty of his own sins in is 53:10?
who is giving the soul as an offering?
 the sufferer ?
“If his soul doth make an offering for guilt, ”
who’s guilt? his guilt?
many jews are arguing that the suffering servant is a sinner
Log in to Reply  
Bart

Bart  March 3, 2015
His sins or the sins of the people (probably the latter)
Log in to Reply  
 

Subscribe to Comments

You must be logged in to post a comment.




Search by Keyword or User Name


  

Bart’s Recent Posts

My Memory Book, Chapter 6 on “Collective Memory”
April 22, 2015

My Memory Book: False Memories and the Life of Jesus
April 20, 2015

BBC Clip on “The Lost Gospels”
April 19, 2015

On Being Controversial
April 18, 2015

“The Same” Traditions in Oral Cultures
April 17, 2015

Differences Between Oral and Written Cultures
April 16, 2015

My Memory Book, Chapter 4 Again: The Death of Jesus
April 15, 2015

What Is A Memory?
April 13, 2015

Ramblings on Charity and Religion
April 11, 2015

Can A Made-Up Story Be A False Memory?
April 10, 2015

My Memory Book, Ch. 4a
April 10, 2015

My Memory Book, ch. 3
April 8, 2015

My Memory Book, chs. 1-2
April 7, 2015

How I’m Writing This Book
April 6, 2015

Sketch of My Memory Book
April 4, 2015

Archives
Select Month April 2015  (17) March 2015  (27) February 2015  (21) January 2015  (22) December 2014  (26) November 2014  (23) October 2014  (23) September 2014  (26) August 2014  (26) July 2014  (25) June 2014  (25) May 2014  (42) April 2014  (42) March 2014  (39) February 2014  (37) January 2014  (45) December 2013  (45) November 2013  (40) October 2013  (45) September 2013  (42) August 2013  (44) July 2013  (48) June 2013  (45) May 2013  (40) April 2013  (43) March 2013  (44) February 2013  (43) January 2013  (52) December 2012  (46) November 2012  (44) October 2012  (55) September 2012  (51) August 2012  (46) July 2012  (54) June 2012  (51) May 2012  (38) April 2012  (18) 

Bart’s Latest Books
How Jesus Became God
Ehrman sketches Jesus’s transformation from a human prophet to the Son of God exalted to divine status at his resurrection…
Learn More
The Bible: A Historical and Literary Introduction
Bart presents his long-awaited survey of the Bible. Comprehensive yet succinct, current in scholarship, rich in pedagogical tools, and easily accessible to students of all backgrounds…
Learn More
 

 



Latest Additions


My Memory Book, Chapter 6 on “Collective Memory”
The sixth chapter of my book Jesus Before the Gospels is tentatively entitled “Collective Memory and Early Recollections of...


My Memory Book: False Memories and the Life of Jesus
As I indicated in my previous two posts, the fifth chapter of the book I’m now writing, Jesus Before The Gospels, deals wit...

One Time Donation to Foundation

Since Jan. 1, 2013, CIA has collected $104,500 for charity. You can help too! Any one-time donation to the Bart Ehrman Foundation helps Bart’s select charities fight hunger and homelessness. The optional form on the right allows reoccurring donations of your preferred limit and choice!



This is not a membership registration. If you wish to become a full member, please click REGISTER from top navigation bar.

Monthy Reoccuring Donations



When Do Donations Recur?
DailyMonthlyYearly 
How Many Times to Recur?
Never End23456789101112 
Enter Your Donation Amount



Login

Username:

Password:


 Remember Me


Register | Lost your Password?
 

 
© 2012-2015 Christianity in Antiquity (CIA): The Bart Ehrman Blog by Innovative Design

Return to Top
                          


http://ehrmanblog.org/problems-with-the-hebrew-bible-manuscripts/













Home
About Bart
Testimonials
Register
Login
Member Content
Support
Great Courses
Contact Bart
Main Website
Mobile Users

RSS

Twitter

Facebook

YouTube

Google+
  

Christianity in Antiquity (CIA): The Bart Ehrman Blog

Membership
why & how to join







Philanthropy
assist the needy

Latest Posts
member & public

Member Forum
discussions

Bart´s Books
reviews & publishers













   


Bart’s Blog
HomeBart’s BlogMy Problem with Fundamentalism 
  
0 votes, average: 0.00 out of 50 votes, average: 0.00 out of 50 votes, average: 0.00 out of 50 votes, average: 0.00 out of 50 votes, average: 0.00 out of 5 (0 votes, average: 0.00 out of 5)
You need to be a registered member to rate this post.
Loading...



My Problem with Fundamentalism

QUESTION:
You note that fundamentalism is dangerous and harmful. How do you define fundamentalism and why do you think it’s dangerous?

RESPONSE:
There are of course actual definitions of “fundamentalism” that you can find in scholarship on religion, but I sense that you’re asking more for a rough-and-ready description.   Years ago I started defining fundamentalism as “No fun, too much damn, and not enough mental.
When I was a fundamentalist myself (yet to be described) I understood it in a positive way.  Originally, in Christian circles, it referred to believers who held on to the “fundamentals” of the faith, which for us included such things as the inspiration of Scripture, the full deity of Christ, the Trinity, the virgin birth, the physical resurrection, and, well, probably a collection of other doctrines.  Fundamentalism, for us, was to be differentiated from liberalism, which had sacrificed these basic fundamental doctrines to the gods of modernity.  And we would have nothing of it.
Some scholars today understand fundamentalism to be an inordinately conservative branch of a religion (Christianity, Judaism, or Islam, for example) that stresses that it alone has the truth, that insists that everyone agrees with its perspective, and that….
FOR THE REST OF THIS POST, go to the Members’ Site.  If you don’t belong yet, JOIN NOW!!!


 
image_pdfimage_print









in
Share
.







Was Jesus a Great Moral Teacher? (For Members)«
My Problem with Fundamentalism (For Members)»


15

JAN

2013

3
  
Comments
3  Comments
0  Trackbacks




Just Sayin'  January 15, 2013
Isn’t fundamentalism more a way of life, a culture, than a fixed set of beliefs.
And you’ve said nothing about the secular fundamentalist mindset.
Log in to Reply  



ADAM: Quit beating around the bush  January 29, 2013
I AM NEW
 PLEASE EXPLAIN WHAT THE FOLLOWING MEANS:
Your comment is awaiting moderation
Log in to Reply  
Bart Ehrman

Bart Ehrman  January 29, 2013
It means that I personally (Bart Ehrman) have to approve a comment before allowing it to post on the site. I do not approve comments that are antagonistic, mean-spirited, or personally offensive, and I do not as a rule post comments that are attempts to proselytize or convert others to any particular religoin or religious perspective.
Log in to Reply  
 

Subscribe to Comments

You must be logged in to post a comment.




Search by Keyword or User Name


  

Bart’s Recent Posts

My Memory Book, Chapter 6 on “Collective Memory”
April 22, 2015

My Memory Book: False Memories and the Life of Jesus
April 20, 2015

BBC Clip on “The Lost Gospels”
April 19, 2015

On Being Controversial
April 18, 2015

“The Same” Traditions in Oral Cultures
April 17, 2015

Differences Between Oral and Written Cultures
April 16, 2015

My Memory Book, Chapter 4 Again: The Death of Jesus
April 15, 2015

What Is A Memory?
April 13, 2015

Ramblings on Charity and Religion
April 11, 2015

Can A Made-Up Story Be A False Memory?
April 10, 2015

My Memory Book, Ch. 4a
April 10, 2015

My Memory Book, ch. 3
April 8, 2015

My Memory Book, chs. 1-2
April 7, 2015

How I’m Writing This Book
April 6, 2015

Sketch of My Memory Book
April 4, 2015

Archives
Select Month April 2015  (17) March 2015  (27) February 2015  (21) January 2015  (22) December 2014  (26) November 2014  (23) October 2014  (23) September 2014  (26) August 2014  (26) July 2014  (25) June 2014  (25) May 2014  (42) April 2014  (42) March 2014  (39) February 2014  (37) January 2014  (45) December 2013  (45) November 2013  (40) October 2013  (45) September 2013  (42) August 2013  (44) July 2013  (48) June 2013  (45) May 2013  (40) April 2013  (43) March 2013  (44) February 2013  (43) January 2013  (52) December 2012  (46) November 2012  (44) October 2012  (55) September 2012  (51) August 2012  (46) July 2012  (54) June 2012  (51) May 2012  (38) April 2012  (18) 

Bart’s Latest Books
How Jesus Became God
Ehrman sketches Jesus’s transformation from a human prophet to the Son of God exalted to divine status at his resurrection…
Learn More
The Bible: A Historical and Literary Introduction
Bart presents his long-awaited survey of the Bible. Comprehensive yet succinct, current in scholarship, rich in pedagogical tools, and easily accessible to students of all backgrounds…
Learn More
 

 



Latest Additions


My Memory Book, Chapter 6 on “Collective Memory”
The sixth chapter of my book Jesus Before the Gospels is tentatively entitled “Collective Memory and Early Recollections of...


My Memory Book: False Memories and the Life of Jesus
As I indicated in my previous two posts, the fifth chapter of the book I’m now writing, Jesus Before The Gospels, deals wit...

One Time Donation to Foundation

Since Jan. 1, 2013, CIA has collected $104,500 for charity. You can help too! Any one-time donation to the Bart Ehrman Foundation helps Bart’s select charities fight hunger and homelessness. The optional form on the right allows reoccurring donations of your preferred limit and choice!



This is not a membership registration. If you wish to become a full member, please click REGISTER from top navigation bar.

Monthy Reoccuring Donations



When Do Donations Recur?
DailyMonthlyYearly 
How Many Times to Recur?
Never End23456789101112 
Enter Your Donation Amount



Login

Username:

Password:


 Remember Me


Register | Lost your Password?
 

 
© 2012-2015 Christianity in Antiquity (CIA): The Bart Ehrman Blog by Innovative Design

Return to Top
                          


http://ehrmanblog.org/my-problem-with-fundamentalism/










Home
About Bart
Testimonials
Register
Login
Member Content
Support
Great Courses
Contact Bart
Main Website
Mobile Users

RSS

Twitter

Facebook

YouTube

Google+
  

Christianity in Antiquity (CIA): The Bart Ehrman Blog

Membership
why & how to join







Philanthropy
assist the needy

Latest Posts
member & public

Member Forum
discussions

Bart´s Books
reviews & publishers













   


Bart’s Blog
HomeBart’s BlogMy Problem with Fundamentalism 
  
0 votes, average: 0.00 out of 50 votes, average: 0.00 out of 50 votes, average: 0.00 out of 50 votes, average: 0.00 out of 50 votes, average: 0.00 out of 5 (0 votes, average: 0.00 out of 5)
You need to be a registered member to rate this post.
Loading...



My Problem with Fundamentalism

QUESTION:
You note that fundamentalism is dangerous and harmful. How do you define fundamentalism and why do you think it’s dangerous?

RESPONSE:
There are of course actual definitions of “fundamentalism” that you can find in scholarship on religion, but I sense that you’re asking more for a rough-and-ready description.   Years ago I started defining fundamentalism as “No fun, too much damn, and not enough mental.
When I was a fundamentalist myself (yet to be described) I understood it in a positive way.  Originally, in Christian circles, it referred to believers who held on to the “fundamentals” of the faith, which for us included such things as the inspiration of Scripture, the full deity of Christ, the Trinity, the virgin birth, the physical resurrection, and, well, probably a collection of other doctrines.  Fundamentalism, for us, was to be differentiated from liberalism, which had sacrificed these basic fundamental doctrines to the gods of modernity.  And we would have nothing of it.
Some scholars today understand fundamentalism to be an inordinately conservative branch of a religion (Christianity, Judaism, or Islam, for example) that stresses that it alone has the truth, that insists that everyone agrees with its perspective, and that….
FOR THE REST OF THIS POST, go to the Members’ Site.  If you don’t belong yet, JOIN NOW!!!


 
image_pdfimage_print









in
Share
.







Was Jesus a Great Moral Teacher? (For Members)«
My Problem with Fundamentalism (For Members)»


15

JAN

2013

3
  
Comments
3  Comments
0  Trackbacks




Just Sayin'  January 15, 2013
Isn’t fundamentalism more a way of life, a culture, than a fixed set of beliefs.
And you’ve said nothing about the secular fundamentalist mindset.
Log in to Reply  



ADAM: Quit beating around the bush  January 29, 2013
I AM NEW
 PLEASE EXPLAIN WHAT THE FOLLOWING MEANS:
Your comment is awaiting moderation
Log in to Reply  
Bart Ehrman

Bart Ehrman  January 29, 2013
It means that I personally (Bart Ehrman) have to approve a comment before allowing it to post on the site. I do not approve comments that are antagonistic, mean-spirited, or personally offensive, and I do not as a rule post comments that are attempts to proselytize or convert others to any particular religoin or religious perspective.
Log in to Reply  
 

Subscribe to Comments

You must be logged in to post a comment.




Search by Keyword or User Name


  

Bart’s Recent Posts

My Memory Book, Chapter 6 on “Collective Memory”
April 22, 2015

My Memory Book: False Memories and the Life of Jesus
April 20, 2015

BBC Clip on “The Lost Gospels”
April 19, 2015

On Being Controversial
April 18, 2015

“The Same” Traditions in Oral Cultures
April 17, 2015

Differences Between Oral and Written Cultures
April 16, 2015

My Memory Book, Chapter 4 Again: The Death of Jesus
April 15, 2015

What Is A Memory?
April 13, 2015

Ramblings on Charity and Religion
April 11, 2015

Can A Made-Up Story Be A False Memory?
April 10, 2015

My Memory Book, Ch. 4a
April 10, 2015

My Memory Book, ch. 3
April 8, 2015

My Memory Book, chs. 1-2
April 7, 2015

How I’m Writing This Book
April 6, 2015

Sketch of My Memory Book
April 4, 2015

Archives
Select Month April 2015  (17) March 2015  (27) February 2015  (21) January 2015  (22) December 2014  (26) November 2014  (23) October 2014  (23) September 2014  (26) August 2014  (26) July 2014  (25) June 2014  (25) May 2014  (42) April 2014  (42) March 2014  (39) February 2014  (37) January 2014  (45) December 2013  (45) November 2013  (40) October 2013  (45) September 2013  (42) August 2013  (44) July 2013  (48) June 2013  (45) May 2013  (40) April 2013  (43) March 2013  (44) February 2013  (43) January 2013  (52) December 2012  (46) November 2012  (44) October 2012  (55) September 2012  (51) August 2012  (46) July 2012  (54) June 2012  (51) May 2012  (38) April 2012  (18) 

Bart’s Latest Books
How Jesus Became God
Ehrman sketches Jesus’s transformation from a human prophet to the Son of God exalted to divine status at his resurrection…
Learn More
The Bible: A Historical and Literary Introduction
Bart presents his long-awaited survey of the Bible. Comprehensive yet succinct, current in scholarship, rich in pedagogical tools, and easily accessible to students of all backgrounds…
Learn More
 

 



Latest Additions


My Memory Book, Chapter 6 on “Collective Memory”
The sixth chapter of my book Jesus Before the Gospels is tentatively entitled “Collective Memory and Early Recollections of...


My Memory Book: False Memories and the Life of Jesus
As I indicated in my previous two posts, the fifth chapter of the book I’m now writing, Jesus Before The Gospels, deals wit...

One Time Donation to Foundation

Since Jan. 1, 2013, CIA has collected $104,500 for charity. You can help too! Any one-time donation to the Bart Ehrman Foundation helps Bart’s select charities fight hunger and homelessness. The optional form on the right allows reoccurring donations of your preferred limit and choice!



This is not a membership registration. If you wish to become a full member, please click REGISTER from top navigation bar.

Monthy Reoccuring Donations



When Do Donations Recur?
DailyMonthlyYearly 
How Many Times to Recur?
Never End23456789101112 
Enter Your Donation Amount



Login

Username:

Password:


 Remember Me


Register | Lost your Password?
 

 
© 2012-2015 Christianity in Antiquity (CIA): The Bart Ehrman Blog by Innovative Design

Return to Top
                          


http://ehrmanblog.org/my-problem-with-fundamentalism/











Home
About Bart
Testimonials
Register
Login
Member Content
Support
Great Courses
Contact Bart
Main Website
Mobile Users

RSS

Twitter

Facebook

YouTube

Google+
  

Christianity in Antiquity (CIA): The Bart Ehrman Blog

Membership
why & how to join







Philanthropy
assist the needy

Latest Posts
member & public

Member Forum
discussions

Bart´s Books
reviews & publishers













   


Bart’s Blog
HomeBart’s BlogMy Problem with Fundamentalism (For Members) 
  
0 votes, average: 0.00 out of 50 votes, average: 0.00 out of 50 votes, average: 0.00 out of 50 votes, average: 0.00 out of 50 votes, average: 0.00 out of 5 (0 votes, average: 0.00 out of 5)
You need to be a registered member to rate this post.
Loading...



My Problem with Fundamentalism (For Members)



You need to be logged in to see this part of the content. Please Login to access.
image_pdfimage_print









in
Share
.







My Problem with Fundamentalism«
The Invention of Heaven and Hell»


15

JAN

2013

27
  
Comments
27  Comments
0  Trackbacks




B.E. Lewis  January 15, 2013
You’re speaking my language! I come come out of the exact background you just described. However, 6 years so far, studying in the academy has changed my understanding a bit.
Log in to Reply  



Adam  January 15, 2013
Thank you, very helpful!
Log in to Reply  



toddfrederick  January 15, 2013
What would be the more reasonable alternative to fundamentalism that retains intellectual respect for the role of scripture as a way to faith while accepting all that is good and true in modern science both social and physical?
Log in to Reply  
Bart Ehrman

Bart Ehrman  January 16, 2013
I’d say good, liberal and educated Christianity.
Log in to Reply  
 



John  January 15, 2013
The problem is that fundamentalism is filled with enough paradoxes to bring Russell or Schweitzer to their knees and for this alone their premise about truth you’ve listed above in the form of the classical narrative is reduced to a reductio ad absurdum.
Log in to Reply  



maxhirez  January 16, 2013
Hah! I have a t-shirt with an image of the devil burying dinosaur bones. Beneath is the tag line “TEACH THE CONTROVERSY!” I had a roommate who believed that. It’s my little way of pointing out the oddness of the view.
Log in to Reply  



Philo1  January 16, 2013
As a philosophy major, it is interesting to go back to my home church (fundamentalist) on a vacation break and experience the initial flood of hugs and “how’s school!” from church members, followed quickly by a cool, even frightened reaction when I inform them of my major. It has almost become a sport for me.
There also seems to be a bit of an allergic reaction to talk of biblical hermeneutics. I was taught to read the Bible “straight,” which is really another way of saying “read the Bible how we’ve taught you to read it.” Unfortunately, most fundamentalists don’t understand that they too are doing hermeneutics, only it is implicit and ignorant of it’s roots in history.
Log in to Reply  



Mikail78  January 16, 2013
Even though I’m no longer a fundamentalist ( I was one for over a decade) and not a Christian in any sense of the word, I have some beliefs on certain issues that would be considered “conservative”. For example, apart from rape or the woman’s life being in physical danger, I oppose abortion….but my reasons for my view are not religious. I feel I have thought about this for myself apart from religious dogma, and this is the view I’ve landed at. But Bart, I agree with pretty much everything you said, especially with your statement about the Bible’s silence on abortion. Contrary to the fundamentalist view, the Bible is not some clear moral guidebook. It’s just not, and people who make it out to be are kidding themselves.
Concerning the life issue, I’m amazed that both evangelical/fundamentalist Christians and devout Roman Catholics claim to be “pro-life” but are eager to support wars waged by the U.S. military. And what is the main function of the military? It’s killing people! And yet, these people call themselves pro-life but worship an institution that’s main focus is killing people! I also notice that many evangelicals are for the death penalty. In fact, when I was an evangelical and told other evangelicals that I wasn’t sure about the death penalty, it was almost as if my Christianity was being questioned! How come it doesn’t bother evangelicals that the death penalty allows for the possibility of innocent people dying? My personal theory is that the reason evangelical/fundamentalist Christians and devout Roman Catholics focus on abortion so much is the same reason they oppose many to all forms of contraception, porn, strip clubs, and the legalization of prostitution. The reason is that these people are sexually repressed, and want to force their sexually repressive views on others. Hey, if they can’t have fun in the area of sex, no one else should either! I think this is their subconscious reason. I could be wrong.
I hate both political parties (I’ve given up on voting, as it just doesn’t do any good), so I don’t want anyone to think I’m endorsing a political party with my next comment. I believe the rise of Sarah Palin is an example of why fundamentalism needs to be challenged, and challenged publicly. Here is a woman who is HEAVILY influenced by fundamentalist rapture theology and because of this she unconditionally supports Israel, and is a HUGE warmonger for Israel. What is truly scary is that this woman almost became vice president of the United States, which would have made her one heart beat away from the presidency! Yikes!!! Again, before anyone is tempted to accuse me of being a “democrat” or a “liberal”, I’m focusing on an individual here, and not a political party. As I said earlier, I hate both of them and their politicians!
Log in to Reply  



Joshua150  January 16, 2013
Yes.
Log in to Reply  



Ronck1  January 16, 2013
I’ve taught in a south side catholic school in Chicago while the neighborhood was changing (school no longer exists) and I continually found it impossible to discuss scripture with a fundamentalist high school student. No consideration was ever given to my point of view and they would go to extremes to defend their narrow and fixed views. Thanks, Prof. Bart. Ron
Log in to Reply  



wisemenwatch  January 16, 2013
“It not only destroys minds; it refocuses minds on nonsense (the world will end Sept 11-13, 1988), and fills minds with absurdities..”
Quite a lot of folks cannot handle the idea of having Christ in them.
Many years ago, a neighbor of mine was able to deny that she typed an anonymous letter to the school, saying that the school “will be brought down”. When the FBI investigated and found the letter matched the type on her typewriter, she was honestly able to deny it. It was the Holy Spirit’s work, not hers.
It creates a split in the self, an alternate personality, that is in reality only yourself. So when you leave fundamentalism, you have to quit referring to that part of yourself as “Jesus”. Or that part of someone else who claims to speak for Jesus, because He told them, instead of you.
The other thing you have to do is to quit thinking that the Bible is God talking.
Isn’t this the idolatry that the Bible itself warns against – creating an image and worshipping it as God?.
This is why your work is so important, Dr. Ehrman, much farther reaching than just the method of textual criticism or what is considered historical and what is not.
Log in to Reply  



timber84  January 16, 2013
Would 1st century Jews have interpreted Genesis as a literal six days? When did Christians start interpreting it as geological periods?
Log in to Reply  
Bart Ehrman

Bart Ehrman  January 16, 2013
Yes, they would and did. The geological period idea came in only when science showed conclusively that six days was impossible — i.e., the end of the 19th century and beginning of the 20th.
Log in to Reply  


samchahal  January 17, 2013
hi Bart so are you saying the writers of Genesis (Ezra and others) write the entire account as being literal? I have read that it was written as more of a parallel to the banishment of the Jews from the Temple in 586 bce?? they were using Babylonian myths so how could they have considered it literal or was this a later development by Jews by the 1st century once the OT was complete?
Log in to Reply  
Bart Ehrman

Bart Ehrman  January 17, 2013
Yes, I think they understood their accounts to be literal. Just as the Babylonian myths were not thought to be myths but descriptions of the way things were and are.
Log in to Reply  
 
 
 



CalifiorniaPuma  January 16, 2013
In addition to the dangers mentioned, the world-view of many fundamentalists (based on their interpretations of certain Bible verses ) fosters in them highly bellicose attitudes regarding the always volatile Middle East. They believe Armageddon is coming (and I suspect at lease a few of them would like to help it along). Enter Senator Chuck Hagel, Pres Obama’s nominee for Sec Def., and not someone likely to be a robotic yes man for the Israeli Defense Forces (should they want us to help them bomb Iran’s nuclear enrichment facilities). Now you have Christian Pastors, such as Don Stewart and Chuck Smith of Calvary Chapel slandering Senator Hagel as “anti-Jewish,” anti-Israel” and “anti-Semitic” just because Hagel (and Obama) want to try and avoid war there (and foil their Rapture/Armageddon hopes?)
Log in to Reply  



gavm  January 16, 2013
I do worry about Fundamentalist in the US. they are not as big a problem here in Australia. Europe has also generally over come evangelical fundamentalist Christianity however islam is becoming a problem there. keep up the good work Prof Erham
Log in to Reply  



Ed  January 16, 2013
Been there; got a t-shirt. I grew up in that environment. Of all the arguments for and against the existence of God, I found the lack of epistemological reciprocity and consistency to be the most damning. I simply could not overcome the nagging suspicion of why God would demand that I hold a belief based upon the very same epistemic standards by which I rejected other beliefs. I have, in my journey, attended several different Christian fundamentalist denominations each claiming to possess some slightly different sufficient condition for salvation that the others didn’t. It took most of my life to break free of this intellectual tyranny. Fundamentalism is dangerous indeed.
Log in to Reply  



agnossi  January 16, 2013
The infallibility of the Pope,
 The Divine Right of Kings,
“ll Duce ha sempre ragione.” = (Mussolini) is always right.,
“The Fuehrer (Hitler) is always right.”.
Quoting Professor Ehrman above: ” Fundamentalists do not want to promote thinking – even though they often say that they do; they want to promote abject obedience to authority, ”
Indeed, monotheism provides one philosophical and political basis for totalitarian, authoritarian dictatorship(s) – especially fundamentalist theocracy.
Log in to Reply  



Pofarmer  January 16, 2013
I don’t know if this is proper or allowed on the forums as I’ve only been a member a short time, but this fundamentalist thread kinda hit home. My wife is becoming more and more a fundamentalist Catholic, if you can imagine that, and getting more and more into the minutae of the Roman church, and less into reality, IMHO. Our middle boy has been having sleep anxiety, and it is getting worse, he is 11. He spends most nights in our bed at least part of the time. She recently came back from a “Marion Conference” in St. Louis, and is convinced we need to have our house blessed. I about flipped out. I’ve been pushing for a psychologist for two years. By the way, we have 3 kids, about 4 years or so ago they all came back from an extended stay at her parents over christmas totally flipped out and scared of going to bed. I think they got freaked out by a big circular rosary gathering or two, but can’t prove it as I wasn’t there. Her family is very devout Catholic. I am about to lose my mind over this. Oh, and I’ve found Prof Ehrman, Richard Colleir, And Prof Price, among others, who have given me some sanity back after I started reading the bible again in an attempt to see how the Roman Catholic Doctrines matched up with the bible and Apocraphies, and basically discovered they just made up whatever they liked. From there it’s been kind of a hard road.
Log in to Reply  


ecbrown88  January 17, 2013
I’m sorry to hear this. I don’t know what to advise. Are the children within a few years of adulthood? If so, maybe hold your tongue for now.
Log in to Reply  
 



RonaldTaska  January 16, 2013
Good post. I am particularly baffled by the widely circulating second amendment argument that we need guns to protect us from the government. Now, how is a gun, even an assault rifle, going to protect one from a government that has bombs, airplanes, drones, tanks, machine guns, and so on???? Thanks.
Log in to Reply  


Pofarmer  January 18, 2013
The centerpiece of every army is the infantryman, you can’t take or hold territory without him. It’s also generally assumed that the guys with the guns, tanks, drones. Etc, might be somewhat hesitant to use them on their own countrymen.
Log in to Reply  
 



DMiller5842  January 18, 2013
Did you see this?
http://www.examiner.com/article/kansas-speaker-o-neal-asks-house-gop-to-pray-for-obama-s-death
Log in to Reply  
Bart Ehrman

Bart Ehrman  January 18, 2013
Beyond belief!
Log in to Reply  



kbarbo  January 28, 2013
Sickening. Reminds me of my wife’s father who used to pray according to Scripture for the “destruction of the flesh so the spirit (of his children) might be saved.”
He interpreted this Scripture to mean that God would kill his children in a moment of repentance so that they would not be able to return to their sinful ways.
Log in to Reply  
 



brendarella  March 6, 2013
I ran away from the fundamentalist churches I attended. It got to a that point I felt like it was a cult. At least it was to me. I started listening to Bart & reading his books and became agnostic. But then I realized I didn’t have to throw God away, I started going to a United Methodist Church, that is very liberal. I was Methodist as a child. I find the people extremely caring and Christ like. I am really thrilled with this blog!!! I guess I am still hungry for knowledge, even if I am 60 years old!!!!
Log in to Reply  

Subscribe to Comments

You must be logged in to post a comment.




Search by Keyword or User Name


  

Bart’s Recent Posts

My Memory Book, Chapter 6 on “Collective Memory”
April 22, 2015

My Memory Book: False Memories and the Life of Jesus
April 20, 2015

BBC Clip on “The Lost Gospels”
April 19, 2015

On Being Controversial
April 18, 2015

“The Same” Traditions in Oral Cultures
April 17, 2015

Differences Between Oral and Written Cultures
April 16, 2015

My Memory Book, Chapter 4 Again: The Death of Jesus
April 15, 2015

What Is A Memory?
April 13, 2015

Ramblings on Charity and Religion
April 11, 2015

Can A Made-Up Story Be A False Memory?
April 10, 2015

My Memory Book, Ch. 4a
April 10, 2015

My Memory Book, ch. 3
April 8, 2015

My Memory Book, chs. 1-2
April 7, 2015

How I’m Writing This Book
April 6, 2015

Sketch of My Memory Book
April 4, 2015

Archives
Select Month April 2015  (17) March 2015  (27) February 2015  (21) January 2015  (22) December 2014  (26) November 2014  (23) October 2014  (23) September 2014  (26) August 2014  (26) July 2014  (25) June 2014  (25) May 2014  (42) April 2014  (42) March 2014  (39) February 2014  (37) January 2014  (45) December 2013  (45) November 2013  (40) October 2013  (45) September 2013  (42) August 2013  (44) July 2013  (48) June 2013  (45) May 2013  (40) April 2013  (43) March 2013  (44) February 2013  (43) January 2013  (52) December 2012  (46) November 2012  (44) October 2012  (55) September 2012  (51) August 2012  (46) July 2012  (54) June 2012  (51) May 2012  (38) April 2012  (18) 

Bart’s Latest Books
How Jesus Became God
Ehrman sketches Jesus’s transformation from a human prophet to the Son of God exalted to divine status at his resurrection…
Learn More
The Bible: A Historical and Literary Introduction
Bart presents his long-awaited survey of the Bible. Comprehensive yet succinct, current in scholarship, rich in pedagogical tools, and easily accessible to students of all backgrounds…
Learn More
 

 



Latest Additions


My Memory Book, Chapter 6 on “Collective Memory”
The sixth chapter of my book Jesus Before the Gospels is tentatively entitled “Collective Memory and Early Recollections of...


My Memory Book: False Memories and the Life of Jesus
As I indicated in my previous two posts, the fifth chapter of the book I’m now writing, Jesus Before The Gospels, deals wit...

One Time Donation to Foundation

Since Jan. 1, 2013, CIA has collected $104,500 for charity. You can help too! Any one-time donation to the Bart Ehrman Foundation helps Bart’s select charities fight hunger and homelessness. The optional form on the right allows reoccurring donations of your preferred limit and choice!



This is not a membership registration. If you wish to become a full member, please click REGISTER from top navigation bar.

Monthy Reoccuring Donations



When Do Donations Recur?
DailyMonthlyYearly 
How Many Times to Recur?
Never End23456789101112 
Enter Your Donation Amount



Login

Username:

Password:


 Remember Me


Register | Lost your Password?
 

 
© 2012-2015 Christianity in Antiquity (CIA): The Bart Ehrman Blog by Innovative Design

Return to Top
                          

http://ehrmanblog.org/my-problem-with-fundamentalism-for-members/













Home
About Bart
Testimonials
Register
Login
Member Content
Support
Great Courses
Contact Bart
Main Website
Mobile Users

RSS

Twitter

Facebook

YouTube

Google+
  

Christianity in Antiquity (CIA): The Bart Ehrman Blog

Membership
why & how to join







Philanthropy
assist the needy

Latest Posts
member & public

Member Forum
discussions

Bart´s Books
reviews & publishers













   


Bart’s Blog
HomeBart’s BlogMy Problem with Fundamentalism (For Members) 
  
0 votes, average: 0.00 out of 50 votes, average: 0.00 out of 50 votes, average: 0.00 out of 50 votes, average: 0.00 out of 50 votes, average: 0.00 out of 5 (0 votes, average: 0.00 out of 5)
You need to be a registered member to rate this post.
Loading...



My Problem with Fundamentalism (For Members)



You need to be logged in to see this part of the content. Please Login to access.
image_pdfimage_print









in
Share
.







My Problem with Fundamentalism«
The Invention of Heaven and Hell»


15

JAN

2013

27
  
Comments
27  Comments
0  Trackbacks




B.E. Lewis  January 15, 2013
You’re speaking my language! I come come out of the exact background you just described. However, 6 years so far, studying in the academy has changed my understanding a bit.
Log in to Reply  



Adam  January 15, 2013
Thank you, very helpful!
Log in to Reply  



toddfrederick  January 15, 2013
What would be the more reasonable alternative to fundamentalism that retains intellectual respect for the role of scripture as a way to faith while accepting all that is good and true in modern science both social and physical?
Log in to Reply  
Bart Ehrman

Bart Ehrman  January 16, 2013
I’d say good, liberal and educated Christianity.
Log in to Reply  
 



John  January 15, 2013
The problem is that fundamentalism is filled with enough paradoxes to bring Russell or Schweitzer to their knees and for this alone their premise about truth you’ve listed above in the form of the classical narrative is reduced to a reductio ad absurdum.
Log in to Reply  



maxhirez  January 16, 2013
Hah! I have a t-shirt with an image of the devil burying dinosaur bones. Beneath is the tag line “TEACH THE CONTROVERSY!” I had a roommate who believed that. It’s my little way of pointing out the oddness of the view.
Log in to Reply  



Philo1  January 16, 2013
As a philosophy major, it is interesting to go back to my home church (fundamentalist) on a vacation break and experience the initial flood of hugs and “how’s school!” from church members, followed quickly by a cool, even frightened reaction when I inform them of my major. It has almost become a sport for me.
There also seems to be a bit of an allergic reaction to talk of biblical hermeneutics. I was taught to read the Bible “straight,” which is really another way of saying “read the Bible how we’ve taught you to read it.” Unfortunately, most fundamentalists don’t understand that they too are doing hermeneutics, only it is implicit and ignorant of it’s roots in history.
Log in to Reply  



Mikail78  January 16, 2013
Even though I’m no longer a fundamentalist ( I was one for over a decade) and not a Christian in any sense of the word, I have some beliefs on certain issues that would be considered “conservative”. For example, apart from rape or the woman’s life being in physical danger, I oppose abortion….but my reasons for my view are not religious. I feel I have thought about this for myself apart from religious dogma, and this is the view I’ve landed at. But Bart, I agree with pretty much everything you said, especially with your statement about the Bible’s silence on abortion. Contrary to the fundamentalist view, the Bible is not some clear moral guidebook. It’s just not, and people who make it out to be are kidding themselves.
Concerning the life issue, I’m amazed that both evangelical/fundamentalist Christians and devout Roman Catholics claim to be “pro-life” but are eager to support wars waged by the U.S. military. And what is the main function of the military? It’s killing people! And yet, these people call themselves pro-life but worship an institution that’s main focus is killing people! I also notice that many evangelicals are for the death penalty. In fact, when I was an evangelical and told other evangelicals that I wasn’t sure about the death penalty, it was almost as if my Christianity was being questioned! How come it doesn’t bother evangelicals that the death penalty allows for the possibility of innocent people dying? My personal theory is that the reason evangelical/fundamentalist Christians and devout Roman Catholics focus on abortion so much is the same reason they oppose many to all forms of contraception, porn, strip clubs, and the legalization of prostitution. The reason is that these people are sexually repressed, and want to force their sexually repressive views on others. Hey, if they can’t have fun in the area of sex, no one else should either! I think this is their subconscious reason. I could be wrong.
I hate both political parties (I’ve given up on voting, as it just doesn’t do any good), so I don’t want anyone to think I’m endorsing a political party with my next comment. I believe the rise of Sarah Palin is an example of why fundamentalism needs to be challenged, and challenged publicly. Here is a woman who is HEAVILY influenced by fundamentalist rapture theology and because of this she unconditionally supports Israel, and is a HUGE warmonger for Israel. What is truly scary is that this woman almost became vice president of the United States, which would have made her one heart beat away from the presidency! Yikes!!! Again, before anyone is tempted to accuse me of being a “democrat” or a “liberal”, I’m focusing on an individual here, and not a political party. As I said earlier, I hate both of them and their politicians!
Log in to Reply  



Joshua150  January 16, 2013
Yes.
Log in to Reply  



Ronck1  January 16, 2013
I’ve taught in a south side catholic school in Chicago while the neighborhood was changing (school no longer exists) and I continually found it impossible to discuss scripture with a fundamentalist high school student. No consideration was ever given to my point of view and they would go to extremes to defend their narrow and fixed views. Thanks, Prof. Bart. Ron
Log in to Reply  



wisemenwatch  January 16, 2013
“It not only destroys minds; it refocuses minds on nonsense (the world will end Sept 11-13, 1988), and fills minds with absurdities..”
Quite a lot of folks cannot handle the idea of having Christ in them.
Many years ago, a neighbor of mine was able to deny that she typed an anonymous letter to the school, saying that the school “will be brought down”. When the FBI investigated and found the letter matched the type on her typewriter, she was honestly able to deny it. It was the Holy Spirit’s work, not hers.
It creates a split in the self, an alternate personality, that is in reality only yourself. So when you leave fundamentalism, you have to quit referring to that part of yourself as “Jesus”. Or that part of someone else who claims to speak for Jesus, because He told them, instead of you.
The other thing you have to do is to quit thinking that the Bible is God talking.
Isn’t this the idolatry that the Bible itself warns against – creating an image and worshipping it as God?.
This is why your work is so important, Dr. Ehrman, much farther reaching than just the method of textual criticism or what is considered historical and what is not.
Log in to Reply  



timber84  January 16, 2013
Would 1st century Jews have interpreted Genesis as a literal six days? When did Christians start interpreting it as geological periods?
Log in to Reply  
Bart Ehrman

Bart Ehrman  January 16, 2013
Yes, they would and did. The geological period idea came in only when science showed conclusively that six days was impossible — i.e., the end of the 19th century and beginning of the 20th.
Log in to Reply  


samchahal  January 17, 2013
hi Bart so are you saying the writers of Genesis (Ezra and others) write the entire account as being literal? I have read that it was written as more of a parallel to the banishment of the Jews from the Temple in 586 bce?? they were using Babylonian myths so how could they have considered it literal or was this a later development by Jews by the 1st century once the OT was complete?
Log in to Reply  
Bart Ehrman

Bart Ehrman  January 17, 2013
Yes, I think they understood their accounts to be literal. Just as the Babylonian myths were not thought to be myths but descriptions of the way things were and are.
Log in to Reply  
 
 
 



CalifiorniaPuma  January 16, 2013
In addition to the dangers mentioned, the world-view of many fundamentalists (based on their interpretations of certain Bible verses ) fosters in them highly bellicose attitudes regarding the always volatile Middle East. They believe Armageddon is coming (and I suspect at lease a few of them would like to help it along). Enter Senator Chuck Hagel, Pres Obama’s nominee for Sec Def., and not someone likely to be a robotic yes man for the Israeli Defense Forces (should they want us to help them bomb Iran’s nuclear enrichment facilities). Now you have Christian Pastors, such as Don Stewart and Chuck Smith of Calvary Chapel slandering Senator Hagel as “anti-Jewish,” anti-Israel” and “anti-Semitic” just because Hagel (and Obama) want to try and avoid war there (and foil their Rapture/Armageddon hopes?)
Log in to Reply  



gavm  January 16, 2013
I do worry about Fundamentalist in the US. they are not as big a problem here in Australia. Europe has also generally over come evangelical fundamentalist Christianity however islam is becoming a problem there. keep up the good work Prof Erham
Log in to Reply  



Ed  January 16, 2013
Been there; got a t-shirt. I grew up in that environment. Of all the arguments for and against the existence of God, I found the lack of epistemological reciprocity and consistency to be the most damning. I simply could not overcome the nagging suspicion of why God would demand that I hold a belief based upon the very same epistemic standards by which I rejected other beliefs. I have, in my journey, attended several different Christian fundamentalist denominations each claiming to possess some slightly different sufficient condition for salvation that the others didn’t. It took most of my life to break free of this intellectual tyranny. Fundamentalism is dangerous indeed.
Log in to Reply  



agnossi  January 16, 2013
The infallibility of the Pope,
 The Divine Right of Kings,
“ll Duce ha sempre ragione.” = (Mussolini) is always right.,
“The Fuehrer (Hitler) is always right.”.
Quoting Professor Ehrman above: ” Fundamentalists do not want to promote thinking – even though they often say that they do; they want to promote abject obedience to authority, ”
Indeed, monotheism provides one philosophical and political basis for totalitarian, authoritarian dictatorship(s) – especially fundamentalist theocracy.
Log in to Reply  



Pofarmer  January 16, 2013
I don’t know if this is proper or allowed on the forums as I’ve only been a member a short time, but this fundamentalist thread kinda hit home. My wife is becoming more and more a fundamentalist Catholic, if you can imagine that, and getting more and more into the minutae of the Roman church, and less into reality, IMHO. Our middle boy has been having sleep anxiety, and it is getting worse, he is 11. He spends most nights in our bed at least part of the time. She recently came back from a “Marion Conference” in St. Louis, and is convinced we need to have our house blessed. I about flipped out. I’ve been pushing for a psychologist for two years. By the way, we have 3 kids, about 4 years or so ago they all came back from an extended stay at her parents over christmas totally flipped out and scared of going to bed. I think they got freaked out by a big circular rosary gathering or two, but can’t prove it as I wasn’t there. Her family is very devout Catholic. I am about to lose my mind over this. Oh, and I’ve found Prof Ehrman, Richard Colleir, And Prof Price, among others, who have given me some sanity back after I started reading the bible again in an attempt to see how the Roman Catholic Doctrines matched up with the bible and Apocraphies, and basically discovered they just made up whatever they liked. From there it’s been kind of a hard road.
Log in to Reply  


ecbrown88  January 17, 2013
I’m sorry to hear this. I don’t know what to advise. Are the children within a few years of adulthood? If so, maybe hold your tongue for now.
Log in to Reply  
 



RonaldTaska  January 16, 2013
Good post. I am particularly baffled by the widely circulating second amendment argument that we need guns to protect us from the government. Now, how is a gun, even an assault rifle, going to protect one from a government that has bombs, airplanes, drones, tanks, machine guns, and so on???? Thanks.
Log in to Reply  


Pofarmer  January 18, 2013
The centerpiece of every army is the infantryman, you can’t take or hold territory without him. It’s also generally assumed that the guys with the guns, tanks, drones. Etc, might be somewhat hesitant to use them on their own countrymen.
Log in to Reply  
 



DMiller5842  January 18, 2013
Did you see this?
http://www.examiner.com/article/kansas-speaker-o-neal-asks-house-gop-to-pray-for-obama-s-death
Log in to Reply  
Bart Ehrman

Bart Ehrman  January 18, 2013
Beyond belief!
Log in to Reply  



kbarbo  January 28, 2013
Sickening. Reminds me of my wife’s father who used to pray according to Scripture for the “destruction of the flesh so the spirit (of his children) might be saved.”
He interpreted this Scripture to mean that God would kill his children in a moment of repentance so that they would not be able to return to their sinful ways.
Log in to Reply  
 



brendarella  March 6, 2013
I ran away from the fundamentalist churches I attended. It got to a that point I felt like it was a cult. At least it was to me. I started listening to Bart & reading his books and became agnostic. But then I realized I didn’t have to throw God away, I started going to a United Methodist Church, that is very liberal. I was Methodist as a child. I find the people extremely caring and Christ like. I am really thrilled with this blog!!! I guess I am still hungry for knowledge, even if I am 60 years old!!!!
Log in to Reply  

Subscribe to Comments

You must be logged in to post a comment.




Search by Keyword or User Name


  

Bart’s Recent Posts

My Memory Book, Chapter 6 on “Collective Memory”
April 22, 2015

My Memory Book: False Memories and the Life of Jesus
April 20, 2015

BBC Clip on “The Lost Gospels”
April 19, 2015

On Being Controversial
April 18, 2015

“The Same” Traditions in Oral Cultures
April 17, 2015

Differences Between Oral and Written Cultures
April 16, 2015

My Memory Book, Chapter 4 Again: The Death of Jesus
April 15, 2015

What Is A Memory?
April 13, 2015

Ramblings on Charity and Religion
April 11, 2015

Can A Made-Up Story Be A False Memory?
April 10, 2015

My Memory Book, Ch. 4a
April 10, 2015

My Memory Book, ch. 3
April 8, 2015

My Memory Book, chs. 1-2
April 7, 2015

How I’m Writing This Book
April 6, 2015

Sketch of My Memory Book
April 4, 2015

Archives
Select Month April 2015  (17) March 2015  (27) February 2015  (21) January 2015  (22) December 2014  (26) November 2014  (23) October 2014  (23) September 2014  (26) August 2014  (26) July 2014  (25) June 2014  (25) May 2014  (42) April 2014  (42) March 2014  (39) February 2014  (37) January 2014  (45) December 2013  (45) November 2013  (40) October 2013  (45) September 2013  (42) August 2013  (44) July 2013  (48) June 2013  (45) May 2013  (40) April 2013  (43) March 2013  (44) February 2013  (43) January 2013  (52) December 2012  (46) November 2012  (44) October 2012  (55) September 2012  (51) August 2012  (46) July 2012  (54) June 2012  (51) May 2012  (38) April 2012  (18) 

Bart’s Latest Books
How Jesus Became God
Ehrman sketches Jesus’s transformation from a human prophet to the Son of God exalted to divine status at his resurrection…
Learn More
The Bible: A Historical and Literary Introduction
Bart presents his long-awaited survey of the Bible. Comprehensive yet succinct, current in scholarship, rich in pedagogical tools, and easily accessible to students of all backgrounds…
Learn More
 

 



Latest Additions


My Memory Book, Chapter 6 on “Collective Memory”
The sixth chapter of my book Jesus Before the Gospels is tentatively entitled “Collective Memory and Early Recollections of...


My Memory Book: False Memories and the Life of Jesus
As I indicated in my previous two posts, the fifth chapter of the book I’m now writing, Jesus Before The Gospels, deals wit...

One Time Donation to Foundation

Since Jan. 1, 2013, CIA has collected $104,500 for charity. You can help too! Any one-time donation to the Bart Ehrman Foundation helps Bart’s select charities fight hunger and homelessness. The optional form on the right allows reoccurring donations of your preferred limit and choice!



This is not a membership registration. If you wish to become a full member, please click REGISTER from top navigation bar.

Monthy Reoccuring Donations



When Do Donations Recur?
DailyMonthlyYearly 
How Many Times to Recur?
Never End23456789101112 
Enter Your Donation Amount



Login

Username:

Password:


 Remember Me


Register | Lost your Password?
 

 
© 2012-2015 Christianity in Antiquity (CIA): The Bart Ehrman Blog by Innovative Design

Return to Top
                          


http://ehrmanblog.org/my-problem-with-fundamentalism-for-members/










Home
About Bart
Testimonials
Register
Login
Member Content
Support
Great Courses
Contact Bart
Main Website
Mobile Users

RSS

Twitter

Facebook

YouTube

Google+
  

Christianity in Antiquity (CIA): The Bart Ehrman Blog

Membership
why & how to join







Philanthropy
assist the needy

Latest Posts
member & public

Member Forum
discussions

Bart´s Books
reviews & publishers













   


Bart’s Blog
HomeBart’s BlogSpong’s New Book on John: Part Two 
  
0 votes, average: 0.00 out of 50 votes, average: 0.00 out of 50 votes, average: 0.00 out of 50 votes, average: 0.00 out of 50 votes, average: 0.00 out of 5 (0 votes, average: 0.00 out of 5)
You need to be a registered member to rate this post.
Loading...



Spong’s New Book on John: Part Two

Yesterday I wrote a post in which I began to discuss the recent Huffington Post article by John Shelby Spong in which he discusses his new book on John; the book is called The Fourth Gospel: Tales of a Jewish Mystic and the article can be found this address:  http://www.huffingtonpost.com/john-shelby-spong/gospel-of-john-what-everyone-knows-about-the-fourth-gospel_b_3422026.html?ref=topbar
Today I will finish out what I started to say yesterday.
Let me say again that I have long appreciated Spong’s work and am sympathetic to his mission.   He is trying to do from inside the church something very similar to what I am trying to do outside of it: help educated lay people outside the field of biblical scholarship see what scholars – believers and non-believers alike – are saying about the New Testament.
Since Spong is operating within the church, however, and sees himself as a Christian, some of his perspectives and goals are different from mine.   At the end of the day, he is interested in reforming Christianity in order to make it sensible for the twenty-first century.  That is not my goal, since I am not a Christian.  And it is this difference that,….

FOR THE REST OF THIS POST, go to the Members’ Site.  If you don’t belong yet, JOIN WILL YA????


 
image_pdfimage_print









in
Share
.







On the Cutting Room Floor: Part 1 (For members)«
Spong’s New Book on John: Part 2 (For members)»


14

JUN

2013

0
  
You must be logged in to post a comment.
 

Search by Keyword or User Name


  

Bart’s Recent Posts

My Memory Book, Chapter 6 on “Collective Memory”
April 22, 2015

My Memory Book: False Memories and the Life of Jesus
April 20, 2015

BBC Clip on “The Lost Gospels”
April 19, 2015

On Being Controversial
April 18, 2015

“The Same” Traditions in Oral Cultures
April 17, 2015

Differences Between Oral and Written Cultures
April 16, 2015

My Memory Book, Chapter 4 Again: The Death of Jesus
April 15, 2015

What Is A Memory?
April 13, 2015

Ramblings on Charity and Religion
April 11, 2015

Can A Made-Up Story Be A False Memory?
April 10, 2015

My Memory Book, Ch. 4a
April 10, 2015

My Memory Book, ch. 3
April 8, 2015

My Memory Book, chs. 1-2
April 7, 2015

How I’m Writing This Book
April 6, 2015

Sketch of My Memory Book
April 4, 2015

Archives
Select Month April 2015  (17) March 2015  (27) February 2015  (21) January 2015  (22) December 2014  (26) November 2014  (23) October 2014  (23) September 2014  (26) August 2014  (26) July 2014  (25) June 2014  (25) May 2014  (42) April 2014  (42) March 2014  (39) February 2014  (37) January 2014  (45) December 2013  (45) November 2013  (40) October 2013  (45) September 2013  (42) August 2013  (44) July 2013  (48) June 2013  (45) May 2013  (40) April 2013  (43) March 2013  (44) February 2013  (43) January 2013  (52) December 2012  (46) November 2012  (44) October 2012  (55) September 2012  (51) August 2012  (46) July 2012  (54) June 2012  (51) May 2012  (38) April 2012  (18) 

Bart’s Latest Books
How Jesus Became God
Ehrman sketches Jesus’s transformation from a human prophet to the Son of God exalted to divine status at his resurrection…
Learn More
The Bible: A Historical and Literary Introduction
Bart presents his long-awaited survey of the Bible. Comprehensive yet succinct, current in scholarship, rich in pedagogical tools, and easily accessible to students of all backgrounds…
Learn More
 

 



Latest Additions


My Memory Book, Chapter 6 on “Collective Memory”
The sixth chapter of my book Jesus Before the Gospels is tentatively entitled “Collective Memory and Early Recollections of...


My Memory Book: False Memories and the Life of Jesus
As I indicated in my previous two posts, the fifth chapter of the book I’m now writing, Jesus Before The Gospels, deals wit...

One Time Donation to Foundation

Since Jan. 1, 2013, CIA has collected $104,500 for charity. You can help too! Any one-time donation to the Bart Ehrman Foundation helps Bart’s select charities fight hunger and homelessness. The optional form on the right allows reoccurring donations of your preferred limit and choice!



This is not a membership registration. If you wish to become a full member, please click REGISTER from top navigation bar.

Monthy Reoccuring Donations



When Do Donations Recur?
DailyMonthlyYearly 
How Many Times to Recur?
Never End23456789101112 
Enter Your Donation Amount



Login

Username:

Password:


 Remember Me


Register | Lost your Password?
 

 
© 2012-2015 Christianity in Antiquity (CIA): The Bart Ehrman Blog by Innovative Design

Return to Top
                          


http://ehrmanblog.org/spongs-new-book-on-john-2/













Home
About Bart
Testimonials
Register
Login
Member Content
Support
Great Courses
Contact Bart
Main Website
Mobile Users

RSS

Twitter

Facebook

YouTube

Google+
  

Christianity in Antiquity (CIA): The Bart Ehrman Blog

Membership
why & how to join







Philanthropy
assist the needy

Latest Posts
member & public

Member Forum
discussions

Bart´s Books
reviews & publishers













   


Bart’s Blog
HomeBart’s BlogSpong’s New Book on John: Part Two 
  
0 votes, average: 0.00 out of 50 votes, average: 0.00 out of 50 votes, average: 0.00 out of 50 votes, average: 0.00 out of 50 votes, average: 0.00 out of 5 (0 votes, average: 0.00 out of 5)
You need to be a registered member to rate this post.
Loading...



Spong’s New Book on John: Part Two

Yesterday I wrote a post in which I began to discuss the recent Huffington Post article by John Shelby Spong in which he discusses his new book on John; the book is called The Fourth Gospel: Tales of a Jewish Mystic and the article can be found this address:  http://www.huffingtonpost.com/john-shelby-spong/gospel-of-john-what-everyone-knows-about-the-fourth-gospel_b_3422026.html?ref=topbar
Today I will finish out what I started to say yesterday.
Let me say again that I have long appreciated Spong’s work and am sympathetic to his mission.   He is trying to do from inside the church something very similar to what I am trying to do outside of it: help educated lay people outside the field of biblical scholarship see what scholars – believers and non-believers alike – are saying about the New Testament.
Since Spong is operating within the church, however, and sees himself as a Christian, some of his perspectives and goals are different from mine.   At the end of the day, he is interested in reforming Christianity in order to make it sensible for the twenty-first century.  That is not my goal, since I am not a Christian.  And it is this difference that,….

FOR THE REST OF THIS POST, go to the Members’ Site.  If you don’t belong yet, JOIN WILL YA????


 
image_pdfimage_print









in
Share
.







On the Cutting Room Floor: Part 1 (For members)«
Spong’s New Book on John: Part 2 (For members)»


14

JUN

2013

0
  
You must be logged in to post a comment.
 

Search by Keyword or User Name


  

Bart’s Recent Posts

My Memory Book, Chapter 6 on “Collective Memory”
April 22, 2015

My Memory Book: False Memories and the Life of Jesus
April 20, 2015

BBC Clip on “The Lost Gospels”
April 19, 2015

On Being Controversial
April 18, 2015

“The Same” Traditions in Oral Cultures
April 17, 2015

Differences Between Oral and Written Cultures
April 16, 2015

My Memory Book, Chapter 4 Again: The Death of Jesus
April 15, 2015

What Is A Memory?
April 13, 2015

Ramblings on Charity and Religion
April 11, 2015

Can A Made-Up Story Be A False Memory?
April 10, 2015

My Memory Book, Ch. 4a
April 10, 2015

My Memory Book, ch. 3
April 8, 2015

My Memory Book, chs. 1-2
April 7, 2015

How I’m Writing This Book
April 6, 2015

Sketch of My Memory Book
April 4, 2015

Archives
Select Month April 2015  (17) March 2015  (27) February 2015  (21) January 2015  (22) December 2014  (26) November 2014  (23) October 2014  (23) September 2014  (26) August 2014  (26) July 2014  (25) June 2014  (25) May 2014  (42) April 2014  (42) March 2014  (39) February 2014  (37) January 2014  (45) December 2013  (45) November 2013  (40) October 2013  (45) September 2013  (42) August 2013  (44) July 2013  (48) June 2013  (45) May 2013  (40) April 2013  (43) March 2013  (44) February 2013  (43) January 2013  (52) December 2012  (46) November 2012  (44) October 2012  (55) September 2012  (51) August 2012  (46) July 2012  (54) June 2012  (51) May 2012  (38) April 2012  (18) 

Bart’s Latest Books
How Jesus Became God
Ehrman sketches Jesus’s transformation from a human prophet to the Son of God exalted to divine status at his resurrection…
Learn More
The Bible: A Historical and Literary Introduction
Bart presents his long-awaited survey of the Bible. Comprehensive yet succinct, current in scholarship, rich in pedagogical tools, and easily accessible to students of all backgrounds…
Learn More
 

 



Latest Additions


My Memory Book, Chapter 6 on “Collective Memory”
The sixth chapter of my book Jesus Before the Gospels is tentatively entitled “Collective Memory and Early Recollections of...


My Memory Book: False Memories and the Life of Jesus
As I indicated in my previous two posts, the fifth chapter of the book I’m now writing, Jesus Before The Gospels, deals wit...

One Time Donation to Foundation

Since Jan. 1, 2013, CIA has collected $104,500 for charity. You can help too! Any one-time donation to the Bart Ehrman Foundation helps Bart’s select charities fight hunger and homelessness. The optional form on the right allows reoccurring donations of your preferred limit and choice!



This is not a membership registration. If you wish to become a full member, please click REGISTER from top navigation bar.

Monthy Reoccuring Donations



When Do Donations Recur?
DailyMonthlyYearly 
How Many Times to Recur?
Never End23456789101112 
Enter Your Donation Amount



Login

Username:

Password:


 Remember Me


Register | Lost your Password?
 

 
© 2012-2015 Christianity in Antiquity (CIA): The Bart Ehrman Blog by Innovative Design

Return to Top
                          


http://ehrmanblog.org/spongs-new-book-on-john-2/












Home
About Bart
Testimonials
Register
Login
Member Content
Support
Great Courses
Contact Bart
Main Website
Mobile Users

RSS

Twitter

Facebook

YouTube

Google+
  

Christianity in Antiquity (CIA): The Bart Ehrman Blog

Membership
why & how to join







Philanthropy
assist the needy

Latest Posts
member & public

Member Forum
discussions

Bart´s Books
reviews & publishers













   


Bart’s Blog
HomeBart’s BlogResurrection and Resuscitation 
  
0 votes, average: 0.00 out of 50 votes, average: 0.00 out of 50 votes, average: 0.00 out of 50 votes, average: 0.00 out of 50 votes, average: 0.00 out of 5 (0 votes, average: 0.00 out of 5)
You need to be a registered member to rate this post.
Loading...



Resurrection and Resuscitation

The following is just a small chunk that I’ve written up for my Bible Introduction on the idea of “resurrection” — in relationship to other views of afterlife in the Bible.   It’s short, but it’s the last sentence that is very much worth thinking about (most people haven’t thought about it; I know I never did, until fairly recently).
**************************************************************************************************************
Many readers of the Bible are surprised to learn that the ideas of the afterlife in the Hebrew Bible are not closely related to what most people think today.   The idea that after you die, your soul goes either to heaven or hell (or even purgatory) is not rooted in the Jewish Scriptures.  The few passages that refer to an afterlife in the Hebrew Bible assume that after death, a person goes to “Sheol.”  That is not the Hebrew equivalent of “hell” – a place of punishment for the wicked.  It is the place that everyone goes, good or evil….
FOR THE REST OF THIS POST, go to the Members’ Site.  Or you may NEVER KNOW what happens to you when you DIE!  So if you don’t belong yet, JOIN!

 
image_pdfimage_print









in
Share
.







Autobiographical. Metzger and Me: My PhD Exams«
Resurrection and Resuscitation (for members)»


25

JUL

2012

0
  
You must be logged in to post a comment.
 

Search by Keyword or User Name


  

Bart’s Recent Posts

My Memory Book, Chapter 6 on “Collective Memory”
April 22, 2015

My Memory Book: False Memories and the Life of Jesus
April 20, 2015

BBC Clip on “The Lost Gospels”
April 19, 2015

On Being Controversial
April 18, 2015

“The Same” Traditions in Oral Cultures
April 17, 2015

Differences Between Oral and Written Cultures
April 16, 2015

My Memory Book, Chapter 4 Again: The Death of Jesus
April 15, 2015

What Is A Memory?
April 13, 2015

Ramblings on Charity and Religion
April 11, 2015

Can A Made-Up Story Be A False Memory?
April 10, 2015

My Memory Book, Ch. 4a
April 10, 2015

My Memory Book, ch. 3
April 8, 2015

My Memory Book, chs. 1-2
April 7, 2015

How I’m Writing This Book
April 6, 2015

Sketch of My Memory Book
April 4, 2015

Archives
Select Month April 2015  (17) March 2015  (27) February 2015  (21) January 2015  (22) December 2014  (26) November 2014  (23) October 2014  (23) September 2014  (26) August 2014  (26) July 2014  (25) June 2014  (25) May 2014  (42) April 2014  (42) March 2014  (39) February 2014  (37) January 2014  (45) December 2013  (45) November 2013  (40) October 2013  (45) September 2013  (42) August 2013  (44) July 2013  (48) June 2013  (45) May 2013  (40) April 2013  (43) March 2013  (44) February 2013  (43) January 2013  (52) December 2012  (46) November 2012  (44) October 2012  (55) September 2012  (51) August 2012  (46) July 2012  (54) June 2012  (51) May 2012  (38) April 2012  (18) 

Bart’s Latest Books
How Jesus Became God
Ehrman sketches Jesus’s transformation from a human prophet to the Son of God exalted to divine status at his resurrection…
Learn More
The Bible: A Historical and Literary Introduction
Bart presents his long-awaited survey of the Bible. Comprehensive yet succinct, current in scholarship, rich in pedagogical tools, and easily accessible to students of all backgrounds…
Learn More
 

 



Latest Additions


My Memory Book, Chapter 6 on “Collective Memory”
The sixth chapter of my book Jesus Before the Gospels is tentatively entitled “Collective Memory and Early Recollections of...


My Memory Book: False Memories and the Life of Jesus
As I indicated in my previous two posts, the fifth chapter of the book I’m now writing, Jesus Before The Gospels, deals wit...

One Time Donation to Foundation

Since Jan. 1, 2013, CIA has collected $104,500 for charity. You can help too! Any one-time donation to the Bart Ehrman Foundation helps Bart’s select charities fight hunger and homelessness. The optional form on the right allows reoccurring donations of your preferred limit and choice!



This is not a membership registration. If you wish to become a full member, please click REGISTER from top navigation bar.

Monthy Reoccuring Donations



When Do Donations Recur?
DailyMonthlyYearly 
How Many Times to Recur?
Never End23456789101112 
Enter Your Donation Amount



Login

Username:

Password:


 Remember Me


Register | Lost your Password?
 

 
© 2012-2015 Christianity in Antiquity (CIA): The Bart Ehrman Blog by Innovative Design

Return to Top
                          



http://ehrmanblog.org/resurrection-and-resuscitation/














Home
About Bart
Testimonials
Register
Login
Member Content
Support
Great Courses
Contact Bart
Main Website
Mobile Users

RSS

Twitter

Facebook

YouTube

Google+
  

Christianity in Antiquity (CIA): The Bart Ehrman Blog

Membership
why & how to join







Philanthropy
assist the needy

Latest Posts
member & public

Member Forum
discussions

Bart´s Books
reviews & publishers













   


Bart’s Blog
HomeBart’s BlogResurrection and Resuscitation 
  
0 votes, average: 0.00 out of 50 votes, average: 0.00 out of 50 votes, average: 0.00 out of 50 votes, average: 0.00 out of 50 votes, average: 0.00 out of 5 (0 votes, average: 0.00 out of 5)
You need to be a registered member to rate this post.
Loading...



Resurrection and Resuscitation

The following is just a small chunk that I’ve written up for my Bible Introduction on the idea of “resurrection” — in relationship to other views of afterlife in the Bible.   It’s short, but it’s the last sentence that is very much worth thinking about (most people haven’t thought about it; I know I never did, until fairly recently).
**************************************************************************************************************
Many readers of the Bible are surprised to learn that the ideas of the afterlife in the Hebrew Bible are not closely related to what most people think today.   The idea that after you die, your soul goes either to heaven or hell (or even purgatory) is not rooted in the Jewish Scriptures.  The few passages that refer to an afterlife in the Hebrew Bible assume that after death, a person goes to “Sheol.”  That is not the Hebrew equivalent of “hell” – a place of punishment for the wicked.  It is the place that everyone goes, good or evil….
FOR THE REST OF THIS POST, go to the Members’ Site.  Or you may NEVER KNOW what happens to you when you DIE!  So if you don’t belong yet, JOIN!

 
image_pdfimage_print









in
Share
.







Autobiographical. Metzger and Me: My PhD Exams«
Resurrection and Resuscitation (for members)»


25

JUL

2012

0
  
You must be logged in to post a comment.
 

Search by Keyword or User Name


  

Bart’s Recent Posts

My Memory Book, Chapter 6 on “Collective Memory”
April 22, 2015

My Memory Book: False Memories and the Life of Jesus
April 20, 2015

BBC Clip on “The Lost Gospels”
April 19, 2015

On Being Controversial
April 18, 2015

“The Same” Traditions in Oral Cultures
April 17, 2015

Differences Between Oral and Written Cultures
April 16, 2015

My Memory Book, Chapter 4 Again: The Death of Jesus
April 15, 2015

What Is A Memory?
April 13, 2015

Ramblings on Charity and Religion
April 11, 2015

Can A Made-Up Story Be A False Memory?
April 10, 2015

My Memory Book, Ch. 4a
April 10, 2015

My Memory Book, ch. 3
April 8, 2015

My Memory Book, chs. 1-2
April 7, 2015

How I’m Writing This Book
April 6, 2015

Sketch of My Memory Book
April 4, 2015

Archives
Select Month April 2015  (17) March 2015  (27) February 2015  (21) January 2015  (22) December 2014  (26) November 2014  (23) October 2014  (23) September 2014  (26) August 2014  (26) July 2014  (25) June 2014  (25) May 2014  (42) April 2014  (42) March 2014  (39) February 2014  (37) January 2014  (45) December 2013  (45) November 2013  (40) October 2013  (45) September 2013  (42) August 2013  (44) July 2013  (48) June 2013  (45) May 2013  (40) April 2013  (43) March 2013  (44) February 2013  (43) January 2013  (52) December 2012  (46) November 2012  (44) October 2012  (55) September 2012  (51) August 2012  (46) July 2012  (54) June 2012  (51) May 2012  (38) April 2012  (18) 

Bart’s Latest Books
How Jesus Became God
Ehrman sketches Jesus’s transformation from a human prophet to the Son of God exalted to divine status at his resurrection…
Learn More
The Bible: A Historical and Literary Introduction
Bart presents his long-awaited survey of the Bible. Comprehensive yet succinct, current in scholarship, rich in pedagogical tools, and easily accessible to students of all backgrounds…
Learn More
 

 



Latest Additions


My Memory Book, Chapter 6 on “Collective Memory”
The sixth chapter of my book Jesus Before the Gospels is tentatively entitled “Collective Memory and Early Recollections of...


My Memory Book: False Memories and the Life of Jesus
As I indicated in my previous two posts, the fifth chapter of the book I’m now writing, Jesus Before The Gospels, deals wit...

One Time Donation to Foundation

Since Jan. 1, 2013, CIA has collected $104,500 for charity. You can help too! Any one-time donation to the Bart Ehrman Foundation helps Bart’s select charities fight hunger and homelessness. The optional form on the right allows reoccurring donations of your preferred limit and choice!



This is not a membership registration. If you wish to become a full member, please click REGISTER from top navigation bar.

Monthy Reoccuring Donations



When Do Donations Recur?
DailyMonthlyYearly 
How Many Times to Recur?
Never End23456789101112 
Enter Your Donation Amount



Login

Username:

Password:


 Remember Me


Register | Lost your Password?
 

 
© 2012-2015 Christianity in Antiquity (CIA): The Bart Ehrman Blog by Innovative Design

Return to Top
                          


http://ehrmanblog.org/resurrection-and-resuscitation/











Home
About Bart
Testimonials
Register
Login
Member Content
Support
Great Courses
Contact Bart
Main Website
Mobile Users

RSS

Twitter

Facebook

YouTube

Google+
  

Christianity in Antiquity (CIA): The Bart Ehrman Blog

Membership
why & how to join







Philanthropy
assist the needy

Latest Posts
member & public

Member Forum
discussions

Bart´s Books
reviews & publishers













   


Bart’s Blog
HomeBart’s BlogThe Gospel According to Mel 
  
0 votes, average: 0.00 out of 50 votes, average: 0.00 out of 50 votes, average: 0.00 out of 50 votes, average: 0.00 out of 50 votes, average: 0.00 out of 5 (0 votes, average: 0.00 out of 5)
You need to be a registered member to rate this post.
Loading...



The Gospel According to Mel

I mentioned in my post yesterday that I do not much like Mel Gibson’s “The Passion of the Christ.”  Now that I think about it, I don’t think I know a single scholar of the historical Jesus, or of the New Testament, or – well of any academic topic taught at universities whom I’ve ever spoken with – who liked the movie.   Most of the objections raised to it have involved its portrayals of Jews and its apparent embrace of the kinds of anti-Semitism that is all too easy to overlook, and therefore re-embrace without thinking.
I am completely sympathetic with these objections.  But here I’ll talk about other issues.   I find the movie problematic (also) because Gibson maintained *both* that he stayed faithful to the accounts of the Gospels *and* that he showed events “as they really were.”   Neither is true.
First, as to being faithful to the Gospel accounts.   The one thing that struck every single person who saw the movie and that kept most everyone else away from seeing it was the horrifically gruesome violence done to the body of Jesus, not only at the crucifixion but even more during the episode of his flogging, where he is literally beaten to a pulp until he can’t stand, but then finds strength to arise and more or less tell them to bring it on again some more (he HAS to suffer, so he’s in for the full treatment – KEEP IT COMIN’ BOYS), which they do, blow after blow after blow until he is little more than a throbbing blob of blood.
So, is this being faithful to the Gospels?  Actually…

FOR THE REST OF THIS POST, go to the Members’ Site.  If you don’t belong yet, JOIN, WILL YA????


 
image_pdfimage_print









in
Share
.







When Time Stood Still«
The Gospel according to Mel (For Members)»


18

OCT

2013

6
  
Comments
6  Comments
0  Trackbacks




nevernine  May 16, 2014
Please help, I am totally lost on the members page.
 I am a member. But when I go to finish (say, this article, on the Mel Gibson film)
 and get to the “Go to members site” to finish it, I cannot get there.
 Where do I go to at that point to hook up the rest of the article?
Thank you.
 Je.
Log in to Reply  
Bart Ehrman

Bart Ehrman  May 16, 2014
Maybe you should just look at the “For Members Only” posting instead of the one for everyone?
Log in to Reply  
 

acircharo

acircharo  June 12, 2014
Actually, I think there is a problem with this. I am registered, signed in, and clicked on Member’s Content. When I go back to “Films About Jesus” and return to The Gospel According to Mel, I come to the same place, indicating if I want to finish the article, I need to go to Member’s Site. Each time the same thing occurs.
Log in to Reply  
Bart Ehrman

Bart Ehrman  June 13, 2014
We’ll look into it.
Log in to Reply  


prlaba  July 1, 2014
Same issue for me. Logged in as member but can’t see your ‘for members’ text for this post.
Log in to Reply  


prlaba  July 1, 2014
Seems to be resolved now, with links to both public and ‘for members only’ versions of your post on this topic.
Log in to Reply  
 
 
 

Subscribe to Comments

You must be logged in to post a comment.




Search by Keyword or User Name


  

Bart’s Recent Posts

My Memory Book, Chapter 6 on “Collective Memory”
April 22, 2015

My Memory Book: False Memories and the Life of Jesus
April 20, 2015

BBC Clip on “The Lost Gospels”
April 19, 2015

On Being Controversial
April 18, 2015

“The Same” Traditions in Oral Cultures
April 17, 2015

Differences Between Oral and Written Cultures
April 16, 2015

My Memory Book, Chapter 4 Again: The Death of Jesus
April 15, 2015

What Is A Memory?
April 13, 2015

Ramblings on Charity and Religion
April 11, 2015

Can A Made-Up Story Be A False Memory?
April 10, 2015

My Memory Book, Ch. 4a
April 10, 2015

My Memory Book, ch. 3
April 8, 2015

My Memory Book, chs. 1-2
April 7, 2015

How I’m Writing This Book
April 6, 2015

Sketch of My Memory Book
April 4, 2015

Archives
Select Month April 2015  (17) March 2015  (27) February 2015  (21) January 2015  (22) December 2014  (26) November 2014  (23) October 2014  (23) September 2014  (26) August 2014  (26) July 2014  (25) June 2014  (25) May 2014  (42) April 2014  (42) March 2014  (39) February 2014  (37) January 2014  (45) December 2013  (45) November 2013  (40) October 2013  (45) September 2013  (42) August 2013  (44) July 2013  (48) June 2013  (45) May 2013  (40) April 2013  (43) March 2013  (44) February 2013  (43) January 2013  (52) December 2012  (46) November 2012  (44) October 2012  (55) September 2012  (51) August 2012  (46) July 2012  (54) June 2012  (51) May 2012  (38) April 2012  (18) 

Bart’s Latest Books
How Jesus Became God
Ehrman sketches Jesus’s transformation from a human prophet to the Son of God exalted to divine status at his resurrection…
Learn More
The Bible: A Historical and Literary Introduction
Bart presents his long-awaited survey of the Bible. Comprehensive yet succinct, current in scholarship, rich in pedagogical tools, and easily accessible to students of all backgrounds…
Learn More
 

 



Latest Additions


My Memory Book, Chapter 6 on “Collective Memory”
The sixth chapter of my book Jesus Before the Gospels is tentatively entitled “Collective Memory and Early Recollections of...


My Memory Book: False Memories and the Life of Jesus
As I indicated in my previous two posts, the fifth chapter of the book I’m now writing, Jesus Before The Gospels, deals wit...

One Time Donation to Foundation

Since Jan. 1, 2013, CIA has collected $104,500 for charity. You can help too! Any one-time donation to the Bart Ehrman Foundation helps Bart’s select charities fight hunger and homelessness. The optional form on the right allows reoccurring donations of your preferred limit and choice!



This is not a membership registration. If you wish to become a full member, please click REGISTER from top navigation bar.

Monthy Reoccuring Donations



When Do Donations Recur?
DailyMonthlyYearly 
How Many Times to Recur?
Never End23456789101112 
Enter Your Donation Amount



Login

Username:

Password:


 Remember Me


Register | Lost your Password?
 

 
© 2012-2015 Christianity in Antiquity (CIA): The Bart Ehrman Blog by Innovative Design

Return to Top
                          

http://ehrmanblog.org/gospel-according-mel/












Home
About Bart
Testimonials
Register
Login
Member Content
Support
Great Courses
Contact Bart
Main Website
Mobile Users

RSS

Twitter

Facebook

YouTube

Google+
  

Christianity in Antiquity (CIA): The Bart Ehrman Blog

Membership
why & how to join







Philanthropy
assist the needy

Latest Posts
member & public

Member Forum
discussions

Bart´s Books
reviews & publishers













   


Bart’s Blog
HomeBart’s BlogThe Gospel According to Mel 
  
0 votes, average: 0.00 out of 50 votes, average: 0.00 out of 50 votes, average: 0.00 out of 50 votes, average: 0.00 out of 50 votes, average: 0.00 out of 5 (0 votes, average: 0.00 out of 5)
You need to be a registered member to rate this post.
Loading...



The Gospel According to Mel

I mentioned in my post yesterday that I do not much like Mel Gibson’s “The Passion of the Christ.”  Now that I think about it, I don’t think I know a single scholar of the historical Jesus, or of the New Testament, or – well of any academic topic taught at universities whom I’ve ever spoken with – who liked the movie.   Most of the objections raised to it have involved its portrayals of Jews and its apparent embrace of the kinds of anti-Semitism that is all too easy to overlook, and therefore re-embrace without thinking.
I am completely sympathetic with these objections.  But here I’ll talk about other issues.   I find the movie problematic (also) because Gibson maintained *both* that he stayed faithful to the accounts of the Gospels *and* that he showed events “as they really were.”   Neither is true.
First, as to being faithful to the Gospel accounts.   The one thing that struck every single person who saw the movie and that kept most everyone else away from seeing it was the horrifically gruesome violence done to the body of Jesus, not only at the crucifixion but even more during the episode of his flogging, where he is literally beaten to a pulp until he can’t stand, but then finds strength to arise and more or less tell them to bring it on again some more (he HAS to suffer, so he’s in for the full treatment – KEEP IT COMIN’ BOYS), which they do, blow after blow after blow until he is little more than a throbbing blob of blood.
So, is this being faithful to the Gospels?  Actually…

FOR THE REST OF THIS POST, go to the Members’ Site.  If you don’t belong yet, JOIN, WILL YA????


 
image_pdfimage_print









in
Share
.







When Time Stood Still«
The Gospel according to Mel (For Members)»


18

OCT

2013

6
  
Comments
6  Comments
0  Trackbacks




nevernine  May 16, 2014
Please help, I am totally lost on the members page.
 I am a member. But when I go to finish (say, this article, on the Mel Gibson film)
 and get to the “Go to members site” to finish it, I cannot get there.
 Where do I go to at that point to hook up the rest of the article?
Thank you.
 Je.
Log in to Reply  
Bart Ehrman

Bart Ehrman  May 16, 2014
Maybe you should just look at the “For Members Only” posting instead of the one for everyone?
Log in to Reply  
 

acircharo

acircharo  June 12, 2014
Actually, I think there is a problem with this. I am registered, signed in, and clicked on Member’s Content. When I go back to “Films About Jesus” and return to The Gospel According to Mel, I come to the same place, indicating if I want to finish the article, I need to go to Member’s Site. Each time the same thing occurs.
Log in to Reply  
Bart Ehrman

Bart Ehrman  June 13, 2014
We’ll look into it.
Log in to Reply  


prlaba  July 1, 2014
Same issue for me. Logged in as member but can’t see your ‘for members’ text for this post.
Log in to Reply  


prlaba  July 1, 2014
Seems to be resolved now, with links to both public and ‘for members only’ versions of your post on this topic.
Log in to Reply  
 
 
 

Subscribe to Comments

You must be logged in to post a comment.




Search by Keyword or User Name


  

Bart’s Recent Posts

My Memory Book, Chapter 6 on “Collective Memory”
April 22, 2015

My Memory Book: False Memories and the Life of Jesus
April 20, 2015

BBC Clip on “The Lost Gospels”
April 19, 2015

On Being Controversial
April 18, 2015

“The Same” Traditions in Oral Cultures
April 17, 2015

Differences Between Oral and Written Cultures
April 16, 2015

My Memory Book, Chapter 4 Again: The Death of Jesus
April 15, 2015

What Is A Memory?
April 13, 2015

Ramblings on Charity and Religion
April 11, 2015

Can A Made-Up Story Be A False Memory?
April 10, 2015

My Memory Book, Ch. 4a
April 10, 2015

My Memory Book, ch. 3
April 8, 2015

My Memory Book, chs. 1-2
April 7, 2015

How I’m Writing This Book
April 6, 2015

Sketch of My Memory Book
April 4, 2015

Archives
Select Month April 2015  (17) March 2015  (27) February 2015  (21) January 2015  (22) December 2014  (26) November 2014  (23) October 2014  (23) September 2014  (26) August 2014  (26) July 2014  (25) June 2014  (25) May 2014  (42) April 2014  (42) March 2014  (39) February 2014  (37) January 2014  (45) December 2013  (45) November 2013  (40) October 2013  (45) September 2013  (42) August 2013  (44) July 2013  (48) June 2013  (45) May 2013  (40) April 2013  (43) March 2013  (44) February 2013  (43) January 2013  (52) December 2012  (46) November 2012  (44) October 2012  (55) September 2012  (51) August 2012  (46) July 2012  (54) June 2012  (51) May 2012  (38) April 2012  (18) 

Bart’s Latest Books
How Jesus Became God
Ehrman sketches Jesus’s transformation from a human prophet to the Son of God exalted to divine status at his resurrection…
Learn More
The Bible: A Historical and Literary Introduction
Bart presents his long-awaited survey of the Bible. Comprehensive yet succinct, current in scholarship, rich in pedagogical tools, and easily accessible to students of all backgrounds…
Learn More
 

 



Latest Additions


My Memory Book, Chapter 6 on “Collective Memory”
The sixth chapter of my book Jesus Before the Gospels is tentatively entitled “Collective Memory and Early Recollections of...


My Memory Book: False Memories and the Life of Jesus
As I indicated in my previous two posts, the fifth chapter of the book I’m now writing, Jesus Before The Gospels, deals wit...

One Time Donation to Foundation

Since Jan. 1, 2013, CIA has collected $104,500 for charity. You can help too! Any one-time donation to the Bart Ehrman Foundation helps Bart’s select charities fight hunger and homelessness. The optional form on the right allows reoccurring donations of your preferred limit and choice!



This is not a membership registration. If you wish to become a full member, please click REGISTER from top navigation bar.

Monthy Reoccuring Donations



When Do Donations Recur?
DailyMonthlyYearly 
How Many Times to Recur?
Never End23456789101112 
Enter Your Donation Amount



Login

Username:

Password:


 Remember Me


Register | Lost your Password?
 

 
© 2012-2015 Christianity in Antiquity (CIA): The Bart Ehrman Blog by Innovative Design

Return to Top
                          


http://ehrmanblog.org/gospel-according-mel/










Home
About Bart
Testimonials
Register
Login
Member Content
Support
Great Courses
Contact Bart
Main Website
Mobile Users

RSS

Twitter

Facebook

YouTube

Google+
  

Christianity in Antiquity (CIA): The Bart Ehrman Blog

Membership
why & how to join







Philanthropy
assist the needy

Latest Posts
member & public

Member Forum
discussions

Bart´s Books
reviews & publishers













   


Bart’s Blog
HomeBart’s BlogOn Debating a Fundamentalist 
  
1 vote, average: 5.00 out of 51 vote, average: 5.00 out of 51 vote, average: 5.00 out of 51 vote, average: 5.00 out of 51 vote, average: 5.00 out of 5 (1 votes, average: 5.00 out of 5)
You need to be a registered member to rate this post.
Loading...



On Debating a Fundamentalist

READER COMMENT:
I just came across a post by Kyle Butt regarding your debate with him in 2014:
http://www.apologeticspress.org/APContent.aspx?category=12&article=4844
 He accuses you of “deception” and dishonesty. He says it is not credible that you spent much time writing books and going to debates, if it weren’t for the motive of convincing and persuading people that the Christian God doesn’t exist. He names you as someone who “has done as much or more than any single individual in modern times to destroy the Christian faith of literally thousands of people, young and old alike, across the globe.”

RESPONSE:
Wow.  I didn’t know about Mr. Butt’s post.   It is virtually beyond belief.   If it weren’t so outrageously funny, I would find it completely outrageous.
But look – maybe he doesn’t mean it seriously?  I mean, his rhetoric certainly seems serious.  But to say that I have “done as much or more than any single individual in modern times to destroy the Christian faith of literally thousands of people, young and old alike, across the globe” – really??  You gotta be kidding me!
On what basis does Mr. Butt make this claim?   I don’t know.  He doesn’t say.  But it ascribes to me way, way more power and influence than I have, I assure you.   The person who posted this comment asked me, in a subsequent email, if people ever write or talk to me to tell me they are either upset or happy that I caused them to lose their faith.  And frankly, I can’t think of anyone.  Maybe some have?  I really don’t know.   How does Mr. Butt know?  And how can *I* make someone “lost their faith.”  It’s not mine to give or take away.  People have their own views, based on everything they know and think.  If someone leaves the faith it’s not because someone else “made” them do it.
Very ocassionally (i.e., like once a month or so) I’ll get an email from someone who says that they appreciate my books because I articulate what they themselves have long been thinking but haven’t been able, until now, to put into words.   Sometimes people tell me that they were having serious problems with their faith and they are grateful for my honest dealings with the problems of the Bible or with the problem of suffering.
But to make me out as the Devil incarnate is really too much.  I’d like to know what grounds Mr. Butt has for asserting that I have ruined people’s lives – many thousands of people! of all ages!  across the globe!   Not just their lives, but their *eternal* lives!!  I myself, Bart Ehrman, am the reason so many thousands of people now are going to roast in hell forever!   Wow.   And there I thought I was just writing a book.
The entire post of Mr. Butt is very difficult for me to read.  Read it for yourself.  You (unlike I) might find it entertaining at least.  Two things struck me about it.  The first was Mr. Butt’s arrogant self-importance.  He really, really wants his readers to know that he was in a debate that was listened to by 100,000 people.  And he really, really, really wants everyone to know that even if he didn’t do as well as he would have liked in the debate (OK, he doesn’t concede this part J ), he certainly won and was right all along.   And not only was I, his devilish opponent, wrong, but I won’t admit I was wrong, because – this is a killer, and is the second thing that struck me – I refused to admit that I wanted to “win” the debate.
OK, so let me be as brutally honest as I can.   Mr. Butt didn’t believe me in the debate (why not just call me a liar to my face?!?)  (wait a second… I think he did!), and he won’t believe me now.  But let me say it again as forcefully as I can.  I don’t CARE if people agree with me and join with me in becoming agnostic.   REALLY!!!  I ABSOLUTELY don’t care!!  Mr. Butt does not, will not, or cannot believe me.  But it’s true.   I don’t care if you who are reading this, or anyoneI know, or anyone I don’t know, becomes an agnostic.
The reason Mr. Butt can’t believe me is because as a good fundamentalist, he thinks that ALL that matters is that people agree with HIM.  If people don’t agree with him, they are going to roast in hell forever.   For him, these are not merely issues of life and death, they are matters of eternal life and non-ending torture.   He can’t imagine talking about them without having as the one ultimate goal to save people’s souls and give them eternal life.
And if so if someone wants to talk about the problem of suffering in order to explain why it led to their agnosticism, Mr. Butt cannot believe – CANNOT believe – that the objective would be something other than to convert them to an agnostic point of view.
But that’s not my objective – OK, Mr. Butt, call me a liar once more!   And it never has been myobjective.
Why then do I talk about the matter, and have debates about the matter, and bare my soul publicly about the matter.? It is for a reason that Mr. Butt cannot understand or conceive, even when explained to him.  It is to get people to think.
Mr. Butt cannot understand this because he does not want people to think.  He wants to convince people that he’s right.  He wants to make people agree with him.  He wants to convert people.  He does not want them to reason through a problem, see its ins and outs, consider the pluses and minuses of the various positions, and come to a reasoned conclusion.  He is not interested in thinking and the possibility of various perspectives and views.  He is interested in everybody admitting that he was right all along and then joyfully joining his side.
The idea that someone doesn’t much care which side you take so long as you are more thoughtful about it is completely beyond Mr. Butt’s imagination (such imagination as he has). That’s the difference between a university professor and a fundamentalist Christian apologist.
I will say this – to one *extremely* limited sense there is a single aspect of Mr Butt’s view that I would agree with.  There is ONE form of “thought” that I wish we could get rid of.  It is the arrogant, rigid, and dogmatic kind of fundamentalism that Mr. Butt represents.  When I say that I don’t want to convert anybody to agnosticism, I really do mean it.  But I do indeed want people not to be fundamentalists.
Otherwise, I don’t care if people are Christian (even evangelical Christian), Jewish, Muslim, Hindu, Buddhist, Confucian, agnostic, atheist, pagan, or anything else.   As long as they are thinking and thoughtful (which is another way of saying non-fundamentalist) – that is all fine by me!   For Mr. Butt, that is inconceivable.  Literally.
For my part, I would like to dispel ignorance.  Mr. Butt doesn’t care about ignorance.  He would be perfectly happy for a person to be as ignorant and dumb as dirt, so long as they agree with his doctrines of God, and Christ, and salvation.   I am just the opposite.  If someone is a Christian, I want them to be a knowledgeable and thinking Christian.  Or Jew.  Or Muslim.  Or pagan.  Or agnostic.  Or atheist.   The world would be a happier and better place if we got rid of fundamentalist stupidity and ignorance, and became a more thoughtful and thinking place.  Beyond that, I really don’t care.

 
image_pdfimage_print









in
Share
.







My Debate with Dan Wallace: Is the Original NT Lost?«
Debates For A Price»


21

FEB

2015

81
  
Comments
81  Comments
0  Trackbacks




Stephen  February 21, 2015
Part of the problem – maybe the whole of the problem – is that to the fundamentalist mindset one is either actively supporting their view of religion or actively opposing it. They simply cannot wrap their heads around the idea of disinterested and dispassionate inquiry. And of course attacking your motives is simply a smokescreen to shift the focus away from them having to actually respond to your ideas.
There’s a quote attributed to e. e. cummings I believe –
“f you make people think they’re thinking they’ll love you but if you actually make them think they’ll hate you.”
Log in to Reply  



Judith  February 22, 2015
You are enabling those of us whose family and friends are fundamentalists to stand strong as a different kind of Christian. When we can no longer believe every word in the Bible was inspired by God, then through your books, debates and blog a more realistic basis for our beliefs can be established. With every opportunity I let people know I am blogging with Dr. Bart Ehrman. Some seem horrified once they look you up. Others are interested.
I could not be who I am now without you and your excellent brave work.
Log in to Reply  



Jason  February 22, 2015
I know we’re all thinking it and probably going to make the same joke, but…
This guy is such a butt.
Log in to Reply  

gmatthews

gmatthews  February 22, 2015
I didn’t care for debate in high school so I don’t know the ins and outs of it, but in reading what he wrote I didn’t entirely understand his reasoning. He was talking about how you were trying to appeal to people’s emotions with your arguments, but based on the way he described it I didn’t see it that way at all. What he says about your arguments seemed pretty logical to me. One thing about fundamentalists that irks me is that they don’t use logic when thinking about religion. The way they view the creation of man God must have given us a brain and therefore we have the ability to reason because we need a brain for that. Why would God give us the ability to reason if it allows us to reason that he doesn’t exist? And, if we can reason how can they come up with something as preposterous as his statement that “objective morality exists therefore God exists”? Even before he mentioned it my first thought was that not all cultures have the same moral values and sometimes they are diametrically opposed between cultures, but then he went on to say that you brought that up. Brilliant point….
Log in to Reply  



Jim  February 22, 2015
Well I’d say that you might have contributed to my becoming an agnostic. I asked myself; was I going to listen to an NT scholar, or was I going to listen to just any butt that came along? :)
Log in to Reply  



magpie  February 22, 2015
Unfortunately, there are some people who have convinced themselves so thoroughly of the need to maintain a certain facade that you will never persuade them through reason and fact to change their minds. I believe it is a combination of a mental obsessive compulsive disorder and narcissicism. Truly a mental illness when carried to this extent. “If I am wrong then I am nothing, so I must be right and you must acknowledge that or I will continue repeating my demands until you agree with me.” It is a sad way to live.
Log in to Reply  



prairieian  February 22, 2015
To build on the argument that you have articulated, among the things I find puzzling about the Fundamentalist perspective is their concern with me. Salvation is described as a personal relationship with God, through the one and only way, through Jesus. However, it is “personal”. Therefore, it is between me and God. No one else has a role. I will think things through and come to what conclusions I come to, but the responsibility for my thoughts, and where those thoughts might lead, remains with me, no one else. And, thank you very much, I don’t want anyone’s interest, let alone interference, in my salvation. To allow such is to take away from the personal aspect of salvation or non-salvation (damnation, I guess).
I will strive to keep thinking about these things, but I certainly do not want Fundamentalists praying for me, or expressing concern for my salvation. Salvation is my problem, not theirs.
There is a stunning arrogance with those who have all the answers. It is not attractive and it is anything but compelling.
Unfortunately, the study of religious matters is evidently not received by the non-academic world as being just another “subject”. This reality is much to be regretted and is the author of a disproportionate amount of suffering in the world. I cannot imagine a personal, caring God, should she exist, can be remotely pleased with how her creatures are behaving.
Log in to Reply  



Jim  February 22, 2015
Well spoken. Thank you for your candor.
 I am very appreciative for your helping me appreciate the Bible with a much greater depth of understanding.
 Most noise usually comes from the shallow end of the pool (borrowed fom Bishop Spong).
Log in to Reply  



Lehrerin1  February 22, 2015
A breath of fresh air here in the Bible belt……yes, there is a Bible belt in NW USA…..where Kathy McMorris Rogers is from with her Christian Bible school education……so scary!
Log in to Reply  



doug  February 22, 2015
If Mr. Butt was happy with your views, you’d know you weren’t doing a good job. Please keep up your good work. And if you get to hell before me, please save me a good seat!
Log in to Reply  



toejam  February 22, 2015
It’s a tough call whether or not it’s worth debating fundamentalists. In the creationist-evolutionist “debate”, you see people like Richard Dawkins refusing to debate them on the grounds that it gives them undeserved air-time. I.e. It looks impressive on their CV that they have debated Richard Dawkins! Wow! They must have some clout behind them!! And that’s a fair point from Dawkins. But on the other hand, people like Bill Nye see it as a valuable opportunity to express the power of the evidence & argument that supports evolution to a community who may not be aware just how overwhelming it is and whose only “understanding” of evolution is the misrepresentation that they’ve been taught by their fundamentalist pastors. So given that you do debate fundamentalists occasionally, have you considered the Dawkins position that debating them may in fact be giving them undeserved air time? And why do you side for the latter? (I’m not sure where I would stand if I were in your position)
Log in to Reply  
Bart

Bart  February 23, 2015
It’s a constant debate with my self. Maybe I’ll post on it at some point.
Log in to Reply  


Hon Wai  February 24, 2015
Maybe set a precondition for debate with a fundamentalist that he (interestingly enough, all the well-known names in fundamentalist circles are men) has a sense of humour.
Log in to Reply  



Judith  February 27, 2015
Maybe you do it to keep lighting that one candle wherever and whenever you can…
Log in to Reply  


Judith  February 27, 2015
The 2/27 comment about lighting that one candle is supposed to be after your 2/23 “It’s a constant debate with my self” comment. Somehow it ended up in the wrong place. Sorry.
Log in to Reply  
 
 
 



Robert  February 22, 2015
One question–why do you bother debating with people like that?
Log in to Reply  
Bart

Bart  February 23, 2015
I may post on that sometime.
Log in to Reply  


Judith  February 24, 2015
If you do, Dr. Ehrman, keep in mind there are some fantastically wonderful fundamentalists. My sister and brother (I could never call that beloved brother-in-law anything but a real brother to me) are fundamentalists to the extreme. He is a Gideon. She lives to serve in any and every way possible as does he. He says if you cannot trust that the Bible is the Word of God, what can you trust. She says we cannot understand the mind of God and that’s why there are things in the Bible that cannot be explained. These are extremely well educated people.
Log in to Reply  
 
 

Aleph82

Aleph82  February 22, 2015
“Orthodoxy means not thinking–not needing to think. Orthodoxy is unconsciousness.” – Winston Smith
Quoting from Orwell today (or well, anyone) risks making you sound boring rather than profound, but it was so appropriate I couldn’t resist. There’s a personal irony I found in this post: your books and the others they have led me to have softened my atheism considerably. I’m not a believer, and I doubt I ever will be, but I no longer feel the need to “convert” people or ridicule their faith. That behaviour now seems unnecessary and tacky.
Today I rarely mention my atheism save for posts like this or when I’m accused of being a Christian apologist by mythicists. A happy by-product of this newly found timidity is an exponential expansion of my dating pool. Highly recommended.
Log in to Reply  
Bart

Bart  February 23, 2015
Absolutely *great* book!!
Log in to Reply  
 

Rosekeister

Rosekeister  February 22, 2015
“Bart D. Ehrman, James A. Gray Distinguished Professor at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Destroyer of the Christian Faith and the Devil Incarnate.”
If this continues, your name will be similar to long royal titles like the Queen of England and you will be able to name any fee for speaking. It has also just struck me that you could probably raise money selling t-shirts with your picture on the front and the above title on the back. Both believers and nonbelievers would buy them although for different reasons. There are websites where you can design t-shirts, coffee mugs and any number of items for sale and then link the the blog to them.
Log in to Reply  



Hank_Z  February 22, 2015
Terrific response, Bart!
Any chance you’d give me permission to post the question and
 your response on Facebook? Or make it available to “share”?
Log in to Reply  
Bart

Bart  February 23, 2015
Sure, go ahead, as long as you credit the original source.
Log in to Reply  
 



Jeff  February 22, 2015
Very, very funny. And by the way Bart, since you have such powers, according to Butt, how about using it on those #15 ranked Tarheels?
Log in to Reply  
Bart

Bart  February 23, 2015
don’t I wish…
Log in to Reply  
 



Jim-Prup-Benton  February 22, 2015
Well put. I might be tempted to ask if there aren’t certain concepts in certain religions that make the sort of attitude and thought you look for difficult to nearly impossible. For example, that “Doubt is, in itself, sinful” — too often seen as a corollary of ‘Salvation by faith alone.’ That might be for another time.
But there is one attitude that is even worse than the fundamentalist one, and that is the attitude that ‘anyone who disagrees is part of the conspiracy’ — for religious people with the frequent implication of a ‘Satanic conspiracy.’ That’s the one that makes any communication impossible as long as it remains.
I am, instead of following through on this now, going to take advantage of a general offer you made and drop a totally off-topic question into the thread to reach you and hopefully to get an answer. But I realized earlier that I had heard of the “Church in Jerusalem” and the “Church in Rome” and of Paul’s many churches, but had never heard of a “Church in Galilee.” That’s where the ‘witnesses’ were, the ones who actually heard Jesus preach, who had seen what ever tiny kernel of truth was blown into the ‘wonder stories’ and who had followed his teaching without literally following him to Jerusalem. You’d think it natural that this might even be the numerically largest church for the first decade or two. After all, Jesus was only in Jerusalem for a few days, of preaching, at a time of celebrations and rituals and, almost certainly confusion. (And wouldn’t it be likely that many preachers would head to Jerusalem for the Passover — and compete with Jesus?)
Wouldn’t at least one apostle — all of whom were Galileans — have returned home and attempted to set up a church where Jesus actually walked? Yet I know of no mention of such a Church — admittedly what I know is far from complete. Is there any mention or other textual or architectural evidence showing if such a church actually existed — and if not, has anyone ever asked why.it made so little impression.
Log in to Reply  


Wilusa  February 24, 2015
I hope Bart will reply to this! Seems like a great question, that I’ve never thought of.
Log in to Reply  
Bart

Bart  February 25, 2015
sorry — what’s the question?
Log in to Reply  


Jim-Prup-Benton  February 25, 2015
I DO tend to be long-winded and lose people, sorry. The question is why we never hear of, and what we know of a Church in Galilee. Again, it seems obvious there would be one, but is there any record of one?
Log in to Reply  
Bart

Bart  February 28, 2015
From the NT period? No, not really.
 
 



Wilusa  February 25, 2015
The one Jim-Prup-Benton asked, about why we’ve never heard of a Church in Galilee.
Log in to Reply  
 
 
 



Seeking1  February 22, 2015
Amen! Mr. Butt…very appropriately named.
Log in to Reply  



sashko123  February 22, 2015
I just listened to this debate on YouTube. To Butt, the human sense of injustice is stronger evidence for the existence of God (i.e. Yahweh) than all of the physical evidence consistent with his non-existence;. I’ve come to think that if God does not intervene, he is at least irrelevant if not imaginary. What sense is there in debating fundamentalists whose ironclad proof of God’s existence is premised upon a nonfalsifiable assertion — objective moral values exist! Really?? Wow.
Log in to Reply  

Gary

Gary  February 22, 2015
I just finished watching the entire three hour debate. It made me think if I went to heaven and spend eternity listening to him….well that sounds like hell to me!
Log in to Reply  



MikeyS  February 22, 2015
There is a view that some Christians despise the thought that God would forgive and accept atheists into heaven. They cannot accept that no matter what other faith people have or how good they have lived or given time and money to good causes and charities for the hungry and disavantaged of the world, as they didn’t accept Jesus as their saviour, then that’s it. Hell for you my lad/lass!
In fact its been said that Christians would love to actually see all these people in hell.
IF they thought even a little bit more about what they believe. They would surely come to a different conclusion and indeed IF they believe that God is good, loving and just. Even more so. In the OT book of Jonah, he was really disappointed that God would not punish the people of the pagan city of Ninevah because he thought as non believers, they should be. It really is laughable that fundamental Christians want to convert Jewish people who were there first.
Log in to Reply  



Joseph  February 22, 2015
Your words (in books, debates, and on this blog) make people think.
Thinking is not welcome in 2015 in the US of A (and perhaps elsewhere). This is demonstrably the case not only in religious matters, but in a wide range of important and unimportant elements. Consider:
— Unemployment rate said to be under 6%, but the government has placed tens of millions in a “we don’t want to count them” category. The real employment rate might be 15% or higher (who can know?) BUT: No one cares.
— widespread lying by the US government to get the country into the 2003 Iraq War. There were no WMDs. Saddam had nothing to do with 9/11. Yet polls show a significant (20%-plus) group STILL thinks Saddam had something to do with 9/11. And, more importantly, NO ONE WAS PROSECUTED……the Democrats had 60 votes in the Senate in 2009, and yet did not convene a single committee to review how we were led into a war. No one was called to account for lying to us to get us to enter what is now a multi-decade war
— no one has gone to jail for the economic follies of 2007-2009. This despite the fact that, clearly, fortunes were made (on the backs of the little people). WORSE: There is no protest over this.
— the weakened positions of many state governments has them looking into rolling back pension $$$ promised to retirees (this has already happened). These governments made promises, signed contracts, and now are walking about from them. Do you hear anything about this on the Internet or on TV news? Forget the pensioners who are so ill-treated: If governments establish the precedent that they can walk away from inconvenient promises whenever they like . . . where does this end?
— economic recovery is broadcast by the President, and Republicans seek to take credit for it, and the stock market is “high.” Yet the vast majority of people live on roughly the same income they made 30 years ago. With higher costs.
— have you seen what’s on TV? You might not watch it, but tens of millions do.Latest innovation worth noting (I’ve seen it in advertisements): Sex Box (that’s the name of a new TV show). There are TV shows about midgets and fat people (my 600-pound life). It’s a 24-hour circus, brought right into your living room! All you have to do to avoid it is turn the damn thing off . . . if folks did that, this stuff would go away. They don’t. Why not?
— McDonald’s serves 70 million people daily. Think about that for a moment. These are personal choices made — if I may — without thinking. It’s almost a reflex.
— More attention is paid to the hind quarters of someone named Kardashian on a daily basis — by tens of millions — then is given YEARLY by the same people to the idea that we could build a better world for our children by looking into alternatives like electric cars, solar power, etc.
Fundamentalists will NOT be helped by people thinking. You are asking some people to think. The result is not a good thing for fundamentalists.
To give the person opposing you his due: If he really believes what he says — that those of us who do NOT believe as he does will go directly to Hell — then he definitely must call you the Anti-Christ. You are, in that view, leading people down the path to abomination and perpetual torture.
I believe you already KNOW all of this — someplace inside your brain — and that you were caught short by Butt because you live in a bubble (a college atmosphere). Take a drive at 630am to the 7-11 and watch (and listen to) the people who buy breakfast there (each morning). Go to a McDonald’s at 5pm and look around. Check out the attendance at a movie that makes a US sniper out to be some kind of hero.
The real world (USofA, anyway) consists of people who may not be ignorant — but who definitely want to go along through their lives in a state of uniformed bliss. The presence of tens of millions in such a trance is advantageous to people like Dick Cheney (evil-doer), Jamie Dimon (banker) — and Mr. Butt.
Log in to Reply  



walid  February 22, 2015
professor Ehrman
Even though I might not agree with you all the way …
I say
 you are a CREDIT to your family
 you are a CREDIT to knowledge and scholarship
 you are a CREDIT to the USA
 you are a CREDIT to this world
 you are a CREDIT to the human race.
those who don’t appreciate your effforts only do that due to problems that are not your fault.
Log in to Reply  
Bart

Bart  February 23, 2015
Thank you!
Log in to Reply  
 

kooter

kooter  February 22, 2015
You said: “The world would be a happier and better place if we got rid of fundamentalist stupidity and ignorance, and became a more thoughtful and thinking place.”
I live in Kansas, home state of that kind of ignorance and stupidity. This state became well known for the attempt made by the state school board to redefine the meaning of *science* to include visions of Adam riding around Eden on a dinosaur in public school curriculums. And our current Kansas Governor recently rescinded the preceding governor’s executive order which had prohibited employment discrimination against LGBT persons in the state’s executive branch.
(If I close my eyes and squint into the far, dim, past, I can almost envision watching our Governor, in his formative childhood years, going out of his way to run across a busy street just for the pleasure of kicking a stray dog limping along on the other side.)
And so I personally thank you for your visit to Kansas to speak, (at the invitation of a Wichita church!), on your “How Jesus Became God” book. Observing as an outsider to the congregation, I hope that many in the audience had a chance to experience for themselves that even pew seats can furnish the opportunity for “a more thoughtful and thinking place”.
Log in to Reply  



Alan  February 22, 2015
Dr. Ehrman,
 Contrary to what Mr. Butt says, you have helped at least one person with his faith. Granted, it’s not what he (or my own pastor) would agree with, but, to use use a couple of quotes mistakenly attributed to Thomas Jefferson, “I am of a sect by myself, as far as I know”, and “Say nothing of my religion. It is known to my god and myself alone.” You have helped me develop from an agnosticism to a ‘gnosticism’ of sorts; I believe in God, and I believe that God does not have a religion. Religion was the creation of man as a way to control his fellow man.
 Your writing has helped me to realize that Jesus was a real person and teacher, but that he is the son of God in the same way that we are all sons of God.
 In short, Thank You!
Log in to Reply  


Jim  February 24, 2015
In response to “quotes mistakenly attributed to Thomas Jefferson,” our Sunday School class recently discussed deism as espoused by Jefferson (Jesus as a moral teacher, but not God, no virgin birth, no resurrection, etc.).
 Wikipedia (which I have found as fairly reliable, though not perfect of course), article on the Jefferson Bible includes the following quote:
 Jefferson’s claim to be a Christian was made in response to those who accused him of being otherwise, due to his unorthodox view of the Bible and conception of Christ. Recognizing his rather unique views, Jefferson stated in a letter (1819) to Ezra Stiles Ely, “You say you are a Calvinist. I am not. I am of a sect by myself, as far as I know.”[33]
 Letter from Thomas Jefferson to Ezra Stiles Ely, June 25, 1819, Encyclopedia Virginia.
 This appears to be rather reliable source for this Jefferson quote, or am I deceived?
Log in to Reply  
Bart

Bart  February 25, 2015
I don’t know. Very interesting!
Log in to Reply  
 
 



RonaldTaska  February 22, 2015
Wow!
1. Look I have read all of your trade books, read all of your blogs, listened to all of your youtube videos, completed all of your great courses and had some private email correspondence with you and what struck me is that Mr. Butt keeps describing a Dr.Ehrman who is nothing like the Dr. Ehrman I have come to know and respect. Who in the world is he describing?
 2. Contrary to what Mr. Butt says, you clearly describe the punishment, redemptive, and apocalyptic Biblical explanations for suffering in “God’s Problem.”
3. That I have encountered many who feel and argue like Mr. Butt is the main reason I no longer attend church and now check the “none” column in the religion questionnaires. It has just been too frustrating! Too much dogmatic certainty! Too judgmental! Too little compassion. Too little thinking. Too little reading of the entire Bible.
 I just couldn’t swallow it anymore. They drove me off….
Log in to Reply  



Philbert  February 22, 2015
Thank you for posting your thoughts. I saw the debate- great debate- and it amazes me how fundamentalists can claim cosmic truth for their beliefs and twist the evidence we have. It’s impossible to talk to these kind of people. I have to deal with this kind in my own family. They accuse me of: Hating God, loving sin, having no moral compass, having no moral framework on which to form my beliefs, being a philosopher, misunderstanding the bible, taking the bible out of context and “Not getting it”- and other religious texts not in the bible are anti-christ or the devil. They just can’t see how their “evidence” is not evidence to me and they will not budge an inch. Kinda like talking to a child except they need a spanking- lol…
Log in to Reply  



RoelNdeLeeuwBec  February 22, 2015
Dear Bart,
I lost my faith in the infallibility of the Holy Scriptures because of the arguments I found against it, combined with a new view on how to process religious experience. One of these arguments concerned the inspiration theory and the lower critique. For your contribution to this later process, I am extremely grateful, but it was my decision and my call; not yours, nor was it your responsibility.
Those who take you for a scientist, will clearly see, that you have a passion for Christianity, as one of the pillars of Western Culture and ethics. As you are not responsible for the beliefs people had in the past, neither are you for their current beliefs. You try to do your job right, and that is a good thing. All we can do as reasonable persons, is to find warrant for our basic beliefs about things.
In science we try to focus upon such beliefs for which we can find evidence. This does not render scientific beliefs more true, as science itself is based on uncertainty, but rather focuses on such beliefs that are empirically accessible in the sense that they make predictions that can be tested.
Not all true things, occurrences, statements or beliefs can be reproduced or generalized, as beside the structural side, there also is the individual component, like e.g. some value your work more as others. But not our appreciation of this or that theory or belief is what counts, but the extent to which it helps us to see things more clearly, so we are more knowledgeable and less ignorant.
Perhaps, dear Bart, you may not be right with everything – and you never claimed such a thing – but your work and arguments are plausible. Some may not like that, but then it is their job to prove you wrong. Not with an internet post, but with a scholarly valid argument. Anything else is, for as far as I see it, ordinary propaganda.
Roel N. de Leeuw B.ec
Log in to Reply  
cheriq

cheriq  February 26, 2015
I’d lost my faith long before I had heard of Dr. Ehrman. I suppose there was a time I thought I was a “born again” Christian – back when I was taken to church constantly, and surrounded by family and peers who were “born agains”. However; it was in my own study of the NT – not just READING, but studying in a parallel fashion that I became aware of the inconsistencies between the gospels (particularly the nativity in Matthew and Luke), and realized that Paul taught a different doctrine than Jesus did. Fortunately, I didn’t need to learn Hebrew and Greek to find the truth about the Bible. I couldn’t have gone as far as Dr. Ehrman with education. When I found I did not believe in the Nicene creed is when I dropped the Christian label, and it has been freedom! I’m not an agnostic; but, am a Deist – as Thomas Jefferson, Thomas Paine and other marvelous intellectuals and leaders….probably Einstein, as well!
Log in to Reply  
 



sashko123  February 22, 2015
How is it that fundamentalists are suddenly protectors of logic over appeals to emotion anyway? Another stroll through Bizarro World.
Log in to Reply  
Bart

Bart  February 23, 2015
I know, it’s strange. They really are children of the Enlightenment. Go figure.
Log in to Reply  
 



alienvoodoo  February 23, 2015
Dr, Bart,
 I found the debate on Youtube http://youtu.be/8FRtKANMXCQ…after watching the entire debate and subjecting my self to this arrogant, incoherent, and sadly ignorant apologist, I now know the meaning of suffering and have a whole new appreciation and admiration for you. I found myself cringing several times, and know that i could not have handled this as well as you did. Hats off to you!
Log in to Reply  



mjordan20149  February 23, 2015
Let me just say that you are a better writer than Mr. Butt and leave it at that. I wasn’t impressed by his blog post as literature. Mark Twain might have called it “literary chloroform.”
Log in to Reply  



Kevin  February 23, 2015
Great post. I appreciate that you are so forthcoming.
 If I may ask:
 Are you angry that fundamentals deceived you as a youth and want to get back at them? Do you want to rescue others from your experience of being misled? Both?
Log in to Reply  
Bart

Bart  February 23, 2015
I mainly want people not to be misled by comfortable and plausbile-sounding stupidity.
Log in to Reply  


spiker  February 24, 2015
New Bumper sticker? Tshirt?
Log in to Reply  
 
 



Gary  February 23, 2015
I very much appreciate you discussing this issue, Dr. E., but I don’t think you realize the earth shattering effect that you and your books are having upon fundamentalist Christianity.
One year ago, this month, I was a devout, fundamentalist Christian scouring the internet for potential converts to MY version of fundamentalist Christianity (orthodox Lutheranism). I came across the blog of an ex-fundamentalist Baptist pastor (Bruce Gerencser) and read his story of deconversion. I decided that this blaspheming atheist needed to be set straight, so I started sharing the “Truth” with him. It was downhill (for me) from there.
After briefly entertaining my arrogance, Gerencser referred me to three of your books and said, “I will not debate you any further until you read Ehrman’s books.” So I read them. The first book I read was “Misquoting Jesus”. As a fundamentalist, I had grown up believing that the existing manuscripts of the Bible, in the original languages, contained no errors. I was blown away to learn of all the scribe alterations. The more I read your books the more I began to question the inerrancy of the Bible, the foundation of my belief system. I went to several pastors of my denomination for help. They mostly told me to go read apologists’ books for the answers and that all Biblical “discrepancies” have long ago been harmonized. There are no errors. There are no discrepancies. So I read NT Wright’s 800 page work “The Resurrection of the Son of God”. I didn’t find his principle “evidence” for the Resurrection convincing: that “no Jew would have believed that a man had been resurrected unless he really HAD been resurrected”. The fact is, the overwhelming majority of Jews did NOT believe the story, and have not believed the story for 2,000 years. The fact that a small group of Jesus’ uneducated, Galilean peasant disciples did believe it should not be a surprise.
After four months of gut-wrenching agony, grasping at every straw I could to keep my cherished Christian faith, I abandoned my belief in Jesus as my Lord and Savior. I no longer believed that the Bible was inerrant or inspired. I no longer believed that Jesus had been raised from the dead or that he was God. I was an agnostic.
I still have a lot of discussions with fundamentalist Christians (I still love to debate the Bible…just from the other side). I can tell you for sure, Dr. Ehrman, you are Enemy Number One among fundamentalist and evangelical Christians. I agree with them: many, many people are deconverting from fundamentalist Christianity because of you and your books. But I see it as a GOOD thing. Fundamentalism, in any form, and in any religion, is deadly. Millions upon millions of people have died at the hands of pious Christians who believed that they were doing the will of God.
I have no issue with liberal Christianity or any religion that is non-exclusivist. But any belief system that teaches that “we” are right and everyone else is not only wrong, but evil…must be opposed. You, Dr. Ehrman, may not intentionally be converting people to agnosticism, but you are nontheless. And I thank you for it! I, myself, DO try to convert others, not to agnosticism or atheism, but to non-fundamentalism, and, to the abandonment of supernatural superstitions, the root cause of all religious fundamentalism. Fundamentalist Christianity is an evil superstition that needs to be yanked out by the roots.
Log in to Reply  
Bart

Bart  February 23, 2015
Thanks for your comments. Good luck as you keep forging ahead.
Log in to Reply  

cheriq

cheriq  February 26, 2015
Exactly, Gary. What I can appreciate in Dr. Ehrman’s writing is his simplicity and straight-forwardness. His audience is not limited to the erudite types. That may be what makes him seen as so “dangerous” — he reaches the uneducated who’ve been easily brain-washed. And I DO mean, literally, brain-washed. Ever sit through the music played during an invitational (altar call)? I’d say it affects the beta waves (anxious people tend to produce an overabundance of high beta waves).
Log in to Reply  
 

Ryan Pence

Ryan Pence  February 23, 2015
As a thinking person, it was plain for me to see the depth of your compassion and determination to have an impact for good in the world, especially when it comes to ignoring our instinct to behave in the egocentric ways so many of us do. I can AND could, see from your body language and facial expressions alone, your committment to doing everything you can do, to help end avoidable suffering in the world. Bravo Dr. Ehrman! If you want to thank someone for everything that you’ve been blessed, thank YOURSELF! You make me want to be a better person, a more giving person. I consider myself to live a life in poverty, but after hearing you speak of the avoidable, very fixable suffering in the world, I feel truly thankful myself, for a life at America’s poverty rate would be the life of a king in other parts of the world. Bravo Dr. Ehrman, BRAVO!!
Log in to Reply  



RonaldTaska  February 23, 2015
1. I think your main point has always been, not the conversion of others to your viewpoint, but that Christianity is important enough that it merits the critical examination of crucial questions.
 2. I have spent considerable time on the “Apologetics Press” website where Mr. Butt writes. They clearly have an answer to every “apparent” Biblical contradiction and every “apparent” Biblical historical discrepancy. It must be really nice to have an answer to everything. My first question to them is if the Bible is inspired, why in the world does it require so much apologetics from expert apologists?
 3. The ten principles of truth outlined on the website include the statements that the entire universe was created in six approximately 24-hour days, the books of the Bible are inerrant, and those enjoying salvation are members of the one true undenominational church, namely the Churches of Christ.
 4. I was a member of the Churches of Christ, of which Mr. Butt is a member, for over 50 years and found it to be a very difficult experience because of its dogmatic certainty and exclusivity.
 5. I suggest that you just let Mr. Butt bask in the glory of knowing it all and having the “truth” and let it go and move on with your scholarly work. There is just too much nastiness expressed in his viewpoint.
Log in to Reply  



dragonfly  February 23, 2015
I haven’t read the article but from your post I think I get the idea. I agree with all you say in your post, although my attitude towards fundamentalists has softened somewhat. Kyle’s attacks are clearly not helpful to anyone, but his approach is not that dissimilar to someone like Richard Dawkins, who believes God doesn’t exist and therefore everyone should become atheists. I have noticed the occasional anti-religion sentiment from members of this blog too. I would really like to recommend to anyone to read “Why God won’t go away” by Dr Andrew Newberg. He’s a neuroscientist who has been studying religion and the brain. The book talks about the science behind the nature of belief and why we believe things. Bart, if you haven’t read it I think it would be helpful with your next book about the time before the gospels. In short, belief has little to do with what’s real and true. The human brain cares little for what’s real and true, only for what is useful. I understand why some people need fundamentalism.
Log in to Reply  



mary  February 23, 2015
I tried to read the complete article by Mr. Butt. I could not. First, I thought it was a joke, he must have had a terrible time as a child due to his name.
 I am not sure the best way to go about this so I decided to add as short a paragraph as I can, from my own perspective.
I had been trying to read and understand the Bible for a few years now. I knew since before I retired that I needed to read what was in the bible for myself. I had questions about what I was being told it said. Yet I could not get a handle on reading the book (books) myself to come to a place of understanding, without listening to interpretations from others that were not clear, contradictory and sometimes made no sense to. This effort led me to numerous writings and explanations from many people present and past. It was not until I purchased your Teaching Company Course, covering the New Testament that I had found a teacher who could explain the bible as a book in a way I could understand and most importantly without an agenda. You give honest, open and reasoned bases for what is and was believed, by whom and thoroughly explained. Now it would be great if your critics could respect people for taking responsibility for what they believe and how they live based on their own decision, independent of others interpretation.
It seems as though your critics want people to have complete faith, trust and confidence in THEM not the god of their teaching. What I believe is now an informed and adult choice. Thank you so much for giving me the knowledge necessary to continue on a learning journey I hope will last my lifetime. You are a great teacher. Please do not let this foolish criticism take up too much energy and time from doing what is important very interesting.
Log in to Reply  

Fearguth

Fearguth  February 23, 2015
When he says that Bart Ehrman “has done as much or more than any single individual in modern times to destroy the Christian faith of literally thousands of people, young and old alike, across the globe,” Kyle Butt is, in an allegorical way, describing the threat, as he perceives it, your speaking/writing poses to HIS faith. As Ernest Becker says (in ‘Escape from Evil’), “If your adversary wins the argument about truth, you die. Your immortality system has been shown to be fallible, your life becomes fallible.”
Log in to Reply  
cheriq

cheriq  February 26, 2015
Very insightful, Fearguth!
Log in to Reply  
 



spiker  February 23, 2015
Time and time again, a video will appear after you’ve debated someone, William Lane Craig etc
 explaining why you were wrong in the debate. The implication seems to be they thought you won and
 now need to explain why you didn’t when you’re not around to respond. Though, there’s also
 the status bump: I debated Bart Ehrman and survived or something to that effect.
 Then there are folks like Mr. Butt – a candidate for the Ehrman project?- who can’t even acknowledge that your premise has any merit.
Thomas Huxley, IMHO, defined Agnosticism precisely with the Kyle Butts of the world in mind:
“[B]etween Agnosticism and Ecclesiasticism, or, as our neighbours across the Channel call it, Clericalism, there can be neither peace nor truce. The Cleric asserts that it is morally wrong not to believe certain propositions, whatever the results of a strict scientific investigation of the evidence of these propositions. He tells us “that religious error is, in itself, of an immoral nature.”He declares that he has prejudged certain conclusions, and looks upon those who show cause for arrest of judgment as emissaries of Satan. It necessarily follows that, for him, the attainment of faith, not the ascertainment of truth, is the highest aim of mental life.”
Here we get a bit more clarity on (Fifty Shades of Agnosticism?) what Huxley had in mind when he coined the term Agnosticism. On the one hand, He is defining it by HOW one knows rather than what one knows and that he seems to use the word gnostic as a synonym for unjustified certainty
 I don’t want to cast aspersions on all fundamentalists, per se, and Huxley correctly understood
 the distinction
“With scientific Theology, Agnosticism has no quarrel. On the contrary, the Agnostic, knowing too well the influence of prejudice and idiosyncrasy, even on those who desire most earnestly to be impartial, can wish for nothing more urgently than that the scientific theologian should not only be at perfect liberty to thresh out the matter in his own fashion; but that he should, if he can, find flaws in the Agnostic position; and, even if demonstration is not to be had, that he should put, in their full force, the grounds of the conclusions he thinks probable. The scientific theologian admits the Agnostic principle, however widely his results may differ from those reached by the majority of Agnostics.”
Log in to Reply  

cadmium

cadmium  February 23, 2015
As a former bible thumping, Jesus movement, radical fundamentalist, it bothered me that, at one point in my life, I could not tell the basic difference between me and those whom I opposed. Militant, unyielding, incredibly narrow minded, and a 2 dimensional understanding of what my belief system included; that was a good description of it. Not that I thought that I was that way, but that I would have leaned more heavily toward Mr. Butt POV than anything else. Unfortunately, I thought I was deep. I had read all the right books, gone to the good schools, and bolstered my knowledge with copious amount of instruction.
But was I any different that “my enemy”? No, not really…. and that was deeply troubling. Yeshua (Jesus, Christ, Son of God, whatever you want to call him) called his followers to be different and live by a different set of rules.
After 10 years of questioning everything i believed, I came across “Did Jesus Exsist?”. Life Changing. seriously.
I then, over the course of the next year, devoured just about every thing else you have written (I am currently stuck in the middle of “Forgery and Counterforgery”) and found that I now have a deeper and more rich understanding of the underpinnings and foundations of Christianity. Your work on the textual critique of the NT and its implications was foundation to my understanding of the what and why of my faith. It has made it stronger.
One of the best “gospel messages” I have ever heard/read was in “Peter, Paul, and Mary Magdalene” in the chapter on Paul. This reality of life that we call “Paul” changed my religious life. It explained in real terms with logic and history the basis for my understanding the Christian faith.
Dr. Ehrman, I am still a crackpot and radical, but at least I am learning to ask the real questions before I spout off and to be more thoughtful of my fellow man and understanding of our shared experience.
Thanks for your hard work.
Log in to Reply  



daviskent  February 24, 2015
Debating a fundamentalist strikes me to be not much different than arguing with a climate change denier or lately the anti-vaccine crowd. It really doesn’t matter what, how much, or overwhelmingly credible the evidence against their position, all that we’re really doing is providing material which they can and will manipulate, twist and then reuse for their own purposes to others of their ilk in order to keep the herd mentality in line. It strikes me more and more as simply pointless and perhaps it would be better (and easier) to provide the truth in the broadest possible ways, and hope for best.
Log in to Reply  



Mark  February 24, 2015
I hear Mr. Butt (appropriate name) has written to Santa Claus to petition him not to bring your presents next year, naughty boy.
Log in to Reply  



Hon Wai  February 24, 2015
I just noticed another striking claim from Butt’s post:
“After pouring over Dr. Ehrman’s materials, meeting him in a head-to-head debate, and praying for him frequently, I pity him most because HE NOW LIVES A LIFE WITHOUT HOPE and without God in this world.” (my capitalisation)
 He obviously hasn’t read enough of Dr. Ehrman’s materials – lots of people would envy the wonderful life Dr. Ehrman has and enjoys – stimulating job he loves, financial resources from academic job in a leading state university and popular writings, bestselling author, philanthrophy activities to do his little bit to give hope to less fortunate people, his wonderful family and much else. Fundamentalists love to tell people they are praying for them, as if this is such an altruistic loving act, when simultaneously they have no hesitation slandering the same people they so lovingly prayed for, accusing them of deception, dishonesty and the like.
Log in to Reply  
Bart

Bart  February 25, 2015
Yeah, it’s pretty pitiable if someone pities *me*!!
Log in to Reply  
 



Sharon  February 24, 2015
Prior to discovering you existed (!) I was confused and harsh on myself for not believing everything I was taught. My teachings from family and church just didn’t make sense to me, but Heaven Forbid I ever express this! My great luck was encountering you on a cruise ship when for three days you spoke and taught. I was additionally privileged to have a private conversation with you when you were diligently trying to read/study by the ship’s pool, and you graciously allow me to asked you a few questions, beginning with a belief or non belief position on reincarnation. It was then you shared with me that you did not have a belief in God, and you were extremely gracious in explaining your reasoning when I asked why. As I look at all your books lining my bookshelf, (I think I have them all!) I will be forever grateful for the education you have provided me, bringing a complete sense of comfort in my understanding and current beliefs. I’m not the prolific writer of the authors of many of your posts, who are obviously much more educated in these subjects, but I continue to learn and appreciated you more than words can say.
Log in to Reply  



reedm60  February 25, 2015
Dr Ehrman,
At the end of the debate, one of the announcers claimed that we had 99.5% of the original text of the New Testament. You told him that number cannot be verified without the originals. I have also seen this number thrown around beside Dr Metzger’s name on Matt Slick’s website, http://www.carm.org. Did Dr Metzger really believe we had that just of the original? Or is this just fundamentalist wishful thinking?
Log in to Reply  


reedm60  February 25, 2015
I meant, Did Dr Metzger really believe we had that much of the original?
Log in to Reply  
Bart

Bart  February 28, 2015
Yup.
Log in to Reply  
 

Bart

Bart  February 28, 2015
Yes, I think Metzger did believe that we are sure about the vast majority of the cases where there is variation. But I should stress, this was a *belief*.
Log in to Reply  


reedm60  March 2, 2015
I think the 99.5% number is a typical example of fundamentalists being misleading because it fails to factor in all of the extra text that has been added down through the centuries. An unknowing person sees that 99.5% number and thinks, ‘Wow! The King James Version of the Bible is 99.5% identical to what the original authors wrote! It’s a miracle!’
Anyway, in your debate with Dan Wallace some time ago, you said that in 2005 scholars got together to produce what was supposedly the ‘original’ Greek text of the New Testament. Then, in 2010, another group of scholars got together to do the same thing. You then said that these two works differ in almost 6000 places. That is a lot more than 0.5%!
Log in to Reply  
Bart

Bart  March 3, 2015
Well, if 99 words are correct, and only one isn’t, but that word happens to be the word “not” — it would be a big deal!
Log in to Reply  
 
 
 



Joshua  February 26, 2015
Excellent rejoinder.
Log in to Reply  



fred  February 27, 2015
Does this experience make you any more, or less inclined to debate fundamentalists? The bad news is the public abuse you receive. The good news is that you might actually light a fire under a few fundamentalists (and of course, there’s the money you make for your charity).
Log in to Reply  
Bart

Bart  February 28, 2015
Yes, I keep thinking about the positive. If that were not attainable, my opponents would not be so vociferous and mean-spirited in attacking me!
Log in to Reply  
 



johnfelon  March 1, 2015
Mr. Butt, in addition to having a very appropriate name, doesn’t understand how rational people lose their faith. It doesn’t happen by reading a book. It doesn’t happen by reading ten books. It happens by reading hundreds of books and experiencing life over a period of decades.
I was 8 years-old when I first sought evidence to support the stories I heard during mass each Sunday.
I was 13 when I decided I no longer believed that Jesus was divine, but I still tried to follow his teachings about love and peace.
In my 20s, I regarded myself as agnostic, but did not consider myself an atheist until two years ago. I am now 43.
Looking back, what I find interesting are the endless rationalizations I gave to God and his agents. Nearly two decades passed between my first doubts and the point where I finally recognized and embraced my lack of faith. I did not casually cast off my belief. I couldn’t, because it was too precious to me. It was my identity. Instead, I gave it every possible chance and begrudgingly caved to rational thought. That’s what Mr. Butt and others like him can’t seem to understand.
So Dr. Ehrman…let’s strike a deal. You keep seeking the truth, and I’ll keep reading your books. Fair?
Log in to Reply  
Bart

Bart  March 3, 2015
Sounds good to me.
Log in to Reply  
 



gavm  March 5, 2015
Bart i think your more influential than you think.
 i for one didnt believe the jesus existed until i listened to you. when i first learnt that the new test was written so long after the fact in a foreign country in a foreign lang, it just made more sense to me the he was prob made up like Hercules or Adam and Eve. it was when i read some of yr books and listen on the great courses that i learnt the historical method and that it all makes more sense if he prob did live. point being dont underestimate yourself.
when he says youve hurt christanity i assume he means the evangelic sort, if which you have put a lot of hole in it quite famously (to the point that your a hero to many muslims!). i can see why they would fear you
PS. i understand your frustration debating mythicists. damm painful
Log in to Reply  

Subscribe to Comments

You must be logged in to post a comment.




Search by Keyword or User Name


  

Bart’s Recent Posts

My Memory Book, Chapter 6 on “Collective Memory”
April 22, 2015

My Memory Book: False Memories and the Life of Jesus
April 20, 2015

BBC Clip on “The Lost Gospels”
April 19, 2015

On Being Controversial
April 18, 2015

“The Same” Traditions in Oral Cultures
April 17, 2015

Differences Between Oral and Written Cultures
April 16, 2015

My Memory Book, Chapter 4 Again: The Death of Jesus
April 15, 2015

What Is A Memory?
April 13, 2015

Ramblings on Charity and Religion
April 11, 2015

Can A Made-Up Story Be A False Memory?
April 10, 2015

My Memory Book, Ch. 4a
April 10, 2015

My Memory Book, ch. 3
April 8, 2015

My Memory Book, chs. 1-2
April 7, 2015

How I’m Writing This Book
April 6, 2015

Sketch of My Memory Book
April 4, 2015

Archives
Select Month April 2015  (17) March 2015  (27) February 2015  (21) January 2015  (22) December 2014  (26) November 2014  (23) October 2014  (23) September 2014  (26) August 2014  (26) July 2014  (25) June 2014  (25) May 2014  (42) April 2014  (42) March 2014  (39) February 2014  (37) January 2014  (45) December 2013  (45) November 2013  (40) October 2013  (45) September 2013  (42) August 2013  (44) July 2013  (48) June 2013  (45) May 2013  (40) April 2013  (43) March 2013  (44) February 2013  (43) January 2013  (52) December 2012  (46) November 2012  (44) October 2012  (55) September 2012  (51) August 2012  (46) July 2012  (54) June 2012  (51) May 2012  (38) April 2012  (18) 

Bart’s Latest Books
How Jesus Became God
Ehrman sketches Jesus’s transformation from a human prophet to the Son of God exalted to divine status at his resurrection…
Learn More
The Bible: A Historical and Literary Introduction
Bart presents his long-awaited survey of the Bible. Comprehensive yet succinct, current in scholarship, rich in pedagogical tools, and easily accessible to students of all backgrounds…
Learn More
 

 



Latest Additions


My Memory Book, Chapter 6 on “Collective Memory”
The sixth chapter of my book Jesus Before the Gospels is tentatively entitled “Collective Memory and Early Recollections of...


My Memory Book: False Memories and the Life of Jesus
As I indicated in my previous two posts, the fifth chapter of the book I’m now writing, Jesus Before The Gospels, deals wit...

One Time Donation to Foundation

Since Jan. 1, 2013, CIA has collected $104,500 for charity. You can help too! Any one-time donation to the Bart Ehrman Foundation helps Bart’s select charities fight hunger and homelessness. The optional form on the right allows reoccurring donations of your preferred limit and choice!



This is not a membership registration. If you wish to become a full member, please click REGISTER from top navigation bar.

Monthy Reoccuring Donations



When Do Donations Recur?
DailyMonthlyYearly 
How Many Times to Recur?
Never End23456789101112 
Enter Your Donation Amount



Login

Username:

Password:


 Remember Me


Register | Lost your Password?
 

 
© 2012-2015 Christianity in Antiquity (CIA): The Bart Ehrman Blog by Innovative Design

Return to Top
                          

http://ehrmanblog.org/on-debating-a-fundamentalist/











Home
About Bart
Testimonials
Register
Login
Member Content
Support
Great Courses
Contact Bart
Main Website
Mobile Users

RSS

Twitter

Facebook

YouTube

Google+
  

Christianity in Antiquity (CIA): The Bart Ehrman Blog

Membership
why & how to join







Philanthropy
assist the needy

Latest Posts
member & public

Member Forum
discussions

Bart´s Books
reviews & publishers













   


Bart’s Blog
HomeBart’s BlogOn Debating a Fundamentalist 
  
1 vote, average: 5.00 out of 51 vote, average: 5.00 out of 51 vote, average: 5.00 out of 51 vote, average: 5.00 out of 51 vote, average: 5.00 out of 5 (1 votes, average: 5.00 out of 5)
You need to be a registered member to rate this post.
Loading...



On Debating a Fundamentalist

READER COMMENT:
I just came across a post by Kyle Butt regarding your debate with him in 2014:
http://www.apologeticspress.org/APContent.aspx?category=12&article=4844
 He accuses you of “deception” and dishonesty. He says it is not credible that you spent much time writing books and going to debates, if it weren’t for the motive of convincing and persuading people that the Christian God doesn’t exist. He names you as someone who “has done as much or more than any single individual in modern times to destroy the Christian faith of literally thousands of people, young and old alike, across the globe.”

RESPONSE:
Wow.  I didn’t know about Mr. Butt’s post.   It is virtually beyond belief.   If it weren’t so outrageously funny, I would find it completely outrageous.
But look – maybe he doesn’t mean it seriously?  I mean, his rhetoric certainly seems serious.  But to say that I have “done as much or more than any single individual in modern times to destroy the Christian faith of literally thousands of people, young and old alike, across the globe” – really??  You gotta be kidding me!
On what basis does Mr. Butt make this claim?   I don’t know.  He doesn’t say.  But it ascribes to me way, way more power and influence than I have, I assure you.   The person who posted this comment asked me, in a subsequent email, if people ever write or talk to me to tell me they are either upset or happy that I caused them to lose their faith.  And frankly, I can’t think of anyone.  Maybe some have?  I really don’t know.   How does Mr. Butt know?  And how can *I* make someone “lost their faith.”  It’s not mine to give or take away.  People have their own views, based on everything they know and think.  If someone leaves the faith it’s not because someone else “made” them do it.
Very ocassionally (i.e., like once a month or so) I’ll get an email from someone who says that they appreciate my books because I articulate what they themselves have long been thinking but haven’t been able, until now, to put into words.   Sometimes people tell me that they were having serious problems with their faith and they are grateful for my honest dealings with the problems of the Bible or with the problem of suffering.
But to make me out as the Devil incarnate is really too much.  I’d like to know what grounds Mr. Butt has for asserting that I have ruined people’s lives – many thousands of people! of all ages!  across the globe!   Not just their lives, but their *eternal* lives!!  I myself, Bart Ehrman, am the reason so many thousands of people now are going to roast in hell forever!   Wow.   And there I thought I was just writing a book.
The entire post of Mr. Butt is very difficult for me to read.  Read it for yourself.  You (unlike I) might find it entertaining at least.  Two things struck me about it.  The first was Mr. Butt’s arrogant self-importance.  He really, really wants his readers to know that he was in a debate that was listened to by 100,000 people.  And he really, really, really wants everyone to know that even if he didn’t do as well as he would have liked in the debate (OK, he doesn’t concede this part J ), he certainly won and was right all along.   And not only was I, his devilish opponent, wrong, but I won’t admit I was wrong, because – this is a killer, and is the second thing that struck me – I refused to admit that I wanted to “win” the debate.
OK, so let me be as brutally honest as I can.   Mr. Butt didn’t believe me in the debate (why not just call me a liar to my face?!?)  (wait a second… I think he did!), and he won’t believe me now.  But let me say it again as forcefully as I can.  I don’t CARE if people agree with me and join with me in becoming agnostic.   REALLY!!!  I ABSOLUTELY don’t care!!  Mr. Butt does not, will not, or cannot believe me.  But it’s true.   I don’t care if you who are reading this, or anyoneI know, or anyone I don’t know, becomes an agnostic.
The reason Mr. Butt can’t believe me is because as a good fundamentalist, he thinks that ALL that matters is that people agree with HIM.  If people don’t agree with him, they are going to roast in hell forever.   For him, these are not merely issues of life and death, they are matters of eternal life and non-ending torture.   He can’t imagine talking about them without having as the one ultimate goal to save people’s souls and give them eternal life.
And if so if someone wants to talk about the problem of suffering in order to explain why it led to their agnosticism, Mr. Butt cannot believe – CANNOT believe – that the objective would be something other than to convert them to an agnostic point of view.
But that’s not my objective – OK, Mr. Butt, call me a liar once more!   And it never has been myobjective.
Why then do I talk about the matter, and have debates about the matter, and bare my soul publicly about the matter.? It is for a reason that Mr. Butt cannot understand or conceive, even when explained to him.  It is to get people to think.
Mr. Butt cannot understand this because he does not want people to think.  He wants to convince people that he’s right.  He wants to make people agree with him.  He wants to convert people.  He does not want them to reason through a problem, see its ins and outs, consider the pluses and minuses of the various positions, and come to a reasoned conclusion.  He is not interested in thinking and the possibility of various perspectives and views.  He is interested in everybody admitting that he was right all along and then joyfully joining his side.
The idea that someone doesn’t much care which side you take so long as you are more thoughtful about it is completely beyond Mr. Butt’s imagination (such imagination as he has). That’s the difference between a university professor and a fundamentalist Christian apologist.
I will say this – to one *extremely* limited sense there is a single aspect of Mr Butt’s view that I would agree with.  There is ONE form of “thought” that I wish we could get rid of.  It is the arrogant, rigid, and dogmatic kind of fundamentalism that Mr. Butt represents.  When I say that I don’t want to convert anybody to agnosticism, I really do mean it.  But I do indeed want people not to be fundamentalists.
Otherwise, I don’t care if people are Christian (even evangelical Christian), Jewish, Muslim, Hindu, Buddhist, Confucian, agnostic, atheist, pagan, or anything else.   As long as they are thinking and thoughtful (which is another way of saying non-fundamentalist) – that is all fine by me!   For Mr. Butt, that is inconceivable.  Literally.
For my part, I would like to dispel ignorance.  Mr. Butt doesn’t care about ignorance.  He would be perfectly happy for a person to be as ignorant and dumb as dirt, so long as they agree with his doctrines of God, and Christ, and salvation.   I am just the opposite.  If someone is a Christian, I want them to be a knowledgeable and thinking Christian.  Or Jew.  Or Muslim.  Or pagan.  Or agnostic.  Or atheist.   The world would be a happier and better place if we got rid of fundamentalist stupidity and ignorance, and became a more thoughtful and thinking place.  Beyond that, I really don’t care.

 
image_pdfimage_print









in
Share
.







My Debate with Dan Wallace: Is the Original NT Lost?«
Debates For A Price»


21

FEB

2015

81
  
Comments
81  Comments
0  Trackbacks




Stephen  February 21, 2015
Part of the problem – maybe the whole of the problem – is that to the fundamentalist mindset one is either actively supporting their view of religion or actively opposing it. They simply cannot wrap their heads around the idea of disinterested and dispassionate inquiry. And of course attacking your motives is simply a smokescreen to shift the focus away from them having to actually respond to your ideas.
There’s a quote attributed to e. e. cummings I believe –
“f you make people think they’re thinking they’ll love you but if you actually make them think they’ll hate you.”
Log in to Reply  



Judith  February 22, 2015
You are enabling those of us whose family and friends are fundamentalists to stand strong as a different kind of Christian. When we can no longer believe every word in the Bible was inspired by God, then through your books, debates and blog a more realistic basis for our beliefs can be established. With every opportunity I let people know I am blogging with Dr. Bart Ehrman. Some seem horrified once they look you up. Others are interested.
I could not be who I am now without you and your excellent brave work.
Log in to Reply  



Jason  February 22, 2015
I know we’re all thinking it and probably going to make the same joke, but…
This guy is such a butt.
Log in to Reply  

gmatthews

gmatthews  February 22, 2015
I didn’t care for debate in high school so I don’t know the ins and outs of it, but in reading what he wrote I didn’t entirely understand his reasoning. He was talking about how you were trying to appeal to people’s emotions with your arguments, but based on the way he described it I didn’t see it that way at all. What he says about your arguments seemed pretty logical to me. One thing about fundamentalists that irks me is that they don’t use logic when thinking about religion. The way they view the creation of man God must have given us a brain and therefore we have the ability to reason because we need a brain for that. Why would God give us the ability to reason if it allows us to reason that he doesn’t exist? And, if we can reason how can they come up with something as preposterous as his statement that “objective morality exists therefore God exists”? Even before he mentioned it my first thought was that not all cultures have the same moral values and sometimes they are diametrically opposed between cultures, but then he went on to say that you brought that up. Brilliant point….
Log in to Reply  



Jim  February 22, 2015
Well I’d say that you might have contributed to my becoming an agnostic. I asked myself; was I going to listen to an NT scholar, or was I going to listen to just any butt that came along? :)
Log in to Reply  



magpie  February 22, 2015
Unfortunately, there are some people who have convinced themselves so thoroughly of the need to maintain a certain facade that you will never persuade them through reason and fact to change their minds. I believe it is a combination of a mental obsessive compulsive disorder and narcissicism. Truly a mental illness when carried to this extent. “If I am wrong then I am nothing, so I must be right and you must acknowledge that or I will continue repeating my demands until you agree with me.” It is a sad way to live.
Log in to Reply  



prairieian  February 22, 2015
To build on the argument that you have articulated, among the things I find puzzling about the Fundamentalist perspective is their concern with me. Salvation is described as a personal relationship with God, through the one and only way, through Jesus. However, it is “personal”. Therefore, it is between me and God. No one else has a role. I will think things through and come to what conclusions I come to, but the responsibility for my thoughts, and where those thoughts might lead, remains with me, no one else. And, thank you very much, I don’t want anyone’s interest, let alone interference, in my salvation. To allow such is to take away from the personal aspect of salvation or non-salvation (damnation, I guess).
I will strive to keep thinking about these things, but I certainly do not want Fundamentalists praying for me, or expressing concern for my salvation. Salvation is my problem, not theirs.
There is a stunning arrogance with those who have all the answers. It is not attractive and it is anything but compelling.
Unfortunately, the study of religious matters is evidently not received by the non-academic world as being just another “subject”. This reality is much to be regretted and is the author of a disproportionate amount of suffering in the world. I cannot imagine a personal, caring God, should she exist, can be remotely pleased with how her creatures are behaving.
Log in to Reply  



Jim  February 22, 2015
Well spoken. Thank you for your candor.
 I am very appreciative for your helping me appreciate the Bible with a much greater depth of understanding.
 Most noise usually comes from the shallow end of the pool (borrowed fom Bishop Spong).
Log in to Reply  



Lehrerin1  February 22, 2015
A breath of fresh air here in the Bible belt……yes, there is a Bible belt in NW USA…..where Kathy McMorris Rogers is from with her Christian Bible school education……so scary!
Log in to Reply  



doug  February 22, 2015
If Mr. Butt was happy with your views, you’d know you weren’t doing a good job. Please keep up your good work. And if you get to hell before me, please save me a good seat!
Log in to Reply  



toejam  February 22, 2015
It’s a tough call whether or not it’s worth debating fundamentalists. In the creationist-evolutionist “debate”, you see people like Richard Dawkins refusing to debate them on the grounds that it gives them undeserved air-time. I.e. It looks impressive on their CV that they have debated Richard Dawkins! Wow! They must have some clout behind them!! And that’s a fair point from Dawkins. But on the other hand, people like Bill Nye see it as a valuable opportunity to express the power of the evidence & argument that supports evolution to a community who may not be aware just how overwhelming it is and whose only “understanding” of evolution is the misrepresentation that they’ve been taught by their fundamentalist pastors. So given that you do debate fundamentalists occasionally, have you considered the Dawkins position that debating them may in fact be giving them undeserved air time? And why do you side for the latter? (I’m not sure where I would stand if I were in your position)
Log in to Reply  
Bart

Bart  February 23, 2015
It’s a constant debate with my self. Maybe I’ll post on it at some point.
Log in to Reply  


Hon Wai  February 24, 2015
Maybe set a precondition for debate with a fundamentalist that he (interestingly enough, all the well-known names in fundamentalist circles are men) has a sense of humour.
Log in to Reply  



Judith  February 27, 2015
Maybe you do it to keep lighting that one candle wherever and whenever you can…
Log in to Reply  


Judith  February 27, 2015
The 2/27 comment about lighting that one candle is supposed to be after your 2/23 “It’s a constant debate with my self” comment. Somehow it ended up in the wrong place. Sorry.
Log in to Reply  
 
 
 



Robert  February 22, 2015
One question–why do you bother debating with people like that?
Log in to Reply  
Bart

Bart  February 23, 2015
I may post on that sometime.
Log in to Reply  


Judith  February 24, 2015
If you do, Dr. Ehrman, keep in mind there are some fantastically wonderful fundamentalists. My sister and brother (I could never call that beloved brother-in-law anything but a real brother to me) are fundamentalists to the extreme. He is a Gideon. She lives to serve in any and every way possible as does he. He says if you cannot trust that the Bible is the Word of God, what can you trust. She says we cannot understand the mind of God and that’s why there are things in the Bible that cannot be explained. These are extremely well educated people.
Log in to Reply  
 
 

Aleph82

Aleph82  February 22, 2015
“Orthodoxy means not thinking–not needing to think. Orthodoxy is unconsciousness.” – Winston Smith
Quoting from Orwell today (or well, anyone) risks making you sound boring rather than profound, but it was so appropriate I couldn’t resist. There’s a personal irony I found in this post: your books and the others they have led me to have softened my atheism considerably. I’m not a believer, and I doubt I ever will be, but I no longer feel the need to “convert” people or ridicule their faith. That behaviour now seems unnecessary and tacky.
Today I rarely mention my atheism save for posts like this or when I’m accused of being a Christian apologist by mythicists. A happy by-product of this newly found timidity is an exponential expansion of my dating pool. Highly recommended.
Log in to Reply  
Bart

Bart  February 23, 2015
Absolutely *great* book!!
Log in to Reply  
 

Rosekeister

Rosekeister  February 22, 2015
“Bart D. Ehrman, James A. Gray Distinguished Professor at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Destroyer of the Christian Faith and the Devil Incarnate.”
If this continues, your name will be similar to long royal titles like the Queen of England and you will be able to name any fee for speaking. It has also just struck me that you could probably raise money selling t-shirts with your picture on the front and the above title on the back. Both believers and nonbelievers would buy them although for different reasons. There are websites where you can design t-shirts, coffee mugs and any number of items for sale and then link the the blog to them.
Log in to Reply  



Hank_Z  February 22, 2015
Terrific response, Bart!
Any chance you’d give me permission to post the question and
 your response on Facebook? Or make it available to “share”?
Log in to Reply  
Bart

Bart  February 23, 2015
Sure, go ahead, as long as you credit the original source.
Log in to Reply  
 



Jeff  February 22, 2015
Very, very funny. And by the way Bart, since you have such powers, according to Butt, how about using it on those #15 ranked Tarheels?
Log in to Reply  
Bart

Bart  February 23, 2015
don’t I wish…
Log in to Reply  
 



Jim-Prup-Benton  February 22, 2015
Well put. I might be tempted to ask if there aren’t certain concepts in certain religions that make the sort of attitude and thought you look for difficult to nearly impossible. For example, that “Doubt is, in itself, sinful” — too often seen as a corollary of ‘Salvation by faith alone.’ That might be for another time.
But there is one attitude that is even worse than the fundamentalist one, and that is the attitude that ‘anyone who disagrees is part of the conspiracy’ — for religious people with the frequent implication of a ‘Satanic conspiracy.’ That’s the one that makes any communication impossible as long as it remains.
I am, instead of following through on this now, going to take advantage of a general offer you made and drop a totally off-topic question into the thread to reach you and hopefully to get an answer. But I realized earlier that I had heard of the “Church in Jerusalem” and the “Church in Rome” and of Paul’s many churches, but had never heard of a “Church in Galilee.” That’s where the ‘witnesses’ were, the ones who actually heard Jesus preach, who had seen what ever tiny kernel of truth was blown into the ‘wonder stories’ and who had followed his teaching without literally following him to Jerusalem. You’d think it natural that this might even be the numerically largest church for the first decade or two. After all, Jesus was only in Jerusalem for a few days, of preaching, at a time of celebrations and rituals and, almost certainly confusion. (And wouldn’t it be likely that many preachers would head to Jerusalem for the Passover — and compete with Jesus?)
Wouldn’t at least one apostle — all of whom were Galileans — have returned home and attempted to set up a church where Jesus actually walked? Yet I know of no mention of such a Church — admittedly what I know is far from complete. Is there any mention or other textual or architectural evidence showing if such a church actually existed — and if not, has anyone ever asked why.it made so little impression.
Log in to Reply  


Wilusa  February 24, 2015
I hope Bart will reply to this! Seems like a great question, that I’ve never thought of.
Log in to Reply  
Bart

Bart  February 25, 2015
sorry — what’s the question?
Log in to Reply  


Jim-Prup-Benton  February 25, 2015
I DO tend to be long-winded and lose people, sorry. The question is why we never hear of, and what we know of a Church in Galilee. Again, it seems obvious there would be one, but is there any record of one?
Log in to Reply  
Bart

Bart  February 28, 2015
From the NT period? No, not really.
 
 



Wilusa  February 25, 2015
The one Jim-Prup-Benton asked, about why we’ve never heard of a Church in Galilee.
Log in to Reply  
 
 
 



Seeking1  February 22, 2015
Amen! Mr. Butt…very appropriately named.
Log in to Reply  



sashko123  February 22, 2015
I just listened to this debate on YouTube. To Butt, the human sense of injustice is stronger evidence for the existence of God (i.e. Yahweh) than all of the physical evidence consistent with his non-existence;. I’ve come to think that if God does not intervene, he is at least irrelevant if not imaginary. What sense is there in debating fundamentalists whose ironclad proof of God’s existence is premised upon a nonfalsifiable assertion — objective moral values exist! Really?? Wow.
Log in to Reply  

Gary

Gary  February 22, 2015
I just finished watching the entire three hour debate. It made me think if I went to heaven and spend eternity listening to him….well that sounds like hell to me!
Log in to Reply  



MikeyS  February 22, 2015
There is a view that some Christians despise the thought that God would forgive and accept atheists into heaven. They cannot accept that no matter what other faith people have or how good they have lived or given time and money to good causes and charities for the hungry and disavantaged of the world, as they didn’t accept Jesus as their saviour, then that’s it. Hell for you my lad/lass!
In fact its been said that Christians would love to actually see all these people in hell.
IF they thought even a little bit more about what they believe. They would surely come to a different conclusion and indeed IF they believe that God is good, loving and just. Even more so. In the OT book of Jonah, he was really disappointed that God would not punish the people of the pagan city of Ninevah because he thought as non believers, they should be. It really is laughable that fundamental Christians want to convert Jewish people who were there first.
Log in to Reply  



Joseph  February 22, 2015
Your words (in books, debates, and on this blog) make people think.
Thinking is not welcome in 2015 in the US of A (and perhaps elsewhere). This is demonstrably the case not only in religious matters, but in a wide range of important and unimportant elements. Consider:
— Unemployment rate said to be under 6%, but the government has placed tens of millions in a “we don’t want to count them” category. The real employment rate might be 15% or higher (who can know?) BUT: No one cares.
— widespread lying by the US government to get the country into the 2003 Iraq War. There were no WMDs. Saddam had nothing to do with 9/11. Yet polls show a significant (20%-plus) group STILL thinks Saddam had something to do with 9/11. And, more importantly, NO ONE WAS PROSECUTED……the Democrats had 60 votes in the Senate in 2009, and yet did not convene a single committee to review how we were led into a war. No one was called to account for lying to us to get us to enter what is now a multi-decade war
— no one has gone to jail for the economic follies of 2007-2009. This despite the fact that, clearly, fortunes were made (on the backs of the little people). WORSE: There is no protest over this.
— the weakened positions of many state governments has them looking into rolling back pension $$$ promised to retirees (this has already happened). These governments made promises, signed contracts, and now are walking about from them. Do you hear anything about this on the Internet or on TV news? Forget the pensioners who are so ill-treated: If governments establish the precedent that they can walk away from inconvenient promises whenever they like . . . where does this end?
— economic recovery is broadcast by the President, and Republicans seek to take credit for it, and the stock market is “high.” Yet the vast majority of people live on roughly the same income they made 30 years ago. With higher costs.
— have you seen what’s on TV? You might not watch it, but tens of millions do.Latest innovation worth noting (I’ve seen it in advertisements): Sex Box (that’s the name of a new TV show). There are TV shows about midgets and fat people (my 600-pound life). It’s a 24-hour circus, brought right into your living room! All you have to do to avoid it is turn the damn thing off . . . if folks did that, this stuff would go away. They don’t. Why not?
— McDonald’s serves 70 million people daily. Think about that for a moment. These are personal choices made — if I may — without thinking. It’s almost a reflex.
— More attention is paid to the hind quarters of someone named Kardashian on a daily basis — by tens of millions — then is given YEARLY by the same people to the idea that we could build a better world for our children by looking into alternatives like electric cars, solar power, etc.
Fundamentalists will NOT be helped by people thinking. You are asking some people to think. The result is not a good thing for fundamentalists.
To give the person opposing you his due: If he really believes what he says — that those of us who do NOT believe as he does will go directly to Hell — then he definitely must call you the Anti-Christ. You are, in that view, leading people down the path to abomination and perpetual torture.
I believe you already KNOW all of this — someplace inside your brain — and that you were caught short by Butt because you live in a bubble (a college atmosphere). Take a drive at 630am to the 7-11 and watch (and listen to) the people who buy breakfast there (each morning). Go to a McDonald’s at 5pm and look around. Check out the attendance at a movie that makes a US sniper out to be some kind of hero.
The real world (USofA, anyway) consists of people who may not be ignorant — but who definitely want to go along through their lives in a state of uniformed bliss. The presence of tens of millions in such a trance is advantageous to people like Dick Cheney (evil-doer), Jamie Dimon (banker) — and Mr. Butt.
Log in to Reply  



walid  February 22, 2015
professor Ehrman
Even though I might not agree with you all the way …
I say
 you are a CREDIT to your family
 you are a CREDIT to knowledge and scholarship
 you are a CREDIT to the USA
 you are a CREDIT to this world
 you are a CREDIT to the human race.
those who don’t appreciate your effforts only do that due to problems that are not your fault.
Log in to Reply  
Bart

Bart  February 23, 2015
Thank you!
Log in to Reply  
 

kooter

kooter  February 22, 2015
You said: “The world would be a happier and better place if we got rid of fundamentalist stupidity and ignorance, and became a more thoughtful and thinking place.”
I live in Kansas, home state of that kind of ignorance and stupidity. This state became well known for the attempt made by the state school board to redefine the meaning of *science* to include visions of Adam riding around Eden on a dinosaur in public school curriculums. And our current Kansas Governor recently rescinded the preceding governor’s executive order which had prohibited employment discrimination against LGBT persons in the state’s executive branch.
(If I close my eyes and squint into the far, dim, past, I can almost envision watching our Governor, in his formative childhood years, going out of his way to run across a busy street just for the pleasure of kicking a stray dog limping along on the other side.)
And so I personally thank you for your visit to Kansas to speak, (at the invitation of a Wichita church!), on your “How Jesus Became God” book. Observing as an outsider to the congregation, I hope that many in the audience had a chance to experience for themselves that even pew seats can furnish the opportunity for “a more thoughtful and thinking place”.
Log in to Reply  



Alan  February 22, 2015
Dr. Ehrman,
 Contrary to what Mr. Butt says, you have helped at least one person with his faith. Granted, it’s not what he (or my own pastor) would agree with, but, to use use a couple of quotes mistakenly attributed to Thomas Jefferson, “I am of a sect by myself, as far as I know”, and “Say nothing of my religion. It is known to my god and myself alone.” You have helped me develop from an agnosticism to a ‘gnosticism’ of sorts; I believe in God, and I believe that God does not have a religion. Religion was the creation of man as a way to control his fellow man.
 Your writing has helped me to realize that Jesus was a real person and teacher, but that he is the son of God in the same way that we are all sons of God.
 In short, Thank You!
Log in to Reply  


Jim  February 24, 2015
In response to “quotes mistakenly attributed to Thomas Jefferson,” our Sunday School class recently discussed deism as espoused by Jefferson (Jesus as a moral teacher, but not God, no virgin birth, no resurrection, etc.).
 Wikipedia (which I have found as fairly reliable, though not perfect of course), article on the Jefferson Bible includes the following quote:
 Jefferson’s claim to be a Christian was made in response to those who accused him of being otherwise, due to his unorthodox view of the Bible and conception of Christ. Recognizing his rather unique views, Jefferson stated in a letter (1819) to Ezra Stiles Ely, “You say you are a Calvinist. I am not. I am of a sect by myself, as far as I know.”[33]
 Letter from Thomas Jefferson to Ezra Stiles Ely, June 25, 1819, Encyclopedia Virginia.
 This appears to be rather reliable source for this Jefferson quote, or am I deceived?
Log in to Reply  
Bart

Bart  February 25, 2015
I don’t know. Very interesting!
Log in to Reply  
 
 



RonaldTaska  February 22, 2015
Wow!
1. Look I have read all of your trade books, read all of your blogs, listened to all of your youtube videos, completed all of your great courses and had some private email correspondence with you and what struck me is that Mr. Butt keeps describing a Dr.Ehrman who is nothing like the Dr. Ehrman I have come to know and respect. Who in the world is he describing?
 2. Contrary to what Mr. Butt says, you clearly describe the punishment, redemptive, and apocalyptic Biblical explanations for suffering in “God’s Problem.”
3. That I have encountered many who feel and argue like Mr. Butt is the main reason I no longer attend church and now check the “none” column in the religion questionnaires. It has just been too frustrating! Too much dogmatic certainty! Too judgmental! Too little compassion. Too little thinking. Too little reading of the entire Bible.
 I just couldn’t swallow it anymore. They drove me off….
Log in to Reply  



Philbert  February 22, 2015
Thank you for posting your thoughts. I saw the debate- great debate- and it amazes me how fundamentalists can claim cosmic truth for their beliefs and twist the evidence we have. It’s impossible to talk to these kind of people. I have to deal with this kind in my own family. They accuse me of: Hating God, loving sin, having no moral compass, having no moral framework on which to form my beliefs, being a philosopher, misunderstanding the bible, taking the bible out of context and “Not getting it”- and other religious texts not in the bible are anti-christ or the devil. They just can’t see how their “evidence” is not evidence to me and they will not budge an inch. Kinda like talking to a child except they need a spanking- lol…
Log in to Reply  



RoelNdeLeeuwBec  February 22, 2015
Dear Bart,
I lost my faith in the infallibility of the Holy Scriptures because of the arguments I found against it, combined with a new view on how to process religious experience. One of these arguments concerned the inspiration theory and the lower critique. For your contribution to this later process, I am extremely grateful, but it was my decision and my call; not yours, nor was it your responsibility.
Those who take you for a scientist, will clearly see, that you have a passion for Christianity, as one of the pillars of Western Culture and ethics. As you are not responsible for the beliefs people had in the past, neither are you for their current beliefs. You try to do your job right, and that is a good thing. All we can do as reasonable persons, is to find warrant for our basic beliefs about things.
In science we try to focus upon such beliefs for which we can find evidence. This does not render scientific beliefs more true, as science itself is based on uncertainty, but rather focuses on such beliefs that are empirically accessible in the sense that they make predictions that can be tested.
Not all true things, occurrences, statements or beliefs can be reproduced or generalized, as beside the structural side, there also is the individual component, like e.g. some value your work more as others. But not our appreciation of this or that theory or belief is what counts, but the extent to which it helps us to see things more clearly, so we are more knowledgeable and less ignorant.
Perhaps, dear Bart, you may not be right with everything – and you never claimed such a thing – but your work and arguments are plausible. Some may not like that, but then it is their job to prove you wrong. Not with an internet post, but with a scholarly valid argument. Anything else is, for as far as I see it, ordinary propaganda.
Roel N. de Leeuw B.ec
Log in to Reply  
cheriq

cheriq  February 26, 2015
I’d lost my faith long before I had heard of Dr. Ehrman. I suppose there was a time I thought I was a “born again” Christian – back when I was taken to church constantly, and surrounded by family and peers who were “born agains”. However; it was in my own study of the NT – not just READING, but studying in a parallel fashion that I became aware of the inconsistencies between the gospels (particularly the nativity in Matthew and Luke), and realized that Paul taught a different doctrine than Jesus did. Fortunately, I didn’t need to learn Hebrew and Greek to find the truth about the Bible. I couldn’t have gone as far as Dr. Ehrman with education. When I found I did not believe in the Nicene creed is when I dropped the Christian label, and it has been freedom! I’m not an agnostic; but, am a Deist – as Thomas Jefferson, Thomas Paine and other marvelous intellectuals and leaders….probably Einstein, as well!
Log in to Reply  
 



sashko123  February 22, 2015
How is it that fundamentalists are suddenly protectors of logic over appeals to emotion anyway? Another stroll through Bizarro World.
Log in to Reply  
Bart

Bart  February 23, 2015
I know, it’s strange. They really are children of the Enlightenment. Go figure.
Log in to Reply  
 



alienvoodoo  February 23, 2015
Dr, Bart,
 I found the debate on Youtube http://youtu.be/8FRtKANMXCQ…after watching the entire debate and subjecting my self to this arrogant, incoherent, and sadly ignorant apologist, I now know the meaning of suffering and have a whole new appreciation and admiration for you. I found myself cringing several times, and know that i could not have handled this as well as you did. Hats off to you!
Log in to Reply  



mjordan20149  February 23, 2015
Let me just say that you are a better writer than Mr. Butt and leave it at that. I wasn’t impressed by his blog post as literature. Mark Twain might have called it “literary chloroform.”
Log in to Reply  



Kevin  February 23, 2015
Great post. I appreciate that you are so forthcoming.
 If I may ask:
 Are you angry that fundamentals deceived you as a youth and want to get back at them? Do you want to rescue others from your experience of being misled? Both?
Log in to Reply  
Bart

Bart  February 23, 2015
I mainly want people not to be misled by comfortable and plausbile-sounding stupidity.
Log in to Reply  


spiker  February 24, 2015
New Bumper sticker? Tshirt?
Log in to Reply  
 
 



Gary  February 23, 2015
I very much appreciate you discussing this issue, Dr. E., but I don’t think you realize the earth shattering effect that you and your books are having upon fundamentalist Christianity.
One year ago, this month, I was a devout, fundamentalist Christian scouring the internet for potential converts to MY version of fundamentalist Christianity (orthodox Lutheranism). I came across the blog of an ex-fundamentalist Baptist pastor (Bruce Gerencser) and read his story of deconversion. I decided that this blaspheming atheist needed to be set straight, so I started sharing the “Truth” with him. It was downhill (for me) from there.
After briefly entertaining my arrogance, Gerencser referred me to three of your books and said, “I will not debate you any further until you read Ehrman’s books.” So I read them. The first book I read was “Misquoting Jesus”. As a fundamentalist, I had grown up believing that the existing manuscripts of the Bible, in the original languages, contained no errors. I was blown away to learn of all the scribe alterations. The more I read your books the more I began to question the inerrancy of the Bible, the foundation of my belief system. I went to several pastors of my denomination for help. They mostly told me to go read apologists’ books for the answers and that all Biblical “discrepancies” have long ago been harmonized. There are no errors. There are no discrepancies. So I read NT Wright’s 800 page work “The Resurrection of the Son of God”. I didn’t find his principle “evidence” for the Resurrection convincing: that “no Jew would have believed that a man had been resurrected unless he really HAD been resurrected”. The fact is, the overwhelming majority of Jews did NOT believe the story, and have not believed the story for 2,000 years. The fact that a small group of Jesus’ uneducated, Galilean peasant disciples did believe it should not be a surprise.
After four months of gut-wrenching agony, grasping at every straw I could to keep my cherished Christian faith, I abandoned my belief in Jesus as my Lord and Savior. I no longer believed that the Bible was inerrant or inspired. I no longer believed that Jesus had been raised from the dead or that he was God. I was an agnostic.
I still have a lot of discussions with fundamentalist Christians (I still love to debate the Bible…just from the other side). I can tell you for sure, Dr. Ehrman, you are Enemy Number One among fundamentalist and evangelical Christians. I agree with them: many, many people are deconverting from fundamentalist Christianity because of you and your books. But I see it as a GOOD thing. Fundamentalism, in any form, and in any religion, is deadly. Millions upon millions of people have died at the hands of pious Christians who believed that they were doing the will of God.
I have no issue with liberal Christianity or any religion that is non-exclusivist. But any belief system that teaches that “we” are right and everyone else is not only wrong, but evil…must be opposed. You, Dr. Ehrman, may not intentionally be converting people to agnosticism, but you are nontheless. And I thank you for it! I, myself, DO try to convert others, not to agnosticism or atheism, but to non-fundamentalism, and, to the abandonment of supernatural superstitions, the root cause of all religious fundamentalism. Fundamentalist Christianity is an evil superstition that needs to be yanked out by the roots.
Log in to Reply  
Bart

Bart  February 23, 2015
Thanks for your comments. Good luck as you keep forging ahead.
Log in to Reply  

cheriq

cheriq  February 26, 2015
Exactly, Gary. What I can appreciate in Dr. Ehrman’s writing is his simplicity and straight-forwardness. His audience is not limited to the erudite types. That may be what makes him seen as so “dangerous” — he reaches the uneducated who’ve been easily brain-washed. And I DO mean, literally, brain-washed. Ever sit through the music played during an invitational (altar call)? I’d say it affects the beta waves (anxious people tend to produce an overabundance of high beta waves).
Log in to Reply  
 

Ryan Pence

Ryan Pence  February 23, 2015
As a thinking person, it was plain for me to see the depth of your compassion and determination to have an impact for good in the world, especially when it comes to ignoring our instinct to behave in the egocentric ways so many of us do. I can AND could, see from your body language and facial expressions alone, your committment to doing everything you can do, to help end avoidable suffering in the world. Bravo Dr. Ehrman! If you want to thank someone for everything that you’ve been blessed, thank YOURSELF! You make me want to be a better person, a more giving person. I consider myself to live a life in poverty, but after hearing you speak of the avoidable, very fixable suffering in the world, I feel truly thankful myself, for a life at America’s poverty rate would be the life of a king in other parts of the world. Bravo Dr. Ehrman, BRAVO!!
Log in to Reply  



RonaldTaska  February 23, 2015
1. I think your main point has always been, not the conversion of others to your viewpoint, but that Christianity is important enough that it merits the critical examination of crucial questions.
 2. I have spent considerable time on the “Apologetics Press” website where Mr. Butt writes. They clearly have an answer to every “apparent” Biblical contradiction and every “apparent” Biblical historical discrepancy. It must be really nice to have an answer to everything. My first question to them is if the Bible is inspired, why in the world does it require so much apologetics from expert apologists?
 3. The ten principles of truth outlined on the website include the statements that the entire universe was created in six approximately 24-hour days, the books of the Bible are inerrant, and those enjoying salvation are members of the one true undenominational church, namely the Churches of Christ.
 4. I was a member of the Churches of Christ, of which Mr. Butt is a member, for over 50 years and found it to be a very difficult experience because of its dogmatic certainty and exclusivity.
 5. I suggest that you just let Mr. Butt bask in the glory of knowing it all and having the “truth” and let it go and move on with your scholarly work. There is just too much nastiness expressed in his viewpoint.
Log in to Reply  



dragonfly  February 23, 2015
I haven’t read the article but from your post I think I get the idea. I agree with all you say in your post, although my attitude towards fundamentalists has softened somewhat. Kyle’s attacks are clearly not helpful to anyone, but his approach is not that dissimilar to someone like Richard Dawkins, who believes God doesn’t exist and therefore everyone should become atheists. I have noticed the occasional anti-religion sentiment from members of this blog too. I would really like to recommend to anyone to read “Why God won’t go away” by Dr Andrew Newberg. He’s a neuroscientist who has been studying religion and the brain. The book talks about the science behind the nature of belief and why we believe things. Bart, if you haven’t read it I think it would be helpful with your next book about the time before the gospels. In short, belief has little to do with what’s real and true. The human brain cares little for what’s real and true, only for what is useful. I understand why some people need fundamentalism.
Log in to Reply  



mary  February 23, 2015
I tried to read the complete article by Mr. Butt. I could not. First, I thought it was a joke, he must have had a terrible time as a child due to his name.
 I am not sure the best way to go about this so I decided to add as short a paragraph as I can, from my own perspective.
I had been trying to read and understand the Bible for a few years now. I knew since before I retired that I needed to read what was in the bible for myself. I had questions about what I was being told it said. Yet I could not get a handle on reading the book (books) myself to come to a place of understanding, without listening to interpretations from others that were not clear, contradictory and sometimes made no sense to. This effort led me to numerous writings and explanations from many people present and past. It was not until I purchased your Teaching Company Course, covering the New Testament that I had found a teacher who could explain the bible as a book in a way I could understand and most importantly without an agenda. You give honest, open and reasoned bases for what is and was believed, by whom and thoroughly explained. Now it would be great if your critics could respect people for taking responsibility for what they believe and how they live based on their own decision, independent of others interpretation.
It seems as though your critics want people to have complete faith, trust and confidence in THEM not the god of their teaching. What I believe is now an informed and adult choice. Thank you so much for giving me the knowledge necessary to continue on a learning journey I hope will last my lifetime. You are a great teacher. Please do not let this foolish criticism take up too much energy and time from doing what is important very interesting.
Log in to Reply  

Fearguth

Fearguth  February 23, 2015
When he says that Bart Ehrman “has done as much or more than any single individual in modern times to destroy the Christian faith of literally thousands of people, young and old alike, across the globe,” Kyle Butt is, in an allegorical way, describing the threat, as he perceives it, your speaking/writing poses to HIS faith. As Ernest Becker says (in ‘Escape from Evil’), “If your adversary wins the argument about truth, you die. Your immortality system has been shown to be fallible, your life becomes fallible.”
Log in to Reply  
cheriq

cheriq  February 26, 2015
Very insightful, Fearguth!
Log in to Reply  
 



spiker  February 23, 2015
Time and time again, a video will appear after you’ve debated someone, William Lane Craig etc
 explaining why you were wrong in the debate. The implication seems to be they thought you won and
 now need to explain why you didn’t when you’re not around to respond. Though, there’s also
 the status bump: I debated Bart Ehrman and survived or something to that effect.
 Then there are folks like Mr. Butt – a candidate for the Ehrman project?- who can’t even acknowledge that your premise has any merit.
Thomas Huxley, IMHO, defined Agnosticism precisely with the Kyle Butts of the world in mind:
“[B]etween Agnosticism and Ecclesiasticism, or, as our neighbours across the Channel call it, Clericalism, there can be neither peace nor truce. The Cleric asserts that it is morally wrong not to believe certain propositions, whatever the results of a strict scientific investigation of the evidence of these propositions. He tells us “that religious error is, in itself, of an immoral nature.”He declares that he has prejudged certain conclusions, and looks upon those who show cause for arrest of judgment as emissaries of Satan. It necessarily follows that, for him, the attainment of faith, not the ascertainment of truth, is the highest aim of mental life.”
Here we get a bit more clarity on (Fifty Shades of Agnosticism?) what Huxley had in mind when he coined the term Agnosticism. On the one hand, He is defining it by HOW one knows rather than what one knows and that he seems to use the word gnostic as a synonym for unjustified certainty
 I don’t want to cast aspersions on all fundamentalists, per se, and Huxley correctly understood
 the distinction
“With scientific Theology, Agnosticism has no quarrel. On the contrary, the Agnostic, knowing too well the influence of prejudice and idiosyncrasy, even on those who desire most earnestly to be impartial, can wish for nothing more urgently than that the scientific theologian should not only be at perfect liberty to thresh out the matter in his own fashion; but that he should, if he can, find flaws in the Agnostic position; and, even if demonstration is not to be had, that he should put, in their full force, the grounds of the conclusions he thinks probable. The scientific theologian admits the Agnostic principle, however widely his results may differ from those reached by the majority of Agnostics.”
Log in to Reply  

cadmium

cadmium  February 23, 2015
As a former bible thumping, Jesus movement, radical fundamentalist, it bothered me that, at one point in my life, I could not tell the basic difference between me and those whom I opposed. Militant, unyielding, incredibly narrow minded, and a 2 dimensional understanding of what my belief system included; that was a good description of it. Not that I thought that I was that way, but that I would have leaned more heavily toward Mr. Butt POV than anything else. Unfortunately, I thought I was deep. I had read all the right books, gone to the good schools, and bolstered my knowledge with copious amount of instruction.
But was I any different that “my enemy”? No, not really…. and that was deeply troubling. Yeshua (Jesus, Christ, Son of God, whatever you want to call him) called his followers to be different and live by a different set of rules.
After 10 years of questioning everything i believed, I came across “Did Jesus Exsist?”. Life Changing. seriously.
I then, over the course of the next year, devoured just about every thing else you have written (I am currently stuck in the middle of “Forgery and Counterforgery”) and found that I now have a deeper and more rich understanding of the underpinnings and foundations of Christianity. Your work on the textual critique of the NT and its implications was foundation to my understanding of the what and why of my faith. It has made it stronger.
One of the best “gospel messages” I have ever heard/read was in “Peter, Paul, and Mary Magdalene” in the chapter on Paul. This reality of life that we call “Paul” changed my religious life. It explained in real terms with logic and history the basis for my understanding the Christian faith.
Dr. Ehrman, I am still a crackpot and radical, but at least I am learning to ask the real questions before I spout off and to be more thoughtful of my fellow man and understanding of our shared experience.
Thanks for your hard work.
Log in to Reply  



daviskent  February 24, 2015
Debating a fundamentalist strikes me to be not much different than arguing with a climate change denier or lately the anti-vaccine crowd. It really doesn’t matter what, how much, or overwhelmingly credible the evidence against their position, all that we’re really doing is providing material which they can and will manipulate, twist and then reuse for their own purposes to others of their ilk in order to keep the herd mentality in line. It strikes me more and more as simply pointless and perhaps it would be better (and easier) to provide the truth in the broadest possible ways, and hope for best.
Log in to Reply  



Mark  February 24, 2015
I hear Mr. Butt (appropriate name) has written to Santa Claus to petition him not to bring your presents next year, naughty boy.
Log in to Reply  



Hon Wai  February 24, 2015
I just noticed another striking claim from Butt’s post:
“After pouring over Dr. Ehrman’s materials, meeting him in a head-to-head debate, and praying for him frequently, I pity him most because HE NOW LIVES A LIFE WITHOUT HOPE and without God in this world.” (my capitalisation)
 He obviously hasn’t read enough of Dr. Ehrman’s materials – lots of people would envy the wonderful life Dr. Ehrman has and enjoys – stimulating job he loves, financial resources from academic job in a leading state university and popular writings, bestselling author, philanthrophy activities to do his little bit to give hope to less fortunate people, his wonderful family and much else. Fundamentalists love to tell people they are praying for them, as if this is such an altruistic loving act, when simultaneously they have no hesitation slandering the same people they so lovingly prayed for, accusing them of deception, dishonesty and the like.
Log in to Reply  
Bart

Bart  February 25, 2015
Yeah, it’s pretty pitiable if someone pities *me*!!
Log in to Reply  
 



Sharon  February 24, 2015
Prior to discovering you existed (!) I was confused and harsh on myself for not believing everything I was taught. My teachings from family and church just didn’t make sense to me, but Heaven Forbid I ever express this! My great luck was encountering you on a cruise ship when for three days you spoke and taught. I was additionally privileged to have a private conversation with you when you were diligently trying to read/study by the ship’s pool, and you graciously allow me to asked you a few questions, beginning with a belief or non belief position on reincarnation. It was then you shared with me that you did not have a belief in God, and you were extremely gracious in explaining your reasoning when I asked why. As I look at all your books lining my bookshelf, (I think I have them all!) I will be forever grateful for the education you have provided me, bringing a complete sense of comfort in my understanding and current beliefs. I’m not the prolific writer of the authors of many of your posts, who are obviously much more educated in these subjects, but I continue to learn and appreciated you more than words can say.
Log in to Reply  



reedm60  February 25, 2015
Dr Ehrman,
At the end of the debate, one of the announcers claimed that we had 99.5% of the original text of the New Testament. You told him that number cannot be verified without the originals. I have also seen this number thrown around beside Dr Metzger’s name on Matt Slick’s website, http://www.carm.org. Did Dr Metzger really believe we had that just of the original? Or is this just fundamentalist wishful thinking?
Log in to Reply  


reedm60  February 25, 2015
I meant, Did Dr Metzger really believe we had that much of the original?
Log in to Reply  
Bart

Bart  February 28, 2015
Yup.
Log in to Reply  
 

Bart

Bart  February 28, 2015
Yes, I think Metzger did believe that we are sure about the vast majority of the cases where there is variation. But I should stress, this was a *belief*.
Log in to Reply  


reedm60  March 2, 2015
I think the 99.5% number is a typical example of fundamentalists being misleading because it fails to factor in all of the extra text that has been added down through the centuries. An unknowing person sees that 99.5% number and thinks, ‘Wow! The King James Version of the Bible is 99.5% identical to what the original authors wrote! It’s a miracle!’
Anyway, in your debate with Dan Wallace some time ago, you said that in 2005 scholars got together to produce what was supposedly the ‘original’ Greek text of the New Testament. Then, in 2010, another group of scholars got together to do the same thing. You then said that these two works differ in almost 6000 places. That is a lot more than 0.5%!
Log in to Reply  
Bart

Bart  March 3, 2015
Well, if 99 words are correct, and only one isn’t, but that word happens to be the word “not” — it would be a big deal!
Log in to Reply  
 
 
 



Joshua  February 26, 2015
Excellent rejoinder.
Log in to Reply  



fred  February 27, 2015
Does this experience make you any more, or less inclined to debate fundamentalists? The bad news is the public abuse you receive. The good news is that you might actually light a fire under a few fundamentalists (and of course, there’s the money you make for your charity).
Log in to Reply  
Bart

Bart  February 28, 2015
Yes, I keep thinking about the positive. If that were not attainable, my opponents would not be so vociferous and mean-spirited in attacking me!
Log in to Reply  
 



johnfelon  March 1, 2015
Mr. Butt, in addition to having a very appropriate name, doesn’t understand how rational people lose their faith. It doesn’t happen by reading a book. It doesn’t happen by reading ten books. It happens by reading hundreds of books and experiencing life over a period of decades.
I was 8 years-old when I first sought evidence to support the stories I heard during mass each Sunday.
I was 13 when I decided I no longer believed that Jesus was divine, but I still tried to follow his teachings about love and peace.
In my 20s, I regarded myself as agnostic, but did not consider myself an atheist until two years ago. I am now 43.
Looking back, what I find interesting are the endless rationalizations I gave to God and his agents. Nearly two decades passed between my first doubts and the point where I finally recognized and embraced my lack of faith. I did not casually cast off my belief. I couldn’t, because it was too precious to me. It was my identity. Instead, I gave it every possible chance and begrudgingly caved to rational thought. That’s what Mr. Butt and others like him can’t seem to understand.
So Dr. Ehrman…let’s strike a deal. You keep seeking the truth, and I’ll keep reading your books. Fair?
Log in to Reply  
Bart

Bart  March 3, 2015
Sounds good to me.
Log in to Reply  
 



gavm  March 5, 2015
Bart i think your more influential than you think.
 i for one didnt believe the jesus existed until i listened to you. when i first learnt that the new test was written so long after the fact in a foreign country in a foreign lang, it just made more sense to me the he was prob made up like Hercules or Adam and Eve. it was when i read some of yr books and listen on the great courses that i learnt the historical method and that it all makes more sense if he prob did live. point being dont underestimate yourself.
when he says youve hurt christanity i assume he means the evangelic sort, if which you have put a lot of hole in it quite famously (to the point that your a hero to many muslims!). i can see why they would fear you
PS. i understand your frustration debating mythicists. damm painful
Log in to Reply  

Subscribe to Comments

You must be logged in to post a comment.




Search by Keyword or User Name


  

Bart’s Recent Posts

My Memory Book, Chapter 6 on “Collective Memory”
April 22, 2015

My Memory Book: False Memories and the Life of Jesus
April 20, 2015

BBC Clip on “The Lost Gospels”
April 19, 2015

On Being Controversial
April 18, 2015

“The Same” Traditions in Oral Cultures
April 17, 2015

Differences Between Oral and Written Cultures
April 16, 2015

My Memory Book, Chapter 4 Again: The Death of Jesus
April 15, 2015

What Is A Memory?
April 13, 2015

Ramblings on Charity and Religion
April 11, 2015

Can A Made-Up Story Be A False Memory?
April 10, 2015

My Memory Book, Ch. 4a
April 10, 2015

My Memory Book, ch. 3
April 8, 2015

My Memory Book, chs. 1-2
April 7, 2015

How I’m Writing This Book
April 6, 2015

Sketch of My Memory Book
April 4, 2015

Archives
Select Month April 2015  (17) March 2015  (27) February 2015  (21) January 2015  (22) December 2014  (26) November 2014  (23) October 2014  (23) September 2014  (26) August 2014  (26) July 2014  (25) June 2014  (25) May 2014  (42) April 2014  (42) March 2014  (39) February 2014  (37) January 2014  (45) December 2013  (45) November 2013  (40) October 2013  (45) September 2013  (42) August 2013  (44) July 2013  (48) June 2013  (45) May 2013  (40) April 2013  (43) March 2013  (44) February 2013  (43) January 2013  (52) December 2012  (46) November 2012  (44) October 2012  (55) September 2012  (51) August 2012  (46) July 2012  (54) June 2012  (51) May 2012  (38) April 2012  (18) 

Bart’s Latest Books
How Jesus Became God
Ehrman sketches Jesus’s transformation from a human prophet to the Son of God exalted to divine status at his resurrection…
Learn More
The Bible: A Historical and Literary Introduction
Bart presents his long-awaited survey of the Bible. Comprehensive yet succinct, current in scholarship, rich in pedagogical tools, and easily accessible to students of all backgrounds…
Learn More
 

 



Latest Additions


My Memory Book, Chapter 6 on “Collective Memory”
The sixth chapter of my book Jesus Before the Gospels is tentatively entitled “Collective Memory and Early Recollections of...


My Memory Book: False Memories and the Life of Jesus
As I indicated in my previous two posts, the fifth chapter of the book I’m now writing, Jesus Before The Gospels, deals wit...

One Time Donation to Foundation

Since Jan. 1, 2013, CIA has collected $104,500 for charity. You can help too! Any one-time donation to the Bart Ehrman Foundation helps Bart’s select charities fight hunger and homelessness. The optional form on the right allows reoccurring donations of your preferred limit and choice!



This is not a membership registration. If you wish to become a full member, please click REGISTER from top navigation bar.

Monthy Reoccuring Donations



When Do Donations Recur?
DailyMonthlyYearly 
How Many Times to Recur?
Never End23456789101112 
Enter Your Donation Amount



Login

Username:

Password:


 Remember Me


Register | Lost your Password?
 

 
© 2012-2015 Christianity in Antiquity (CIA): The Bart Ehrman Blog by Innovative Design

Return to Top
                          


http://ehrmanblog.org/on-debating-a-fundamentalist/